Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Income Tax-6, Mumbai Versus M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.

2015 (7) TMI 781 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Condonation of delay of 712 days in filing appeal - Held that:- Except listing out the dates indicating the manner in which the file pertaining to filing of the appeal moved from one desk to another, there is no explanation for the delay. In fact, as set out above the impugned order 11 September 2006 was received by the department on 21 September 2006 and it was only on 10 January 2007 that the Assessing Officer forwarded his comments to the office of Commissioner of Income seeking approval for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he facts and circumstances, the Department cannot take advantage of various earlier decisions - Condonation of delay is an exception and should not be used as an anticipated benefit for government departments. The law shelters everyone under the same light and should not be swirled for the benefit of a few - Appeals are liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay - Decided against revenue. - Notice of Motion No. 673 of 2011, Income Tax Appeal No. 6712 of 2010 - Dated:- 10-7-2015 - M. S. Sankle .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Motion seeking condonation of delay sets out the following reasons for the delay. 6. I say that in order to explain the reason for delay in filing the Appeal, I have hereinafter given the details as under : a) ITAT Order dated 11.09.2006 was received in the office of Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai on 21.09.2006. b) The Assessing officer submitted his comments/scrutiny report on 10.01.2007 and same was forwarded by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai to the office of Commiss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ft appeal was made on 23.12.2008. However, due to heavy load of time barring assessment work and other administrative difficulties, the appeal u/s 260A could not be filed in time. Accordingly, the appeal was filed on 07.01.2009. h) I say that the due date for filing the appeal was 16.01.2007. 7. I say that the chronological dates and events given as above, it would be seen that the office of the appellant was diligently following the matter for filing of the appeal on the due date itself. Howeve .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as set out above the impugned order 11 September 2006 was received by the department on 21 September 2006 and it was only on 10 January 2007 that the Assessing Officer forwarded his comments to the office of Commissioner of Income seeking approval for filing appeal. Similarly, there is no explanation provided in the affidavit of what happened between the date 16 January 2007 to 5 August 2008. 4. The Apex Court in the case of Post Master General and others Vs Living Media India Limited and anothe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version