Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhavnagar Versus M/s. Gujarat Maritime Board, Jafrabad

Valuation - wharfage charges - port services - inclusion of the amount of rebate/concession granted in wharfage charges amounting to 80% allowed to the licensee - under-valuation or not - tribunal observed that no service at all was rendered by the Gujarat Maritime Board in relation to any vessel and, therefore, no amount was payable by way of service tax. - Held that:- Though GMB is the owner of the jetty under the said agreement, yet for providing the service of allowing a vessel to berth at t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ar that so far as jetties operated by the Board are concerned, the Board itself defrays such expenses. It is only in cases like the present where the jetty is primarily meant for loading and unloading goods belonging to a particular private party that repair and maintenance expenses are to be borne by the private party and not by the Board. It is in this circumstance that we find that there is no service, therefore, rendered by GMB to UCL.

Authority given to perform any of the service .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to recover such charges from other persons. This being the position, it is clear that no service is rendered by a port or by any person authorized by such port and, therefore, the very first condition for levy of service tax is absent on the facts of the present case. So far as the direct berthing facilities provided for captive cargo is concerned, the lease rent charged for use of the waterfront also does not include any service in relation to a vessel or goods and cannot be described as “port .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inor ports in the State of Gujarat. GMB entered into an agreement dated 28.2.2000 with Larsen & Toubro which ultimately became M/s Ultratech Cement Limited (hereinafter referred to as UCL ) whereby a licence was granted to UCL to construct and use a jetty for landing of goods and raw materials manufactured by UCL in their cement factory which was situate close to the said jetty at Pipavav port. As the true construction of this agreement is the bone of contention between the parties, we will .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

03 to 31.3.2006, the differential amount being a sum of ₹ 1,67,45,620/-. A further amount of ₹ 12,53,076/- was also demanded for the period 2003 October upto 2007-2008 on account of the provision of direct berthing facilities provided for captive cargo of a ship size of 10,000 DWT and above on account of lease rent for use of the waterfront. By the order in original dated 16.7.2009, the Commissioner, Central Excise held that it is clear that the nature of service provided, which is w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ated 1.8.2013 reversed the Commissioner s order holding that no service at all was rendered by the Gujarat Maritime Board in relation to any vessel and, therefore, no amount was payable by way of service tax. Equally, on an analysis of the agreement between GMB and UCL, it was held that 20% of wharfage charges which was payable under the agreement was really payable as licence fee/rental and, therefore, the balance 80% being of the nature of licence fee/rental and not being of the nature of paym .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d by GMB as owner of the jetty, the service being the provision of a space for landing of goods from vessels which are allowed to berth there. As an alternative argument, on a correct reading of the agreement, it was also argued that GMB had authorized UCL to render the service of wharfage and since what was collected was actual wharfage charges in accordance with the schedule of rates prescribed under the Gujarat Maritime Board Act, it was in relation to goods that were loaded or off-loaded fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ence fee but is wharfage charges collected under the GMB Act for the service of allowing goods to be landed at the said jetty. According to learned counsel, the Gujarat Maritime Board was the owner and in control of the said jetty throughout the term of the agreement and all findings to the contrary by the Tribunal were incorrect. 5. Shri P.P. Tripathi, learned senior advocate appearing for the respondent countered all the aforesaid submissions and supported the Tribunal judgment. According to l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cence fee and that, therefore, the agreement read as a whole would lead to the conclusion that no service was in fact rendered by the respondent and, therefore, no service tax could be collected. 6. It is important first to advert to the Finance Act, 1994 under which the charge is laid for service tax. Section 65(82) defines port service as under:- Port service means any service rendered by a port or other port or any person authorized by such port or other port, in any manner in relation to a v .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at Maritime Board Act are as follows:- 35. Power to permit erection of private wharves, etc. within a port subject to conditions: (1) No person shall make, erect or fix within the limits of a port or port approaches any wharf, dock, quay, stage, jetty, pier, place of anchorage, erection or mooring or undertake any reclamation of foreshore within the said limits except with the previous permission in writing of the Board and subject to such conditions, if any, as the Board may specify. (2) If any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ime to time frame a scale of rates at which and a statement of the conditions under which any of the services specified hereunder (except the State charges) shall be performed by itself or any person authorized under Section 32 at or in relation to the port or port approaches- (a) transshipping of passengers or goods between vessels in the port or port approaches; (b) stevedoring, landing and shipping of passengers or goods from or to such vessels, to or from any wharf, quay jetty, pier, dock, b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ditions may be framed for different classes of goods and vessels and for different ports. 32. Performance of services by Board or other person:- 1) The Board shall have power to undertake the following services:- (a) stevedoring, landing, shipping or transshipping passengers and goods between vessels in port and the wharves, piers, quays, or docks belonging to or in the possession of the Board; (b) receiving, removing, shifting, transporting, storing or delivering goods brought within the Board .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ify. (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, the Board may authorize any person to perform any of the services mentioned in sub-section (1) on such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon. (4) No person authorized under sub-section (3) shall charge or recover for such service any sum in excess of the amount leviable according to the scale framed under Section 37, 38 or 40. (5) Any such person shall, if so required by the owner perform in respect of the goods any of the service .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or damage which may occur to them shall attach to any person to whom a receipt has been given or to the matter or owner of the vessel from which the goods have been landed or transshipped. 9. Since a large part of the arguments on both sides revolved around the agreement dated 28.2.2000, between GMB and UCL, it would be important to advert to the various provisions of the agreement. The agreement begins as follows: THE ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT made at Gandhinagar on this day 28th February, two thou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- 21, hereinafter referred to as the LICENSEE (which expression shall unless it be repugnant to the context or meaning thereof mean and include its successors and assigns) of the other part; WHEREAS the Licensee approached the Board for permission for construction and use of a Captive Jetty at Port Pipavav in the State of Gujarat on a license basis for the purpose of handling, storage and transportation of raw-materials for manufacturing and finished products that are manufactured by the License .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Section 35 of the Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 granted to the Licensee a license or permission for construction/use of the captive Jetty on the said port at the place aligned, demarcated, provided and approved by the Board upon the terms and conditions specified herein on Build, transfer, Operate and Maintain basis; NOW IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS: (c) PORT CHARGES would mean port charges specified in schedule of port charges, notified by government/Board under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nuing with construction and use of the Captive Jetty at the site demarcated on the plan, a layout of which has been annexed to this agreement. 3. The Licensee shall pay and continue to pay for the license granted under this Agreement a license fee of ₹ 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) per annum to the Board regularly on or before the 30th day of April every year during the currency of this agreement. 12. The ownership of the structure so constructed vests in the Board and the Licensee s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction i.e. to say taking into consideration the extent of investment made by it in the construction; PROVIDED that and it is agreed that the cost can be divided for the purpose of obtaining finance for the Jetty construction, it being, however, clearly understood that the water-front is a sovereign right of Government and the right of the Licensee is limited only for the purpose of mortgage or hypothecation to the extent of investment made by it and its right to concur in the event of transfer o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nsee in repayment of loan so that at the end of the period of this agreement when the Licensee may not have right of rebate under this agreement, then the construction is free of any liability in respect of such loan. PROVIDED further that the Bank or financial institution granting loan to the licensee shall not have any right against the Board. PROVIDED further that in the event of a declaration of War in the Country or any Emergency or on account of national security or any other circumstances .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oan documents. 15. The Board may, in order to decide the safety of the structure or for any other purpose, carry out inspection every six months from the date of issue of the Completion Certificate. The Licensee shall carry out maintenance and repairs to the structure at its own cost, whenever so directed by the Board upon inspection. No alteration or extension of the Jetty shall be done without prior permission of the Board in writing PROVIDED that this clause shall not preclude the Board from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t is further agreed that non-performance by Licensee shall be considered as a breach of condition of this agreement. 17. In consideration of the Board permitting the Licensee to construct the Captive Jetty at its own cost initially, the Board hereby agree that the Jetty to be so constructed by the Licensee shall mainly and initially as per the terms of this agreement, allowed to be used for the vessels belonging to the Licensee or chartered by the Licensee, on preferential basis, without any ous .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or for the traffic being regulated by the Board for the purpose of embarking or disembarking their ships, boats, tugs, etc. and for loading and discharging cargo. The Licensee or its Agents shall not by any act of commission or omission, restrict the use of the Jetty and back up area by the Board except when it is actually used by the Licensee for the purpose provided for in this agreement. PROVIDED that this clause shall not be construed to mean that Licensee has any ownership or transferable r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cost initially, the Board has agreed to grant rebate, to be adjusted against the cost of construction, as under: A. The Licensee shall have to pay landing/shipping fees (popularly known as wharfage charges) @ 20% of the actual landing and shipping fees specified in the Schedule of Port Charges prescribed for Captive Jetty. The landing and shipping fees shall be calculated for this purpose as per the schedule of landing and shipping fees, as may be revised or amended from time to time. This conce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

B. The Licensee shall also be entitled, as in the normal case to a concession in payment of landing/shipping fees for coastal transportation of the cargo from one port under the Board to another port under the Board @ 25% and from one port under the Board to another Indian Port or vice-versa @ 15% or at the rate as may be applicable from time to time. C. No Rebate will be given in respect of any other charges to be levied under Indian Ports Act and under Gujarat Maritime Board Act. The parties s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

water supply, fire fighting equipments, electricity, telephone, Very High Frequency (VHF) sets of HF sets and such other services and facilities which may be required at or around the Jetty and also such other services and facilities which the Board may require the Licensee to keep available at or around the Jetty. If the Licensee does not provide all or any of the aforesaid facilities, the Board may at its own discretion provide such facilities at the cost and risk of the Licensee and shall rec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of captive port facility. If the said notice is not complied with, the Board shall give another Notice to terminate this agreement if the said breach is not complied with within a period of further 15 days and that on the expiry of such period of 15 days, the agreement shall automatically be deemed to have been terminated without further notice. Upon such termination of the agreement, the Board shall be entitled to take control or otherwise dispose off all or any part of the Jetty that may have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entitled to any refund. In case of any dispute or difference by and between the Licensee and the Board, the same shall be referred to the Arbitration of Secretary of the Government in Ports and Fisheries Department and it shall be held in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Arbitration and Reconciliation Act, 1996 or any statutory modification or re-enactment thereof for the time being in force. 36. The agreement shall remain in force for a period of twenty five years or till such time .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to exist, i.e., continues to function. It is agreed and understood by the Licensee that out of the terms Jetty the terms applicable for the purpose of this Agreement may be retained in this Agreement and other words/terms not applicable may be deleted. 10. A reading of the agreement as a whole would lead to the following conclusions: A. The agreement is a licence agreement entered into under Section 35 of the Gujarat Maritime Board Act under which a licence or permission for construction and use .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of UCL. The licence granted to UCL is, therefore, a non-transferable one. E. The Board is entitled to carry out inspection every six months so that it can direct the licensee to maintain and repair the structure at its own cost, maintenance of the said jetty in good order and condition being that of the licensee alone, a breach of which is considered as a breach of the agreement. F. The jetty is to be used mainly for the goods of the licensee and when not in use by the licensee can be used by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e to pay thereafter wharfage charges at the full rate prescribed in the schedule of port charges for captive jetties. H. For direct berthing facilities provided for captive cargo in ships which call at the jetty of 10,000 DWT and above, an amount of ₹ 25,00,000/- will be charged as lease rent for waterfront use. I. It is the licensee UCL that will provide all services at or around the jetty including dredging, navigation, etc. and if this is not done then the Board may on its own provide s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e jetty whichever date is earlier. However, even after the rebate and the construction cost square off, the licensee will be allowed to use the jetty for captive purposes subject to full payment of wharfage charges so long as the project of the licensee - i.e. the cement plant of the licensee continues to function. 11. The question which arises on a reading of the said agreement is, therefore, whether any service is rendered by GMB or by any person authorized by GMB in relation to a vessel or go .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndition that it is capable of enabling vessels to berth alongside it to load and unload goods. This being the position, we agree with Shri Tripathi, learned senior counsel on behalf of GMB that no service is rendered by GMB to UCL under the agreement. The agreement makes it clear that it is an agreement entered into under Section 35 of the GMB Act allowing the licensee - UCL to construct a jetty and thereafter maintain it at its own cost. We may add that the rebate in wharfage charges of 80% is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ition that must be met under the definition of port service is not met on the facts of the present case. 12. Shri Adhyaru argued relying upon the definition of wharf and wharfage in Black s Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition that all that is necessary is that a wharf be provided by the Board. The very provision of such wharf would entitle the Board to levy a fee which is nothing other than wharfage charges collected under the Schedule of rates mentioned hereinabove. To appreciate this argument we s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Shri Adhyaru for the reason that though GMB is the owner of the jetty under the said agreement, yet for providing the service of allowing a vessel to berth at the said jetty, it is necessary for GMB itself to keep the said jetty in good order. Wharfage charges are collectible because they are in the nature of fees for services rendered. The expenses that are defrayed by the Board for the maintenance of the jetty is sought to be collected as wharfage charges. This amount would necessarily include .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this circumstance that we find that there is no service, therefore, rendered by GMB to UCL. 13. The other limb of Shri Adhyaru s argument is that in any case UCL is a person authorized by GMB within the definition of port service and that, therefore, in any case the Section would be attracted as there is no doubt that wharfage charges are a payment for services rendered in relation to a vessel or goods. 14. As can be seen from Section 32 sub-sections (3) and (4), the Board may authorize any pers .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM – Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version