Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Kalanikethan Fashions P. Ltd., (Formerly KLN Textiles & Jewels P. Ltd.) , Hyderabad Versus Dy. Commissioner of Incometax, Circle – 2 (2) , Hyderabad

2015 (7) TMI 865 - ITAT HYDERABAD

Disallowance of repayment of gold loan to SBI - Held that:- There is no doubt to the fact loan as per the scheme was not in terms of cash but in terms of gold. Therefore, the gold obtained under the loan scheme form part of the stock-in-trade of the erstwhile firm and was converted into ornaments for trading purpose. Therefore, the purpose of loan is for the working capital for conducting business. When assessee took over assets and liabilities of erstwhile firm along with the loan, cost incurre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

though the amount has been termed as interest but it is not interest in strict sense of the term. As far as interest payment is concerned, definitely they have accrued to assessee in the respective AYs. However, as far as the repayment of principal amount is concerned, as per the terms of the agreement with bank it has to be on the basis of value of gold as on the date of repayment. Therefore, the liability on that account cannot be an ascertained liability, which could be said to have accrued .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

JJ. For the Petitioner : Shri M.V.R. Prasad For the Respondent : Shri Ramakrishna Bandi ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY, J.M.: This appeal by assessee is directed against the order dated 08/07/2013 of ld. CIT(A)-III, Hyderabad for the AY 2007-08 2. Assessee has raised 5 grounds as per the revised grounds of appeal. Ground Nos. 1 & 5 being general in nature do not require any specific adjudication. Ld. AR at the outset submitted that on assessee s instruction he would not like to press ground No. 4, a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

also ancillary and incidental to the issue raised in ground Nos. 2 & 3, the same will be decided along with ground Nos. 2 & 3. 3. Briefly the facts as emanating from record are, assessee a company, as stated by AO, was formed on01/04/2006 by merger of three partnership firms, viz., KLN Readymades, KLN Silks and Sarees and KLN Jewels. Of course, assessee has stated before us that the company was actually incorporated on 23/12/2005. Be that as it may, AO in course of assessment proceeding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntal expenditure, such as sales tax, the total value came to ₹ 98,54,661, but, when the company closed the said gold loan account on 15/03/07, it paid a total amount of ₹ 1,41,86,851 and the differential amount of ₹ 43,32,190 was debited to P& A/c as interest on Gold Metal account. AO observed that liability incurred by assessee pertained to the period from the date of taking gold loan to the date of closure of the loan amount i.e. almost two years and six months, which acc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see is not correct in taking over the unbooked liability of partnership firm , hence, he proposed to disallow the interest attributable to the period prior to 31/03/2006. Though, assessee objected to such disallowance, AO did not find any merit in the same. He noted that assessee company was formed only on 01/04/06, hence, loans relating to prior period of the firm could not be claimed as deduction at the hands of the company in the current AY. AO observed that though it may be a fact that under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of accounting. AO observed, as the expenditure pertains to the firm, the firm could have claimed such expenditure in the respective AY. Only because the firm failed to claim such expenditure, assessee cannot get the benefit of such deduction. He further observed that assessee even did not furnish copy of gold metal loan account and loan agreement. Accordingly, AO worked out the disallowance of interest prior to the period 01/04/2006 as under: Amount paid on settlement of gold loan a/c as per Ba .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ovided by the AO are not controverted at all. There is no doubt about the fact that the terms and conditions of the gold metal account were very clear to the appellant and the liability of interest had been ascertained every year. The value of gold at the end of the year was known and it was clear to the appellant that the difference in value had to be debited as interest on charges to be paid to the bank. I agree with the AO that as per the mercantile system of accounting the liability pertaini .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ld. AR submitted, though the value of the gold metal loan when the loan obtained was ₹ 98,54,661, but, at the time of closure of the account, assessee had to pay an amount of ₹ 1,41,86,850 due to appreciation in the value of gold. Therefore, the rate cutting difference amounting to ₹ 43,32,189 being the cost of loan to assessee is an allowable deduction. Ld. AR submitted, loan was obtained not in cash, but, by way of gold and it was used for making ornaments in which assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

support of such contention, ld. AR relied upon the following decisions: 1. Mahindra Inter trade LtdVs. DCIT, [2011] 133 ITD 597 (Mum.) 2. United Phosphorus Ltd. Vs. JCIT, [2002] 81 ITD 553 (Ahd.) 5. Ld. DR, on the other hand, strongly supporting the reasoning of AO and ld. CIT(A) submitted, deduction claimed by assessee is not at all allowable as it is not interest, but, an extra cost incurred by assessee on account of appreciation of gold value on the date of repayment. Therefore, the excess pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e loan and repayment depends upon the fluctuation of foreign exchange. Therefore, deduction cannot be claimed by assessee on trading account as it relates to capital field. 6. We have heard the parties and perused the orders of revenue authorities as well as other materials on record. We have also carefully examined the decisions relied upon by the parties. At the outset we may put it on record that though assessee before the departmental authorities as well as even before us stated that deducti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

evenue, since the AO himself has allowed a part of the expenditure. Keeping in view the aforesaid factual position, the issue has to be dealt with. Undisputedly, M/s KLN Jewellery has taken gold loan of ₹ 98,54,661 from SBI, Vizag which was not in terms of cash but in terms of gold. It is also a fact that assessee utilized the said gold for making ornaments for its trading activity. However, M/s KLN Jewellery amalgamated with assessee company on 31/03/06 and as per the terms of agreement a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

laimed can be allowed as a revenue expenditure. There is no doubt to the fact loan as per the scheme was not in terms of cash but in terms of gold. Therefore, the gold obtained under the loan scheme form part of the stock-in-trade of the erstwhile firm and was converted into ornaments for trading purpose. Therefore, the purpose of loan is for the working capital for conducting business. When assessee took over assets and liabilities of erstwhile firm along with the loan, cost incurred by assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version