Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Hari Om Steels (P) Ltd., Kanpur and others Versus ACIT – 6, Kanpur and others

Addition on confiscation of stocks of scrap Rail and scrap Cast Iron by the District Authorities against the dues of KESCO - Held that:- CIT (A) decided the issue against the assessee by holding that there is no dispute regarding the value of confiscated stock of ₹ 50,92,490/- for which only possession has changed but the right remains with the assessee only. Before us also, same argument is made without establishing that entire stock of 832.809 M.T. was auctioned for ₹ 2.03 lacs bec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n books, then the payment to KESCO is to reduce sundry creditor only and in that situation, sale proceeds of stock has to be considered as income only and the balance has to be considered as stock in absence of any evidence that entire stock was sold for ₹ 2.03 Lacs. If this demand of KESCO is other than liability as per books than also the assessee has to establish that deduction is allowable for the same but the assessee has not even explained the nature of the liability said to be payab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Supra). Learned CIT (A) has decided this issue by following this judgment and learned DR could not point out any difference in facts. Hence, we decline to interfere in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue. - Decided against revenue,

Unexplained investment made in the purchase of unrecorded stock - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- CIT (A) has given a categorical finding that purchase shown in the stock statement submitted to bank almost tallies with value reflected in bo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

show as to how this judgment of Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Khan & Sirohi Steel Rolling Mills (Supra) is not applicable. Hence, we decline to interfere in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue also - Decided against revenue.

Disallowance out of depreciation on plant & machinery which as per the assessing officer were not put in to use during the period under reference - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- none of the judgments followed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

now i.e. in the year 2015. Considering all these facts, we hold that the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue is not sustainable and therefore, we reverse the same and restore that of the A.O. - Decided in favour of revenue.

Addition u/s 43B on account of penal interest charged by the bank and interest payable to bank - CIT(A) delted addition - Held that:- Disallowance was made by the A.O. on account of interest payable on cash credit account and on account of penal interest charged .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

>
Validity of assessment order u/s 143(3) - Held that:- Learned CIT (A) held that since the notice u/s 143 (2) was not validly served on the assessee within prescribed time, the assessment is void and he annulled the same. We find no infirmity in the order of CIT (A) in the facts of the present case and therefore, we decline to interfere in his order. See Anil Kumar Goel vs. ITO [2007 (2) TMI 260 - ITAT LUCKNOW-A ] - Decided against revenue. - ITA No.382/LKW/2013,ITA No.526 & 720/LKW/2013 - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

First, we take up the assessee s appeal. The only one effective ground raised is as under:- (i) The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals)- II Kanpur has erred in law and on facts in sustaining the addition of ₹ 50,92,440/- made by the assessing Officer on account of confiscation of stocks of scrap Rail and scrap Cast Iron by the District Authorities against the dues of KESCO. 3. Learned AR of the assessee reiterated the same contentions which were raised before CIT (A) and noted by him on page 11 of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty of stock seized but the same could not be furnished. Learned DR of the revenue supported the orders of the authorities below. 4. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that as per the A.O., there was opening stock of raw materials as per item no. 28A of the Tax Audit Report of Rail (Form 31) 344.374 MT and Cast Iron (Form 31) 488.435 MT total 832.809 MT. He has also reproduced the note given by the auditors which reads as under:- As explained to us, this stock has been seized by KE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing reply. Under these facts, the A.O. made addition of ₹ 50,92,490/- being value of this stock. When the assessee carried the matter in appeal before CIT (A), only argument was this that district authorities auctioned this entire stock for ₹ 2.03 Lacs which was adjusted towards arrear demands by KESCO. Learned CIT (A) decided the issue against the assessee by holding that there is no dispute regarding the value of confiscated stock of ₹ 50,92,490/- for which only possession ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Lacs is said to have been adjusted against outstanding demand of KESCO of ₹ 71,21,300/-. If this demand of KESCO of ₹ 71,21,300/- or any part thereof is already accounted for in books, then the payment to KESCO is to reduce sundry creditor only and in that situation, sale proceeds of stock has to be considered as income only and the balance has to be considered as stock in absence of any evidence that entire stock was sold for ₹ 2.03 Lacs. If this demand of KESCO is other than .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nue is aggrieved for deletion of the addition of ₹ 18,47,381/- made by the A.O. on the basis of profit on sale outside books of excess stock shown in the stock statement submitted to the bank by the assessee as on 31.03.2002 and no such excess stock shown in the stock statement submitted to the bank by the assessee as on 30.04.2002. 8. Learned DR of the revenue supported the assessment order and learned AR of the assessee supported the order of CIT (A). He also placed reliance on the judgm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acts. Hence, we decline to interfere in the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue. These grounds are rejected. 10. Ground No. 4 to 5 are also inter connected as per which, the revenue is aggrieved for deletion of the addition of ₹ 24,39,059/- made by the A.O. on account of alleged unexplained investment made in the purchase of unrecorded stock. 11. Learned DR of the revenue supported the assessment order and learned AR of the assessee supported the order of CIT (A). He also submitted that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of accounts are not rejected and no other adverse circumstantial evidence is brought on record by the A.O. After making these observations, he has decided this issue by following this judgment of Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Khan & Sirohi Steel Rolling Mills (Supra). Learned DR of the revenue could not controvert these categorical findings of CIT (A) and he could not show as to how this judgment of Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court rendered in the case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

venue supported the assessment order. He also submitted that as per section 38, depreciation is not allowable in the facts of the present case. Learned AR of the assessee supported the order of CIT (A). He also submitted that the assets were ready for use and hence, depreciation is allowable. 15. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that the learned CIT (A) has decided this issue by following the judgment of Hon ble Allahabad High Court in the case of CIT vs. Swaroop Vegetable Produ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this case, there was a categorical finding of the tribunal that the unit was kept ready for use and despite all efforts to restore, it remained under suspension. In the present case, the assessee has started trading business and although we are in the year 2015, the learned AR of the assessee could not show that the manufacturing activity has restarted. Nothing is brought on record to establish this also that the plant & machinery were kept ready for use. Mere submission that it were kept r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

but only two machines for 2 in pouch making were not used because of no demand for such pouches. Because of these differences in facts, this tribunal order is also not applicable. 18. The next judgment is the judgment of Hon ble Delhi High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd.(Supra). In this case also, only some items of machineries were not used but the concerned block was used. Under these facts, it was held that when the block of assets is being used in the relevan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e. 19. The next judgment is also the judgment of Hon ble Delhi High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Panacea Bitech Pvt. Ltd. (Supra). In this case, the facts were that the office was put to use but not full fledged use. Under these facts, it was held that depreciation is allowable because full fledged use of office is not essential. Hence, it is seen that the facts in that case are also totally different. Therefore, this judgment is also not applicable. 20. As per above discussion, it is s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

industrial unit has restarted even till now i.e. in the year 2015. Considering all these facts, we hold that the order of learned CIT (A) on this issue is not sustainable and therefore, we reverse the same and restore that of the A.O. This ground is allowed. 21. As per Ground No. 7, the revenue is aggrieved for deletion of the addition of ₹ 20,22,852/- made by the A.O. u/s 43B on account of penal interest charged by the bank and interest payable to bank. 22. Learned DR of the revenue suppo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e penal interest was for contravention of contractual obligation between borrower and lender and not for infraction of any law. Learned DR of the revenue could not controvert any of these findings of CIT (A). Hence, we find no reason to interfere in the order of CIT (A) on this issue. This ground is rejected. 24. In the result, this appeal of the revenue is partly allowed. 25. Now, we take up the revenue s appeal for A.Y. 2005 - 06 in ITA No. 720/LKW/2013. 26. The grounds raised by the revenue a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fore the AO. 3. That the CIT(A) has erred in law and facts in ignoring that the impugned notice and assessment proceedings were in substance and effect in conformity with or according to the intent and purposes of the Act and being thus covered by Section 292B could not be invalidated. 4. The CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in annulling the assessment order ignoring the provision of Section 124 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whereby the assessee could not question the jurisdiction of the AO a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: import purchase

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version