Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Fasttrack Packers Pvt. Ltd., Ahmednagar Versus ACIT Central Circle-1 (1) , Pune

2015 (7) TMI 1019 - ITAT PUNE

Disallowance of group gratuity insurance premium u/s.40A(9) - Held that:- Tribunal in assessee’s own case for A.Y. 2007-08 and A.Y. 2008-09 decided the issue against the assessee on the ground that no such approval has been received from the CIT till date. In view of the above and following the decision of the Coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the preceding two assessment years, the grounds raised by the assessee on this issue are dismissed. - Decided against assessee. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he basis of any addition in the hands of the assessee. In this view of the matter, we hold that the CIT(A) was not justified in sustaining the addition made by the Assessing Officer amounting to ₹ 16,83,500/- on account of unaccounted cash received by the assessee from Shri Rajendra S. Raka of M/s. Rajendra Trading Company. - Decided in favour of assessee.

Disallowance on account of loss on account of forgery - Held that:- The assessee company is not authorised to carry on the b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ered by the assessee nor any criminal complaint filed against the suspect. The loss does not pertain to the impugned assessment year as the first instalment of ₹ 14,40,000/- was made through RTGS on 19-03-2009. Accordingly AO was justified in disallowing the loss claimed by the assessee u/s.37(1) as well as 36(1)(vii). The assessee could not controvert any of the observations given by the CIT(A) to substantiate the allowability of the claim. In absence of any valid argument by the Ld. Coun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

irected against the separate orders dated 20-03-2013 of the CIT(A)-I, Pune relating to Assessment Years 2009-10 and 2010-11 respectively. For the sake of convenience both the appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. ITA No.1116/PN/2013 (A.Y. 2009-10) : 2. Grounds of appeal No.1 to 1.3 by the assessee relate to the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance in respect of group gratuity insurance premium of ₹ 50,50,544/- made by the Assessing Office .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of the Assessing Officer for which the assessee is in appeal before us. 4. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset referred to the decision of the Tribunal in assessee s own case for A.Y. 2007-08 and A.Y. 2008-09 vide ITA Nos. 1043 & 1044/PN/2013 order dated 25-11-2014 and submitted that the Tribunal has decided the issue against the assessee on the ground that no such approval has been received from the CIT till date. In view of the above and following the decision of the Coordinat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ction u/s.132 of the I.T. Act was conducted in the Malpani group of cases on 06-10-2009. Since warrant of authorisation u/s.132(4) of the I.T. Act was executed in the case of the assessee, the Assessing Officer issued notice u/s.153A of the I.T. Act which was duly served on the assessee. In response to the same, the assessee filed the return of income on 24-06-2010 disclosing total income of ₹ 2,31,00,278/- which is same as the income returned vide original return filed on 21-09-2009. Duri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

last many years he used to purchase the bags of Gai Chhap Jarda from Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. @ ₹ 2,350/- per bag upto 31-12-2008 and that w.e.f. 01-10-2009 he started purchasing the same bags of Gaichhap Jarda from Malpani group s sister concern M/s. Fasttrack Packers Pvt. Ltd. @ ₹ 1,850/- per bag and that as a part of the said arrangement he was returning the cash @ ₹ 500/- per bag to M/s. Fasttrack Packers Pvt. Ltd. between 01-01-2009 to 06-10-2009 (i.e. upto the date of se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essing Officer therefore confronted the assessee by putting the following questions : Your attention is drawn towards the fact that during the course of search action, Shri Rajendra S. Raka (Proprietor of M/s Rajendra Trading Company, Satana, Nashik) in his statement u/s 132(4) has deposed that he has been purchasing goods directly from the assessee company M/s Fasttrack Packers Pvt. Ltd. and has been giving substantial unaccounted cash to M/s Fasttrack Packers Pvt. Ltd. / Malpani Group. In view .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssible for him to pay ₹ 500/- per bag by way of cash since his margin was about ₹ 500/- per bag out of which he has to incur all the expenses for selling the goods. It was argued that his premises were also covered during the course of search action and no incriminating documents showing assessee s name has been found in his premises. Even during the survey in the assessee s premises no incriminating document was found. It was stated that initial statement given by Shri Rajendra S. R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d confirmed that he has returned the total cash of ₹ 49,24,500/- to the assessee M/s. Fasttrack Packers Pvt. Ltd. which is not recorded in his books and that under the said arrangement an amount of ₹ 16,83,500/- has been returned to the assessee during A.Y. 2009-10 @ ₹ 500/- per bag for 3367 bags. The Assessing Officer therefore again confronted the assessee by issuing the final show cause notice. The assessee in response to the same submitted his reply which has been summarise .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has also submitted affidavit of Shri Raka stating that he had wrongly stated that he paid ₹ 500/- per bag unaccounted cash to the Fast Track Packers Pvt. Ltd. in the initial statement recorded u/s.132(4) on 06-10-2009. He once again confirmed that he had not paid any unaccounted cash to company. 10. However, the Assessing Officer was not satisfied with the explanation given by the assessee. Distinguishing the various decisions cited before him and rejecting the various submissions, he mad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by key person of the group Shri. Rajesh Malpani vide his statement dated 03/12/2009 recorded on oath u/s 132(4) of the IT Act. As per this modus operandi discovered by the Department, Malpani Group used to receive unaccounted cash back from its dealers, as the dealers were under the control and influence of the group. The instant case is one such example of receipt of unaccounted cash from one of its dealer Shri Rajendra S. Raka @ ₹ 500/- per bag of Gaichhap Jarda. 2) Shri Rajendra S Raka .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

with the evidences gathered during the Search, Shri. Raka, dealer of M/s FastTrack Packers Pvt Ltd (a concern of Group) admitted in his sworn statement u/s 132(4), that this was H windfall gain for him in the form of enhanced profit of ₹ 500/bag of Gai Chhap Jarda, but it was a part of an arrangement between him and Malpani Group ( he being under their influence and control, being their dealer), wherein he was required to return this cash @ ₹ 500/bag to M/s. FastTrack Packers Pvt Lt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of returning of cash @ 500/bag to M/s Fasttrack Packers Pvt. Ltd., is corroborated and substantiated by a number of irrefutable evidences gathered during the search. 6) The delayed, whimsical and unsubstantiated retraction on the part of Shri. Raka, is neither corroborated or substantiated through any evidence, nor any element of coercion could be attributed/proved while recording the statement u/s. 132(4), wherein the said admission was made by Shri. Raka. Thus, the said retraction is nothing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ka was appointed as dealer by the assessee company from 01-01-2009. In his initial statement recorded on 06- 10-2003 he had stated that he used to pay ₹ 500/- per bag to the assessee. However, within a span of 4 days from the original statement, the assessee vide letter dated 10-10-2009 requested the Investigating Officer to give him an opportunity of being heard in order to clarify certain facts which were incorrectly stated in the original statement. The assessee was given an opportunity .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tly from the assessee. Accordingly, he entered into a settlement with Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. thereby paying a total sum of (Rs.15.20 lakhs @ ₹ 95/- per bag for 16000 bags) towards compensation in respect of non compete fees. It was clarified that at the time of survey Shri Rajendra S. Raka confused the said payment to be the alleged payment to the assessee which was incorrect. Thus, from January 2009 onwards, the assessee availed the goods at discounted price of ₹ 1,850/- per bag f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

jendra Trading Company have been made at a price of ₹ 2,350/- per bag. The assessment order of Shri Rajendra S. Raka for A.Y. 2009-10 was also brought to the notice of the CIT(A). 14. As regards the conclusion of the Assessing Officer that apart from purchase consideration of ₹ 1,850/- per bag stated in the books of M/s. Rajendra Trading Company, M/s. Rajendra Trading Company has made unaccounted payment of ₹ 500/- per bag to the assessee is concerned, it was stated that if the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see submitted that there is no justification on the part of the Assessing Officer to rely on the initial statement recorded of Shri Rajendra S. Raka without appreciating the fact that the same had been retracted by him later on. The statement given u/s.132(4) by Shri Rajendra S. Raka was wrong and it was given due to misunderstanding of the questions and the panicky state of mind. The assessee further argued that despite a search conducted at the business premises of Shri Rajendra S. Raka no inc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d proposition of law that no addition can be made on the basis of the statement of a third party and particularly when such third party has also retracted from the said statement. 15. As regards the observation of the Assessing Officer that during the course of search proceedings in the case of Malpani group, the modus operandi of the generation of unaccounted cash receipts which has been unearthed has been accepted by the Malpani group and that the assessee company is a sister concern of the Ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o M/s. Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. Finally, it was argued that the statement of Shri Rajendra S. Raka may be relevant for deciding the case of Shri Rajendra S. Raka. However, on that basis no addition should be made in the case of the assessee in the absence of any incriminating evidence found as a result of the search. It was accordingly argued that no such addition should be made in the hands of the assessee. 16. However, the CIT(A) was not satisfied with the arguments advanced by the assessee. S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o the assessee @ ₹ 500/- per bag has to be accepted as true and correct statement. The main witness in this case Shri Rajendra S. Raka had not obtained any statement or affidavit from the independent witnesses present during the recording of the statement in support of the plea that the statement was obtained by coercion or intimidation. 17. As regards the submission of the assessee that Shri Rajendra S. Raka had requested the Investigating Officer within a period of 4 days of the recordin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be a genuine letter. 18. So far as the argument of the assessee that even during the course of search action conducted at the premises of the assessee company no incriminating document has been found in respect of the alleged unaccounted receipts from Shri Rajendra S. Raka, she noted that there was a clear admission of Shri Rajendra S. Raka who was covered in survey action by the Department simultaneous to the search action of Malpani group on being shown evidence of Challan No.242 Bundle No.Z-2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aler of Malpani group, it was as per the direction of that group that he had to show ₹ 1,850/- as purchase cost in books and pay the difference of ₹ 500/- per bag in cash to the assessee. Thus, the assessee is not correct in stating that no incriminating evidence was found during the course of search at its premises. She noted that the survey covered the business premises of Shri Rajendra S. Raka and therefore his deposition subsequently that he was not in possession of the accounts .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rajendra S. Raka has offered to disclose additional income on this account. She further noted that Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. which was the main business concern of the Malpani group has approached the Settlement Commission following the search admitting that unaccounted income had been generated through the modus operandi of cash receipts not recorded in the books of account. 19. She noted that in his statement recorded u/s.131 on 27-01-2010 Shri Rajendra S. Raka in response to Question No.6 has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lso proved from the conduct of Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. by their consequential act of approaching the Settlement Commission. The modus operandi of cash component of sale with purchase has been sought to be disguised subsequently as payment against target discount by the dealer Shri Rajendra S. Raka which is undoubtedly under the control and influence of the Malpani group. 20. As regards the submission of the assessee that the statement has no value in absence of any evidence or any incriminating .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pect of all matters relevant for the purpose of any investigation connected with any proceeding under the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961. She further noted that the examination of the books of account with Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. the assessee and Shri Rajendra S. Raka, all of whom were covered during the course of search conducted simultaneously on 06-10-2009 at their respective premises, clearly show the discrepancy between the purchase price of ₹ 2,350/- per bag of the Gai chhap Jarda upto .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dence to support the same the CIT(A) held that a statement voluntarily recorded under oath cannot be allowed to be disbelieved or rejected through a mere retraction and rethinking unless evidence is brought on record that undue influence or coercion was applied at the time of recording the initial statement. Relying on various decisions the Ld.CIT(A) held that the retraction by Shri Rajendra S. Raka is not be relied upon and the totality of the facts and circumstances including the discovery of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

group. The assessee is only packing the material and not the manufacturer. The search took place in the case of Shri Rajendra S. Raka on 06-10-2009. Simultaneous search also took place in the case of the assessee as well as in the case of Malpani group. The Malpani group has not stated anything against the assessee. He submitted that initially Shri Rajendra S. Raka purchased the goods from Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. @ ₹ 2,350/- per bag which continued upto 31-12-2008. Subsequently, w.e.f. 0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee on the basis of statement recorded of a third party provided the same is clear and supported with corroborative evidence. It cannot be on the basis of a statement which lead to anarchy. He submitted that when Shri Rajendra S. Raka purchased the goods at ₹ 1,850/- per bag and sells the same at ₹ 2,350/- per bag, there is margin of only ₹ 500/- per bag. Out of the same, he has to give ₹ 95/- per bag to Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. He has also to pay tax on the prof .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent of persons in absence of any corroborative evidence. He accordingly submitted that addition made in the hands of the assessee should be deleted. 25. The Ld. Departmental Representative on the other hand heavily relied on the order of the CIT(A). He submitted that Shri Rajendra S. Raka has retracted his statement after a gap of 4 months and therefore such retraction has no evidentiary value which is after considerable time. Again referring to the letter addressed to the ADIT (Investigation) s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the assessee that assessee has got nothing to do with Malpani group, he submitted that nothing has been brought on record to substantiate that assessee is not related to the Malpani group. He submitted that the same sets of people are the Directors in both the companies. Further, when Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. was supplying the material at ₹ 2,350/- per bag, M/s.Fasttrack Packers Pvt. Ltd., all of a sudden started supplying the same goods at ₹ 1,850/- per bag. Therefore, there is no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ble Supreme Court in the case of Sumati Dayal reported in 214 ITR 801 and various other decisions he submitted that the order of the CIT(A) should be upheld. 27. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee in his rejoinder referring to the order of the CIT(A) from pages 11 to 15 drew the attention of the Bench to page 15 of the order and submitted that the assessee had categorically stated that the shareholders of the assessee company and that of the Malpani group are different and the directors of the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d undated and therefore such retraction has no evidentiary value, he submitted that even if the assessee had not retracted, then also no addition can be made in absence of any corroborative evidence. He submitted that the theory of probability cannot be applied for making addition in the hands of the assessee that too in a search case. 28. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) and the Paper Book filed on behalf o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

round that Shri Rajendra S. Raka in his statement u/s.132(4) had confirmed the payment of ₹ 500/-per bag to the assessee from 01-01-2009 to 06-10-2009 and the amount received by the assessee was substantiated by a number of irrefutable evidences gathered during the search. Further, the modus operandi of the Malpani group had been disclosed before the Settlement Commisison and Shri Rajendra S. Raka was under the influence and control of the Malpani group. The possibility of such unaccounted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fore the modus operandi of the business transaction of the Malpani group unearthed during the search on the Malpani group had no bearing on the case of the assessee. It is also the case of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that Shri Rajendra S. Raka had retracted from his statement recorded u/s.132(4), therefore, the Assessing Officer had no reason to place reliance on the statement recorded u/s.132(4). 29. We find some force in the arguments advanced by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. Admitted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on for demanding the opportunity of bearing heard. A.5 During the course of search action at my business premises, my statement was recorded on 6-10-2009 and 7-10-2009. Subsequently, I have went through the statement as provided to me and also the seized material and my accounts. I realised that I have made mistakes in stating the correct facts as I was to answer the questions instantly without studying the accounts and seized material thoroughly. Q.6 Explain the points in respect of which you c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as been billed at ₹ 2350 per bag for Gai chap, Jarda. This is after deduction of ₹ 95 towards the Target Discount. As per the rules framed by the Company with effect from 01/04/2008, as we could not achieve the target and due to failure of other terms, we paid the cash of about ₹ 6.50 lacs in for the period of April 2008 to Dec., 2008 as against the Target Discount to Malpani Group from the cash collected on behalf of them on sales made through us, to further period from Jan 20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s (P) Ltd. or Mr. Sachin Palod. Q.7 You have already stated in your earlier statement that you have paid ₹ 49,24,500/- to Fasttrack Packers Private Limited. A.7 Since I was little tense at the time of search, and was not in possession of the accounts and seized documents from different premises, my replies were not totally as per facts. Earlier our gross margins were about ₹ 500/- per bag out of which ₹ 95/-per bag were collected on behalf of Malpani Group. I therefore wrongly .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

kers Private Limited. 30. As regards the observation of the Ld.CIT(A) at para 6.5 of her order that evidence of Challan bearing No.242 Bundle Z-2 dated 07- 08-2009 seized from the office of the assessee at Malpani house, Sangamner evidencing payment of ₹ 12,16,387/- by M/s. Rajendra Trading Company to the assessee is concerned, we find the office address of the assessee as mentioned in the assessment order is at 48/1, Kasara Dumale, Akola Road, Sangamner, Ahmednagar and not at Malpani hous .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Ld. Departmental Representative. We find the assessee before the CIT(A) has categorically stated that it is in no way related to the Malpani group which is borne out from the order of the CIT(A). We find the Ld. CIT(A) at page 15 of her order has extracted the submission of the assessee and the relevant portion of the same reads as under : 5.11. Lastly, the assessee would like to submit that the learned A.O. has stressed on the fact that in the course of search proceedings in the case of Malpa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e company are different. It is to be noted that directors of the assessee company are nowhere related with the partners, directors, company and partnership firms of the Malpani group. It is further clarified that the control, management and source of funds of the appellant company are totally independent. The assessee also states that it is not in any way related to M/s. Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd. Therefore, it is submitted] that the learned A.O. is not justified in holding that the assessee has r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ind merit in the submission of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that when Shri Rajendra S. Raka has purchased the goods from the assessee @ ₹ 1,850/- per bag and sells the same at ₹ 2,350/- he makes profit of R.500/- only per bag, out of the same pays ₹ 95/- per bag to Sargam Retails Pvt. Ltd., as compensation and also pays income-tax on the profit. Therefore, there is no surplus to the extent of ₹ 500/- per bag to be given to the assessee. If the contention of the Assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, merely on the basis of statement given by Shri Rajendra S. Raka, which has been retracted subsequently, cannot be the basis of any addition in the hands of the assessee. In this view of the matter, we hold that the CIT(A) was not justified in sustaining the addition made by the Assessing Officer amounting to ₹ 16,83,500/- on account of unaccounted cash received by the assessee from Shri Rajendra S. Raka of M/s. Rajendra Trading Company. We accordingly set aside the same and grounds rais .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ave been dismissed. Following the same ratio, the grounds raised by the assessee on this issue are dismissed. 35. Grounds of appeal No. 2 to 2.8 by the assessee relate to the order of the CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance of ₹ 36 lakhs made by the Assessing Officer on account of loss on account of forgery. 36. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the Assessing Officer during the course of assessment proceedings noted that Schedule 21 of the Audit report titled extraordinary expenses s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee company the Assessing Officer held that the said loss is not an allowable expenses for the business purpose of the assessee. He therefore directed the assessee to substantiate the claim made by it. It was argued that the loss has occurred for the business purpose and therefore the same should be allowed as a deduction. The decision of Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Sasoon J. David and Company reported in 146 ITR 390 was relied upon, according to which embezzlement .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing on the decision of the Hyderabad Bench of the Tribunal in the case of VST Industries Ltd. Vs. ACIT reported in 6 taxmann.com 86 where it has been held that to claim debt as bad debt and as a deduction it should be in the respect of business which is carried on by the assessee in the relevant assessment year the Assessing Officer rejected the claim of deduction of ₹ 36 lakhs treating the same as a capital loss. 38. In appeal the Ld.CIT(A) upheld the action of the Assessing Officer. Whil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version