TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 86X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aw, referred supra, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal in view of the preliminary objection made by the learned counsel for the respondent that the monetary limit to prefer an appeal is pegged at ₹ 4,00,000/- by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Instruction No.2 of 2005, dated 24.10.2005 read with Instruction No.5 of 2007, dated 16.7.2007. - Decided against revenue. - TC (A) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... learned counsel for the respondent that the monetary limit to prefer an appeal is pegged at ₹ 4,00,000/- by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide Instruction No.2 of 2005, dated 24.10.2005 read with Instruction No.5 of 2007, dated 16.7.2007. 3. The preliminary objection of the assessee and the tax liability is as under: Preliminary objection on maintainability of Department's Tax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... apital Receipt 6,71,580 @30 % 2,01,474 SC @ 10% 20,147 2,21,621 4. The learned counsel for the assessee also pleaded that the case of the assessee does not fall within the exceptions specified in Instruction No.1979 i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is less than ₹ 4 Lakhs and that the assessee's case does not fall within the exceptions specified in Instruction No.1979, dated 27.3.2000. 6. Considering the circulars issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes and the tax effect involved in the case on hand, this Court is not inclined to entertain these appeals. Accordingly, without going into the merits of the question of law formu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
