New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (8) TMI 146 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (8) TMI 146 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - 2015 (330) E.L.T. 561 (Tri. - Ahmd.) - Disallowance of CENVAT Credit - non-receipt of material - allegation that supplier has no manufacturing facility - principle of natural justice - cross examination not allowed - extended period of limitation - levy of penalty - Held that:- It is beyond comprehension that a man will get invoices without inputs and separately acquire inputs clandestinely from other sources to manufacture his goods. There is no whisper abo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

led law that cross-examination of the persons whose witness are relied upon by the Revenue should be extended to the appellant and in the absence of such cross-examination extended, the statements of such persons can not be relied upon as evidence. - appellant M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation can not be held to have any malafide intention to take wrong credit and extended period of demand cannot be invoked in the present case against them. In this case, the demand is for the period 2005-06 whereas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

have taken any credit wrongly. Further from the case records it is observed that it is not brought out by the Revenue that at the time of issuing cenvatable invoices registered dealer did not receive inputs alongwith duty paying documents. The fact of duty being paid by M/s. Prasun Ferro Alloys & Metal Casting Pvt. Limited has not been denied by the Revenue. Though later investigations done by the department does raise a strong suspicion of not receiving the inputs but the same is not corroborat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h the appellants against OIA No. OIA-CS/89-91/DMN/NDMN/11-12 dated 11.11.2011, under which the first appellate authority has upheld the Order-in-Original dated 30.8.2010 passed by the adjudicating authority has confirmed demand by disallowing CENVAT credit of ₹ 17,96,732/- under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, alongwith interest, against M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation and also imposing equivalent amount of penalty on the appellant M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation. A penalty of ₹ 8 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, (Advocate) on behalf of his client argued that an investigation was carried out by the officers of DGCEI against M/s. Prasun Ferro Alloys & Metal Casting Pvt. Limited revealed that this manufacturer who obtained Central Excise registration was not having any plant and machinery for the manufacture of Copper Rods/ Brass rods/ Copper ingots. M/s. Prasun Ferro Alloys & Metal Casting Pvt. Limited also did not receive any inputs on which CENVAT credit was availed and manufacture was shown o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e carried Copper Rods/ Brass rods/ Copper ingots to M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation and M/s. Bhavna Metal Company were either Auto Rickshaw or transport registration numbers were not existing and that such vehicles never crossed RTO check post at Bhilad. It was the case of the learned Advocate that M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation actually received the inputs alongwith duty paying documents issued by registered dealer M/s. Bhavna Metal Company. That as per the statement of registered dealer, the docu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

further argued by the learned Advocate that as the registered dealer had received inputs as well as finished goods, therefore, extended period can not be invoked against his clients and recipient of goods who took credit on the basis of documents issued by the registered dealer and alongwith inputs mentioned in the invoices. That at the time of receipt of documents/inputs in his client s premises his client is not required to go into the details of original manufacturer from which the registered .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

na Metal Company borrowed arguments of the Advocate appearing on behalf of M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation and argued that statements of authorised persons of M/s. Prasun Ferro Alloys & Metal Casting Pvt. Limited have been recorded during investigation. That as per these statements no manufacturing activity was undertaken by M/s. Prasun Ferro Alloys & Metal Casting Pvt. Limited, therefore, inputs on which credit is taken and distributed is not admissible according to Revenue. It was his ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nts mentioned therein are not satisfied. It was his case that there is no evidence that his client M/s. Bhavna Metal Company has received inputs from any other source as no cash transaction has been brought into light by the investigation. 4. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation also furnished Xerox copies of invoices under which inputs were received, which was available before the lower authorities. It was his case that vehicle numbers on the documents are menti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r vs. R.H.L. Profiles Pvt. Limited - [2013 (292) ELT 313 (Tri. Del.)] (d) Shakti Steel Rolling Mills vs. CCE, Chandigarh - [2014 (304) ELT 109 (Tri. Del.)] (e) Nidhi Metal Auto Components Pvt. Limited vs. CCE Delhi - 2015-TIOL-667-CESTAT-DEL. 5. Shri J. Nair (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that as per the investigation undertaken by the officers of DGCEI, the original manufacturer M/s. Prasun Ferro Alloys & Metal Casting Pvt. Limited, Thane was found to be having no facility f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Metal Corporation is eligible to credit on the basis of documents which are claimed to have been received alongwith inputs issued by the registered dealer when original manufacturer M/s. Prasun Ferro Alloys & Metal Casting Pvt. Limited had no facility for manufacturing the goods on which ultimately credit was taken. There is no evidence on record that appellant M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation did not receive the inputs alongwith cenvatable invoices issued by M/s. Bhavna Metal Company. It is a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed goods in these proceedings. It is now well settled legal position that a case can not be established on the basis of few confessional statements without other corroborative evidences like shortage of raw materials, cash transactions, alternative procurement of raw materials. Appellant requested for cross-examination of the persons whose statements are relied upon but the same was not extended. It is now well settled law that cross-examination of the persons whose witness are relied upon by th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

factual matrix, appellant M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporation can not be held to have any malafide intention to take wrong credit and extended period of demand cannot be invoked in the present case against them. In this case, the demand is for the period 2005-06 whereas the show cause notice was issued on 20.02.2009. As the extended period is not invokable, therefore, the demand is also time barred in addition to credit being admissible on merits. Accordingly appeal filed by M/s. Dhakad Metal Corporat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to confiscation and such person, shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding the duty or service tax on such goods or services, as the case may be, or two thousand rupees, whichever is greater. (2) In a case, where the CENVAT credit in respect of input or capital goods or input services has been taken or utilised wrongly by reason of fraud, collusion or any wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts, or contravention of any of the provisions of the Excise Act, or of the rules made there under w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version