Home List
← Previous	Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai & Anr. Versus M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. & Ors.

2015 (8) TMI 193 - SUPREME COURT

Clandestine removal of goods - Misdeclaration of goods - Shortage of goods - Supreme Court after going through the order of CESTAT found no reason to interfere with the impugned order [2002 (10) TMI 191 - CEGAT, MUMBAI]; wherein Tribunal held that po .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is piece of evidence is there, the department has not produced any evidence to contradict the same. When direct evidence is emerging in this case, the department has failed miserably to prove that what is sold was only staple fibre. - CIVIL APPEAL NO .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

v.,Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.,Mr. Jaideep Patel, Adv.,Mr. Ashwin Dave, Adv.,Mr. S. C. Patel, Adv.,Mr. Somiran Sharma, Adv.,Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, Adv.,Mr. K. R. Sasiprabhu, Adv.,Mr. V. Lakshmikumaran, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dv.,Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv.,Mr. Gaurav Nair, Adv.,Ms. Niharika, Adv.,M/s. K. J. John & Co., Advs. ORDER After going through the impugned order of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, we find that the matters involve pure q .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X