Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (8) TMI 248 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2015 (8) TMI 248 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - 2015 (325) E.L.T. 837 (Bom.) - Validity of decision of settlement commission - Scope of section 32-E and 32-F(2) - Settlement commission closed the proceedings - Settlement Commission has found that the applicant-petitioner has not made full and true disclosure of the duty liability and the computation and calculation of the same is not in order - Under Valuation of goods - actual amortization cost of moulds was not included into the assessable value for pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ore the Central Excise Officer having jurisdiction; the manner in which the liability has been derived, the additional amount of excise duty accepted to be payable and such other particulars as may be prescribed and set out in sub-section (1) of section 32-E

Matter proceeded upto sub-section (4) of section 32-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. There are certificates which have been obtained and placed on record by both the appellant-petitioner and the Revenue. The Revenue faults the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the claim. The Bench felt that a legal settlement is not possible without going into a lot of details of the disputes as far as the methodology is concerned.

If the Revenue is not accepting the certificate or the lower amount, the Bench is then not handicapped and just cannot fold its hands in cases like the present one. It is not a dismissal based on a conclusion that the disclosure is not full and true. If it was indeed not so, there was no occasion for issuing further directions an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Delay in recovery of taxes harms the National economy and one need not over-emphasize this aspect. - matter restored before the Settlement Commission - Decided in favour of assessee. - Writ Petition No. 2870 of 2014 - Dated:- 27-7-2015 - S. C. Dharmadhikari And G. S. Kulkarni,JJ. For the Appellant : Ms Padmavati Patil For the Respondent : Mr Pradeep S Jetly JUDGMENT [Per S C Dharmadhikari, J. ] 1. We have heard both sides and with their assistance perused the Writ Petition and all annexures ther .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Daman (Union Territory). They hold a central excise registration and they clear the goods on payment of central excise duty. The petitioners are using moulds as raw materials for the purposes of manufacturing their final product and they are taking cenvat credit. The petitioners final product is used as packaging material and the duty paid by the petitioners is availed as cenvat credit by the buyers. However, what the claim of the petitioners is that one of their customers M/s. Hindustan Unilev .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t has to be properly evaluated. The petitioners produced a certificate from a Cost Accountant. This, according to the petitioners, complies with the Central Board of Excise & Customs Circular dated 23rd January, 1996, They also approached a Chartered Engineer and obtained a certificate. The petitioners received a notice to show cause dated 27th December, 2012, demanding duty in the sum of ₹ 49,90,069/- alleging that the actual amortization cost of moulds was not included into the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that compliances pre-admission are made and that is how the matter proceeded in terms of section 32-F (1). The Revenue filed a report and objecting to the computations and calculations, including raising an issue about the correctness of the certificates obtained by the petitioners. The matter was fixed by the Settlement Commission before it and on 26th March, 2014. Submissions were canvassed with regard to the Chartered Engineer's certificate. From the record it appears that the Settlement .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her scrutiny and hearing, abruptly the proceedings have been closed and with the observation at pages 51 and 52 paragraphs 9.5 and 9.6. The precise submission is that an order has been passed in terms of section 32-F(5) but what the Settlement Commission essentially has done is to reject the application as not admissible in terms of section 32-E of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The fundamental difference between the two sections and the subsections thereof has not been noticed at all. The Settle .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tatutory provisions. Therefore, the impugned order need not be set aside. 8. After hearing both sides we are unable to agree with Mr. Jetly. The Settlement Commission ought to have understood that section 32-E of the Central Excise Act, 1944, deals with application for settlement of cases and by sub-section (1) what the law postulates is a proper application to the Commission to have a case settled. The application must be in such form and must be made in such manner as is prescribed by the Rule .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ontroverted factual position would denote that the Settlement Commission reached the stage and as contemplated by section 32-F. After the application is taken as not deficient but worth admitting what has to be done thereafter is to forward to the applicant, a notice to explain why the application should be allowed to be proceeded and after taking the explanation into consideration the Settlement Commission may allow the application to be proceeded with or reject the application and the proceedi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

issionerate and the Commissionerate then, through its Commissioner is obliged to forward this report. After such a report is received, then, how the matter or application should be dealt with is provided by sub-sections (4) and (5) of the said provision viz. Section 32-F. 9. From the record it is very clear that the matter proceeded upto sub-section (4) of section 32-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. There are certificates which have been obtained and placed on record by both the appellant-peti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ly that there is no documentary evidence to support the claim. The Bench felt that a legal settlement is not possible without going into a lot of details of the disputes as far as the methodology is concerned. We do not see how such a conclusion can be reached and so quickly. If that is the conclusion reached, it was not necessary to have commented upon the conduct of the petitioner and allegedly in not coming up with honest disclosures. It should enable a settlement based on cooperation and dis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version