Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Shri Kuppayanna Swamy Agency Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Sathyamangalam

2015 (8) TMI 300 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Reversal of input tax credit - Held that:- Admittedly, the petitioner received notices in respect of the assessment years in question dated 09.10.2014 and again the respondent has issued respective notices dated 12.01.2015 and finally, the petitioner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he case, it is not known why the petitioner has not gone before the respondent with a written reply. When the petitioner appeared before the respondent, in all fairness, he should have submitted his replies. - when the petitioner has received three n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d against assessee. - W.P.Nos.18611 to 18613 of 2015, M.P.Nos.1 of 2015 - Dated:- 26-6-2015 - T. Raja, J. For the Appellant : Ms. S Radhika Chandra Sekhar For the Respondent : Mr. V Haribabu, AGP (T) ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

represented by its Partner, challenging the impugned proceedings issued by the Commercial Tax Officer, Santhyamangalam, in TIN Nos. 33362983080/2011-12 to 2013-14 respectively dated 18.05.2015. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the petitioner before passing the impugned orders. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner, who is a registered distributor of M/s PEPSICO India Pvt. Ltd., paying VAT and filing monthly returns regularly, after .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pondent, again directed the petitioner to produce sample copies of invoices in their office. She would further submit that accordingly the copies of invoices were also produced by the petitioner before the respondent. But, all of a sudden, the impugn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

provided under Sections 22, 25 and 27 of the Act. On that basis, learned counsel for the petitioner further contended that the respondent has violated the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Padinjarekara Agencies Ltd., State of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessment years in question dated 09.10.2014 and again the respondent has issued respective notices dated 12.01.2015 and finally, the petitioner was issued with the 3rd respective notices dated 24.04.2015. It is also an admitted position that the pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version