Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Systematic Intel Industries Pvt. Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Vapi

2015 (8) TMI 304 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

GTA services - Payment of freight - liability to discharge service tax burden is on supplier of goods or purchases to goods - Held that:- The observation made by the first appellate authority does not convey that the freight has been directly paid by the appellant to the transporter. Rather the invoices produced by the appellant indicate that amount of freight has been recovered from the appellant. The verification report dated 24.10.2013 made by the jurisdictional range officer also conveyed th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iberate upon. - Matter remanded back - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. : ST/11967/2014 - ORDER No. A/10533 / 2015 - Dated:- 8-5-2015 - Mr. H.K. Thakur, J. For The Appellant : Shri S.J. Vyas, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri S.K. Sikdar, Authorised Representative Per : Mr. H.K. Thakur; This appeal has been filed by the appellant with respect to OIA No. VAP-EXCUS-000-APP-586-13-14 dated 14.03.2014. Under this OIA, the first appellate authority has confirmed the demand of ₹ 3,02 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e show cause notice dated 14.03.2013 and argued that the freight charges were not paid by the appellant to the transporters but these were the charges which supplier of the goods M/s. JSW Steel Limited charged the appellant in the invoices/ bills. He made the Bench go through one such invoice No. 17007364 dated 06.10.2009 where such freight of ₹ 3,212/- was recovered from the appellant in the invoice and which was paid by M/s. JSW Steel Limited to the transporter. It was the case of the ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0.2013. It was his case that on verification, it was confirmed by the jurisdictional range officer that the supplier of the goods has charged the freight in the invoices but has given a wrong conclusion that consignee is required to pay service tax. It was the case of the appellant that required verification report dated 24.10.2013 was not given to them. Learned Advocate argued that on merits the appellant is not required to pay service tax on the amount which is not paid to the transporter. 3. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version