Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, 10 (1) , Mumbai Versus M/s. Bharat Radiators Industries Pvt. Ltd.

2015 (8) TMI 374 - ITAT MUMBAI

Proceedings u/s 154 - AO disallowed the brought forward of unabsorbed depreciation allowance - CIT(A) directed the AO to allow the assessee's claim of adjusting unabsorbed depreciation for the AY 1999-2000 from the house property income - Held that:- Any unabsorbed depreciation available to an assessee on 1st day of April 2002 (A.Y. 2002-03) will be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of section 32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001. And once the Circular No.14 of 2001 clarified that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ld. CIT(A) is based on the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of General Motors India P. Ltd (2012 (8) TMI 714 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT), and no contrary decision of any other High Court has been brought to our notice, hence such a finding of the CIT(A) is upheld. Further, as held by the High Court the unabsorbed depreciation becomes the current year depreciation, which can very well be set off against any source under any of the other heads of income during that year. - Decided agai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of AY 2004-05. The ground raised by the revenue that it has been claimed against "Income from House Property" is misconceived. - Decided against revenue. - ITA No. 1356/Mum/2013 - Dated:- 10-7-2015 - G. S. Pannu, AM And N. Amit Shukla, JM,JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Yogesh Kamat For the Respondent : Shri Sanjiv M Shah ORDER Per Amit Shukla, JM. This appeal has been filed by the Revenue against order dated 16.11.2012 passed by CIT(A)- 21, Mumbai in relation to the proceedings u/s 154 for the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ces of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)'s erred in deciding that the assessee is entitled to c/f Short Term Capital Loss of ₹ 14,48,840/- pertaining to AY 2005-06 whereas actually as per records there is a Short Term Capital Gain of ₹ 12,32,400/- for that year i.e. AY 2005-06" 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)'s erred in allowing the b/f business loss pertaining to AY 2004-05 to be set-off against income from house propert .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

epreciation allowance after observing and holding as under: "As per Section 72 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, unabsorbed loss can be carried forward and set off against any other heads of income except income under the head business or profession for more than eight assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment year for which the loss was first computed. Further, as per Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward for indefinite period and it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h could not be set off upto AY 1996-97, shall be carried forward and set off against income under the head for a maximum period of eight (8) assessment years starting from AY 1997-98 i.e. upto 2004-05". 4. The Ld. CIT(A) relying upon the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of General Motors, directed the AO to allow the assessee's claim of adjusting unabsorbed depreciation for the AY 1999-2000 from the house property income of this year after observing and holding as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ny head of the income instead of business income as in the pre-amended Act. In the ITAT Special Bench decision in the case of Times Guaranty Ltd., it is held that unabsorbed depreciation of AY 1997-98 upto 2001-02 can only be adjusted from the business income of the appellant. But this decision was overturned by the Gujarat High Court in the case of General Motors India P Ltd vs DCIT 25 Taxman.com 364 (Guj) wherein it was held as under: "We are of the considered opinion that any unabsorbed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns of sec. 32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001 and were available to carry forward and set off against the profits and gains of subsequent years, without any limit whatsoever. In view of the above Gujarat High Court decision, I could not find any contradictory decision on this issue, therefore, I direct the AO to allow the appellant's claim of adjusting unabsorbed depreciation of AY 1999-2000 form the house property income of this year. These grounds of appeal are allowed". 5. After c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to be carried forward to the succeeding years, and if any unabsorbed depreciation or part thereof could not be set off till the A.Y. 2002-03 then it would be carried forward till the time it is set off against the profits and gains of subsequent years. 38. Therefore, it can be said that, current depreciation is deductible in the first place from the income of the business to which it relates. If such depreciation amount is larger than the amount of the profits of that business, then such excess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is added to the current depreciation for such succeeding year and is deemed as part thereof. If, however, there is no current depreciation for such succeeding year, the unabsorbed depreciation becomes the depreciation allowance for such succeeding year. We are of the considered opinion that any unabsorbed depreciation available to an assessee on 1st day of April 2002 (A.Y. 2002-03) will be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of section 32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001. And once the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

atsoever. 6. Thus, the finding of the Ld. CIT(A) is based on the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of General Motors India P. Ltd (supra), and no contrary decision of any other High Court has been brought to our notice, hence such a finding of the CIT(A) is upheld. Further, as held by the High Court the unabsorbed depreciation becomes the current year depreciation, which can very well be set off against any source under any of the other heads of income during that year. 7. R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version