Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Tec Paper Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India & 1

Validity of order of the tribunal - The matter was heard by the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal, however, the decision has been delivered by the Member (Technical) of the Tribunal, who had never dealt with the case in past. - Clandestine removal - Recovery of note book - invoice with new serial number inserted - Held that:- when the appeal was already heard and reserved for orders and the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal had directed the registry for re-listing the matter for the certain clar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

UPREME COURT OF INDIA] and in the case of Union of India & Ors. V. Shiv Raj & Ors. reported in [2014 (5) TMI 1036 - Supreme Court Of India]. The Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal was the best person to decide the matter only after getting some clarification, which he intended to get from the either party as he had put remarks on 25.10.2013. - order impugned in the petition is required to be quashed and set aside - matter remanded back. - It is hereby made clarified that the matter shall be h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arned advocates for the respective parties. 2. Rule. Mr. Lodha, Central Government Standing Counsel waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No. 1 and Mr. R.J.Oza, learned Senior Advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No. 2. 3. With the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 4. By way of the present petition filed under Articles 14, 19,226, 265 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, the pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiamainly on the two grounds, which are as under. (i) Though, the matter was heard and was kept for order, the same was again taken up for hearing and was decided in absence of the petitioner (original respondent No.1) (ii) The matter was heard by the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal, however, the decision has been delivered by the Member (Technical) of the Tribunal, who had never dealt with the case in past. 5. The brief facts arise fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the officers of the respondent department found to be tempered with. 5.2. A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. Subsequent to production of documentary evidence, the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Ahmedabad - III dropped the proceedings by order dated 06.05.2005, which was challenged before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) who confirmed the order passed by the authority. Both the orders have been challenged by the respondent - revenue before the Tribunal by way .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e filed affidavit-in-reply and there to, affidavit-in-re-joinder has been filed by the petitioner. 7. Mr. Dhaval Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner would submit that though the matter was heard by the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal, the matter was again listed before the Member (Technical) of the Tribunal on 07.3.2014, of which the petitioner was not aware about the date of hearing and therefore, the matter was heard ex-parte and the decision was rendered on 11.04.2015 by the Member (T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cations. Instead of re-listing the mater on board of the Member (Judicial) of the Tribunal, the same was listed before the Member (Technical) of the Tribunal, who had ultimately decided the matter in absence of the petitioner or his advocate. 9. In support of his case, he has also produced order sheet, Rojkam of 20.09.2013 as well as 07.03.2013, which shows the dates of listing the matter on board. 10. Learned advocate for the petitioner would further submit that the Member (Judicial) of the Tri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mpugned in this petition be quashed and set aside and the matter be remanded for fresh consideration. 11. As far as first contention raised by the petitioner is concerned, Mr.R.J.Oza, learned senior advocate, appearing for respondent No. 2 would submit that first contention raised by the petitioner is without any basis since a notice, for fresh hearing, was issued to the petitioner by UPC and the same was received on behalf of the petitioner. In support of the contention, he has produced documen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, he should have appeared before the Tribunal and ought to have argued the matter on merits. He would further submit that neither the petitioner nor his advocate remained present on the date of hearing on 07.03.2014 and therefore, the petition is merit less and is required to be dismissed. 13. We have heard learned advocates for the respective parties .Perused the order sheet, Rojkam dated 20.09.2013 and07.03.2014. It appears from the order sheet that the matter was heard before the Member (Judi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version