Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sony India Pvt. Ltd. And Others Versus The Commissioner of Trade And Taxes And Others

Pre-Determination – Deemed Waiver – Appellant was informed that next date of hearing would be intimated later, but no subsequent date of hearing was indicated by commissioner – Since Commissioner failed to make any determination within prescribed period, proposed determination as indicated by Appellant would have been deemed to be issued by Commissioner – Whether tribunal was justified in holding that there was deemed waiver of application for pre-determination – Held that:- three conditions wer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ver of deemed application for predetermination – Appellant would nevertheless not have been able to avail benefit of Section 84(6), since Appellant did not satisfy condition (b) under Section 84 (6) – Determination of tax and interest by VATO upheld, but levy of penalty and corresponding interest on such penalty amount set aside – Petition disposed of.

Classification of DSCs – Fixation of Taxation rate – Whether Tribunal was right in holding that Digital Still Image Video camera was n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

it read could not be said to have included DSCs – Therefore impugned order of AT upholding determination of VAT and interest thereon not interfered with – AT was right in holding that DSCs was not classified and covered by Entry No 41 or 41A – Decided partially in favour of Assesse.

(30th November 2005 to 31st December 2007)

Bracket preceding words 'other than' in Item 15 of Entry 41 A, closing with bracket after words 'digital still image video cameras' was certainly unique to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1A to DVAT Act was to read it without two brackets and to read it in manner that item 'digital still image video cameras' was not excluded from ambit of Entry 15 – Thus period between 30th November 2005 to 31st December 2007, Appellant would be liable to pay 4% tax and not 12.5% on turnover of sales of DSCs – Decision of Tribunal and VATO hereby set aside – Neither interest nor penalty would be liable to be paid – Decided in favour of Assesse. - ST Appeal No. 29/2013, ST Appeal No. 31/2013 - D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and ST Appeal No. 29 of 2103 pertains to the period 30th November 2005 to 31st December 2007. 2. At the hearing of these appeals on 30th July 2013 (along with ST Appeal No.30 of 2013 which pertained to the period 8th August 2005 to 9th November 2005) the Court framed the following questions of law: i) Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that Digital Still Image Video camera is not classified and covered by Entry No.41 or 41A (Description 15)? ii) Whether the Tribunal was right in holding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue Added Tax Act, 2004 ('DVAT Act') and is engaged in the sale of wide range of electronic items and information technology ('IT') products across India including Delhi. The appeals concerns the sale by the Appellant of DSCs which according to the Appellant operate on a software system and the pictures of which are processed by a computer system to which the DSCs can be attached through USB cable. 5. At the outset it requires to be noted that the dispute concerning the rate of VA .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed for the 'Delhi Tax Compliance Achievement Scheme 2013' and one of the contentions were availing of the benefit under the said scheme so that any appeal filed by the Assessee would have to be withdrawn. Accordingly, by order dated 9th July 2015, this Court dismissed ST Appeal No. 30 of 2013 as withdrawn. Consequently, the present judgment is in respect of ST Appeals 29 and 31 of 2013 pertaining to the periods 30th November 2005 to 31st December 2007 and 1st April 2005 to 7th August 200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

roducts notified by the Ministry of IT as specified below: Sr. No. Description (1) (2) (vii) Transmission apparatus other than apparatus for radio or T.V. broadcasting 8. According to the Appellant since at the relevant time the expression 'IT product' was not defined in the DVAT Act, the definition in the Information Technology Agreement ('ITA') of the World Trade Organisation ('WTO'), to which India is a signatory, required to be referred to for ascertaining the definit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

record images in digital form... Some digital cameras have the ability to record sequential images with or without an accompanying soundtrack, in a manner similar to video camera recorder. However, this recording capability is limited and it is not their primary function," 10. The Central Board of Excise and Customs ('CBEC') had issued a notification dated 1st March 2005 which provided a list of IT products which are exempt from customs duty. This list included DSCs covered under t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or sub-headings mentioned in column(3), as the case may be, of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) Sr.No. Description Central Excise Tariff Heading 15. Transmission apparatus (other than apparatus for radio broadcasting, transmission apparatus incorporating reception apparatus, digital still image video cameras) 8525 Note-(1) The Rules for the interpretation of the provisions of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 read with the Explanatory Notes as updated from time to time publishe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pe of this notification and other commodities though covered by the corresponding description in the Central Excise Tariff will not be covered by the scope of this notification. Note-(3) Subject to Note (2), for the purpose of any entry contained in this notification, where the description against any heading, or as the case may be, sub heading, matches fully with the corresponding description in the Central Excise Tariff, then all the commodities covered for the purposes of the said Tariff unde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iable to pay penalty under Section 86 (12) of the DVAT Act. The objection filed by the Appellant to the above notices was rejected by the Joint Commissioner-I, Value Added Tax Deptt. (KDU, Policy) by an order dated 16th May 2006 holding that the DSC was not covered in any schedule to the DVAT Act and was accordingly taxable at 12.5%. Aggrieved by the above order, the Appellant filed VAT Appeals No.36-40/ATVAT/06-07 and 323-332/ATVAT/08-09 in respect of the tax, interest and penalty. 13. As far a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o the above order were rejected by the Additional Commissioner- III by order dated 29th August 2008. Against the said order the Appellant filed VAT Appeal Nos.419-420, 232-241 and 455-480, both in respect of the tax, interest and penalty before the AT. Impugned order of the AT 14. By the common impugned order dated 9th April 2013, the AT held as follows: (i) As regards the demand for the period from 1st April 2005 to 7th August 2005, no inference regarding deemed acceptance by the Commissioner o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(ii) As regards the period between 1st April 2005 to 7th August 2005, relying on the judgment of the Karnataka High Court in Diebold Systems (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of CT (2006) 144 STC 59, it was held that in terms of the natural meaning of the language used in Entry 41, DSCs was not covered in the said entry as an IT product. (iii) On the question whether under Entry 41 A Clause 15 DSCs was an IT product for the period with effect from 30th November 2005 onwards, the AT held against the Appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n. Deemed determination by the Commissioner 15. As regards the period from 1st April 2005 to 7th August 2005, in respect of which ST Appeal No. 31 of 2013 has been filed, in addition to the common question whether the natural meaning of the language used in Entry 41 covered DSCs as an IT product, the Appellant has raised the question of deemed acceptance of the determination application of the Appellant under Section 84 (5) read with Section 84 (6) of the DVAT Act and Rule 58(5) of the DVAT Rule .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cation was fixed for hearing on 25th January 2006. The Appellant's counsel sought adjournment as he was not available beyond 1 pm on that date. He was informed that the next date of hearing would be intimated later, but no subsequent date of hearing was indicated. It is contended by the Appellant that since the Commissioner failed to make any determination within the prescribed period, the proposed determination as indicated by the Appellant would be deemed to have been issued by the Commiss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the determinable question occurred. Under Section 84(5), the Commissioner has to mandatorily decide the determination application within the prescribed period. Under Rule 58 (5) of the DVAT Rules, the Commissioner is required to pass an order on the said application within the period of six months from the date of the submission of question, failing which Section 84(6) would apply. 18. Section 84(6) of the DVAT Act reads as under: " .... Where - (a) the Commissioner fails to make a determ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

shall be deemed for the purposes of this Act to have made and issued to the person on the day after the expiry of the prescribed period, a determination of the determinable question in the terms of the proposed determination." 19. A careful perusal of Section 84(6) of the Act reveals that there are three conditions to be satisfied cumulatively; (a) the Commissioner must fail to decide the application for determination within a period of six months after it has been submitted; (b) After the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

determination in terms of the proposed determination will not come into play. 20. In the present case while conditions (a) and (c) above were satisfied, condition (b) was not. The Court here concurs with the finding of the AT as far as condition (a) is concerned that the Appellant did not withdraw its determination application on 29th January 2006. The Court is also prepared to accept the plea of the Appellant that by merely filing another request application on 8th July 2008, it cannot be held .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. In the present case, the application for determination was made on 8th August 2005 in respect of all transactions that took place between 1st April 2005 and 7th August 2005. Admittedly, the Appellant had already applied to those transactions the proposed determination of the rate tax at 4% . The Appellant did not wait to do that till such time the Commissioner failed to decide the application i.e., after the expiry of six months after 8th August 2005. In that view of the matter, with condition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m "IT products' includes DSCs, then for the period under consideration the rate of VAT that would apply is 4%. If not, the rate would be 12.5% 23. During the aforementioned period 1st April 2005 to 7th August 2005, Entry 41 included IT products including computers, telephone and parts thereof, tele-printer and wireless equipment and parts thereof. Although DSCs do not find mention in Entry 41, it is urged by the Appellant that IT products listed in the ITA included DSCs under tariff hea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y for Clarification and Advance Ruling in terms of the AP VAT Act 2005 issued an order on the application of the Appellant holding that DSCs attract the Harmonised System of Nomenclature ('HSN') Code 8525 and are liable to tax at 4% in accordance with Entry 39 (15) of Schedule IV of the AP VAT Act. 25. As far as the first contention is concerned, the Court finds that the term IT products has been described to include computers, peripherals etc but not DSCs which are distinct species as i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e case of the Revenue as far as the period between 1st April to 7th August 2005 is concerned. There the Court was examining the question whether an ATM machine was a 'computer' with reference to Entry 20 (2) (b) of Part C of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka VAT Act, 2003 captioned 'Computer Terminals'. The Assessee there sought to rely on the definition of the expression 'computers' in the Information Technology Act, 2000 in support of the plea for an expanded interpr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and not computer peripherals. 27. Applying the above test, it can safely be concluded that as regards the period 1st April to 7thAugust 2005, since Entry 41 only talked of IT products in the broad sense of including computers, telephone and parts thereof, tele-printer and wireless equipment and parts thereof etc. and not DSCs, the plea of the Appellant that DSCs are IT products must fail. 28. As regards the second contention, the Court observes that the wording of Entry 15 of Schedule IV of Seri .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on various kinds of IT products were notified for the concessional rate of duty @ 4%. The product at Serial No. 15 of this notification more or less reads like Clause 15 under Entry 41A of the DVAT Act with effect from 29th November 2005 but without the brackets. 29. The upshot of the above discussion is that the wording of the Entry 41 in the DVAT Act prior to 29th November 2005 cannot be read in the manner suggested by the Appellant. Prior to the change brought about with effect from 30th Nove .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be characterised as a deliberate attempt to avoid paying the applicable rate of VAT so as to warrant the levy of penalty. Conclusion as regards ST App 31 of 2013 31. In respect of ST Appeal No. 31 of 2013, in respect of the period from 1st April 2005 to 7th August 2005, the three questions of law are answered as under: (i) The AT was right in holding that DSCs is not classified and covered by Entry No 41 or 41A; (ii) Although the AT was not right in holding that there was a waiver of the deemed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to charge the concessional rate of tax at 4%. (iv) Resultantly, as far ST Appeal No.31 of 2013 for the period 1st April 2005 to 7th August 2005 is concerned, the determination of tax and interest by the VATO is upheld, but the levy of penalty and the corresponding interest on such penalty amount is hereby set aside. The period 30th November 2005 to 31st December 2007 32. Now turning to ST Appeal No. 29 of 2013 for the period 30th November 2005 to 31st December 2007, the question arises whether D .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d based on video camera recorder technology. It records, processes and stores images in digital format. It features a built-in, high resolution. 1.8" colour LCD screen that is used as a viewfinder when shooting images and as a monitor when viewing recorded or uploaded images. The images can be transferred to an automatic data processing machine by means of an optional accessory package for viewing and storing on an automatic data processing machine. For this purpose it has been designed wit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

85 relating to ITA bound expositions. By a circular dated 10th September 2007, there was a clarification issued by the CBEC on exemption to DSCs. There was a doubt whether the entry covered "such digital cameras which are capable of both still image figure as well as video shooting". The circular clarified that DSCs fall under tariff item 8525 8020 but DSCs that can take still images and moving images like camcorder and video recorder would fall under 8525 8030. The White Paper 35. Ho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ommon to all the States. The said features were to constitute the basic design of VAT. It was expected that at the same time, the States would have freedom for appropriate variations consistent with the basic design. The White Paper was a collective attempt of the States to strike a balance between this need for commonality and the desired federal flexibility in the VAT structure. 36. In para 1.4 of the White Paper, the methodology adopted by the Empowered Committee in preparing the White Paper .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under 4% VAT rate category, there will be the largest number of goods (about 270), common for all the States, comprising of items of basic necessities such as medicines and drugs, all agricultural and industrial inputs, capital goods and declared goods". 37. The list of goods with 4% floor rate as finalized by the Empowered Committee of State Finance Minister contains about 41 items under the table "Goods with 4% Floor Rate". A copy of this is to be found in Annexure-1, Discussion .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

three types of IT products i.e. (i) transmission apparatus other than apparatus for radio broadcasting or TV broadcasting; (ii) transmission apparatus incorporating reception apparatus; (iii) digital still image video cameras. Corresponding entries of other state legislations 39. This Court has been shown VAT legislations of the States and in particular, the legislations of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Gujarat, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Mizoram and Orissa. The above basic entry in the list final .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ophone (d) Still image video cameras & other video camera recorders; digital cameras." 40. Entry 15 in Part B of Schedule II of Assam VAT legislation reproduces Entry 85.25 of the list prepared by the Empowered Committee. In other words there is absolutely no change including the placement of commas. Turning to the Bihar legislation, Part II of Schedule III has Entry 14 which reproduces the entry as per the Empowered Committee with one addition of 'cellular telephone'. The Gujar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

separated by semi colon rather than comas. The Maharashtra legislation reproduces Sub-item 85.25 as it is. The Mizoram legislation again reproduces Sub-item 85.25 as recommended by the Empowered Committee. The Orissa VAT Amendment Act 2005 which encloses Entry 69(O) in Part II reproduces the exact wording of Sub-item 85.25. 41. The above narration is useful in understanding that there is a uniform adoption by several states of the entries as recommended by the Empowered Committee particularly wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A, closing with the bracket after the words 'digital still image video cameras' is certainly unique to the Delhi statute. The exercise was to find whether this was a mere misprint. 43. When the file was produced before the Court on 11th November 2014, the Court noted as under: 'Relevant file has been produced. As per the said file the bracketed portion end with the words "digital still image video cameras" but there is no coma between digital still image and video cameras. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

notes that led to the drafting of the relevant entries of the DVAT Act". At the hearing on 16th July 2015, the file was produced by the Respondent. There is a note in the file prepared on 10th October 2005, with specific reference to amendment to the Third Schedule of the DVAT Act. Under para (M) (ii), it is noted that a representation has been received from "Progressive Channels Association of Information Technology" pointing out two ambiguities in Entry No. 41A and that importan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

SN codes along with the items describing I.T. products". In other words the proposal was that the description as adopted by Maharashtra and the corresponding HSN codes should be adopted for Delhi as well. 45. The draft notifications incorporating the changes by way of amendment along with the draft Cabinet Note was placed before the Legislative Council for being placed before the Council of Ministers. The Cabinet Note repeats what is stated in the note and appends the proposed substitute en .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r 2005. The amendment was notified on 30th November 2005 in the Gazette. The file, therefore, is unhelpful in knowing the real reasons why the brackets were added particularly when the intention of following the Maharashtra legislation is evident from the notes on file. 46. To recapitulate as far as Entry 15 to the notification issued under the Maharashtra VAT Act 2002, Entry 85.25 is a replica of the corresponding entry as proposed by the Empowered Committee. That being the factual position the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

In other words, the entry is sought to be read by the Department as essentially containing only one item, viz., 'transmission apparatus' with all other items contained in the brackets that immediately follow the said words as being excluded from the entry. Interpreting Item 15 of Entry 41-A 48. As rightly pointed out by Mr. Tarun Gulati, learned counsel for the Appellant, it appears that this was a mistake. The brackets, if at all should have been closed immediately after the expression .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#39;transmission apparatus'. Therefore the exclusion of such item from 'transmission apparatus' makes no sense at all. A 'transmission apparatus' refers to something which is capable of receiving the transmission signals. For e.g., a walkie talkie set or a cellular phone. A DSC does neither. It falls outside the category of transmission apparatus. This explains why in some state legislations, following the description in the list prepared by the Empowered Committee, these ite .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that it renders the brackets, which have been consciously inserted, otiose. He referred to the decision of this Court in N.G. Sheth v. CBI 151 (2008) DLT 789, which discusses the implications of use of the phrase 'other than'. He submitted that although the brackets may be superfluous they were meant to emphasise the exclusion of all items within the brackets from the main entry, viz., transmission apparatus. 50. In the first place, the submission on behalf of the Respondent that insert .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ashtra statute contains any brackets preceding the words 'other than' or succeeding the words 'video cameras'. The addition of brackets appears to be unintended. Secondly, there can be no doubt that DSCs are not transmission apparatus and therefore the brackets could not have brought out the unintended result of excluding such equipment, viz., DSCs from the first item viz., 'transmission apparatus'. 51. In the present case, the brackets really do not serve any particular .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

themselves do not control the meaning of a statute when its meaning is otherwise obvious". In Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. (2010) 8 SCC 241 the Supreme Court dealt with at length on the basic rules of interpretation of statutes. While the general rule was that provisions which are clear and unambiguous should be given their plain and normal meaning "without adding or rejecting any words", there was an exception to that general rule. It w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n in a statute, courts prefer to assume that the draftsman had committed a mistake rather than concluding that the Legislature has deliberately introduced an absurd or irrational statutory provision. Departure from the literal rule of plain and straight reading can however be only in exceptional cases, where the anomalies make the literal compliance of a provision impossible, or absurd or so impractical as to defeat the very object of the provision. We may also mention purposive interpretation t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e, which can hardly have been intended, a construction may be put upon it which modifies the meaning of the words, and even the structure of the sentence. This may be done by departing from the rules of grammar, by giving an unusual meaning to particular words, or by rejecting them altogether, on the ground that the legislature could not possibly have intended what its words signify, and that the modifications made are mere corrections of careless language and really give the true meaning. Where .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

results which could not have been intended by the Legislature". Quoting the opinion of Lord Reid in Luke vs. IRC (1966 AC 557), it was said 'Where to apply words literally would "defeat the obvious intention of the legislation and produce a wholly unreasonable result" we must "do some violence to the words" and so achieve that obvious intention and produce a rational construction'. 54. In the present case the Court is persuaded to adopt the above approach in orde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

entry and that clearly was not the intended result. The Cabinet Note itself was triggered by the representation of the industry regarding exclusion of certain kinds of IT products. Also the intention was to adopt the Maharashtra pattern which did not exclude DSCs. The uniform pattern adopted by several states to bring the statutes in line with the nomenclature as suggested by the Empowered Committee meant that DSCs were not to be excluded from the list of items which would be subject to 4% tax. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version