Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. GAC Shipping (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-1 (2) , Kochi and The DCIT, Kochi Versus M/s. GAC Shipping (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Disallowance of network support service charges - non deduction of TDS for payment of the same before due date of filing the return - Held that:- There is no dispute that the assessee is liable to deduct TDS on the amount paid to the parent company M/s. GAC Shipping Co., Vaduz, Greece towards international network support service charges and technical fees. The assessee made the provision in the books of account and credited to the party's account on the last date of the financial year. The time .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld that:- In this case, the purchase bill for the software was dated December 31, 2005. However, the assessee took the plea that the software was installed before September 30, 2005. However, no evidence is placed before us to show that the software was installed and payment was made before September 30, 2005 so as to own the software and use it for business purposes. Hence, the applicable rate of depreciation is to be 50 per cent. of the prescribed rate arrived at by the lower authorities - Dec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ames in its books of account would not establish the genuineness of such liabilities. On the other hand, the Assessing Officer went to the root of the issue and came to the conclusion that the alleged creditors were not genuine. The assessee was not able to establish the existence of these liabilities. In the circumstances, the lower authorities are justified in treating the liabilities as income under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act. Being so, the lower authorities are justified in holding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

advantage in the nature of agency. It is not necessary that the assessee should have final result. Admittedly in this case, the business was secured by the assessee from Hamburg Sued Line Germany and was terminated for which the assessee has received compensation from the parent company. The purpose of incurring expenditure was to acquire a capital asset. In this case, an unforeseen cancellation of agreement and receipt of compensation cannot be set off against capital expenditure because such r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Being so, the compensation received on termination of the agency business cannot be said to be capital receipt. Hence the treatment given by AO of the expenses incurred for securing the business as capital expenditure and the receipt of compensation on termination of the agency business as revenue in nature is justified - Decided against assessee.

Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - payments made outside India, on which TDS is not made/remitted within the due date - software development an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nditure, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) allowed the same. In our opinion, it is proper to remit the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in the light of the fresh evidence produced before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). Accordingly, this issue is remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. - Decided in favour of revenue for statistical purposes.

Addition being contributions to group gratuity fund - CIT(A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

whether the payment has been made to the LIC towards gratuity fund. - Decided in favour of revenue for statistical purposes.

Amount written off which represent amount advanced to an ex-employee of the assessee - CIT(A) delted addition - Held that:- If the debt has not been taken into account while computing the income of the assessee in the previous year or in any previous year in which the amount of such debt is written off, the bad debt claim of the assessee cannot be allowed. Bein .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

61 /Coch/2014 - Dated:- 6-3-2015 - S/SHRI N.R.S.GANESAN AND CHANDRA POOJARI, JJ. For the Appellant : Shri R.Sreenivasan, CA For the Respondent : Shri K.K. John, Sr. DR ORDER Chandra Poojari (Accountant Member).- The appeals in I. T. A. Nos.803/Coch/2013 and 317/Coch/2014 are cross-appeals directed against the order dated October 20, 2013 passed by the Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals)-II, Kochi for the assessment year 2006-07. The appeal in I. T. A. No. 804/Coch/2013 filed by the assessee is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llowance of network support service charges on the reason that there was no deduction of TDS for payment of the same before due date of filing the return. 3. The brief facts of the issue are that an amount of ₹ 21,26,805 claimed by the assessee under the head administrative expenses towards fees for international network support charges was disallowed by the Assessing Officer as the approval from the Government of India has not been obtained for payment of such sum outside India. Further, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance for payment of international network support service fees to M/s. Gulf Agency Company Ltd. but existence of such approval in no way connected with the taxability of this amount for the Income-tax purposes. Further, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that the amount was actually paid to the party and credited to the party's account before March 31, 2006 i.e., during this assessment year without deducting tax on the same. Since the payment wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct in invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(i) of the Act. The learned authorised representative submitted that the expenditure is not in the nature of statutory liability coming within the meaning of section 43B so as to warrant disallowance. 5.1. The learned Departmental representative relied on the order of the lower authorities. 6. We have heard both parties and perused the record. In this case, there is no dispute that the assessee is liable to deduct TDS on the amount of ₹ 21,26,8 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee. Being so, the provisions of section 40(a)(i) is applicable. Hence, in our opinion, the lower authorities are justified in disallowing the expenditure on this count. This ground of the assessee is dismissed. 7. However, the learned authorised representative submitted before us that the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 is retrospective in nature so disallowance is unwarranted as the tax has been remitted within the due date of filing of the return. However, we a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tax at source is not so strict if they are able to show that the payee or the recipient of the amount has paid tax in accordance with the provisions of section 201(1) and the proviso. 6. This was not the claim made by the assessee before the Assessing Officer. The claim was on a different stand, initially reflecting the amounts as loan in the account books though shown as freight charges in the returns and later explained that it was not the loan amount but freight charges. It was never the case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty would only indicate the real intention of the assessee-firm i.e., not to disclose this amount as freight charges but something else as repayment of loan." 7.1. In view of the above judgment of the jurisdictional High Court, we are inclined to decide the issue against the assessee. Further, in this case, the assessee is required to remit the deducted tax before the expiry of time limit prescribed under sub-section (1) of section 200 read with rule 30 which is not complied with by the asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

year and hence, restricted the depreciation to 50 per cent. of the eligible sum (30 per cent.). 9. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) confirmed the same. 10. The learned authorised representative submitted that the software was installed much earlier and the invoice was received only later and accounted on December 31, 2005. The learned authorised representative submitted that depreciation is to be allowed at 60 per cent. for full year on ₹ 22,43,000 towards cost of softw .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for business purposes. Hence, the applicable rate of depreciation is to be 50 per cent. of the prescribed rate arrived at by the lower authorities. Accordingly, this ground of the assessee is dismissed. 13. The last ground is with regard to disallowance made under section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act on the amount outstanding in the name of sundry creditors. 14. The brief facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer noticed that the amount of ₹ 10,61,041 relating to old balance carried .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the financial year 2005-06 relevant to this assessment year, it was noticed that such sum has not been credited to the profit and loss account. The assessee's counsel clarified that this sum, as well as the unpaid/outdated cheques were treated as income of the financial year ending March 31, 2008. There is no dispute that the above liabilities have ceased to exist and are no longer payable. Since the sums have already been claimed as expenditure and as on March 31, 2006 itself, they were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

would have been subsequently settled with the principals. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) observed that in any case since the refund of this amount was received by the assessee in this year, the same has to be taxed in this assessment year and not in financial year ending March 31, 2008. As regards cheques issued but cancelled, when the cheques were cancelled in the year 2005-06, the Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals) observed that the effect of such cancellation needs to have been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ave been claimed as expenditure in any of the earlier years, the provisions of section 41(1) are not applicable. The learned authorised representative submitted that as regards disallowance of ₹ 5.29 lakhs, only an amount of ₹ 45,204 has been written back in the financial year 2008-09 and an amount of ₹ 4,83,568 and ₹ 875.94 have been reissued to the concerned parties in October 2006 and June 2006 and therefore cannot be treated as income of the assessee. According to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cover the dues if it is a genuine liability. In this case, the liability is outstanding in the books of account of the assessee year after year. 17.1. The hon'ble Delhi High Court as per its recent decision in the case of CIT v. Chipsoft Technology P. Ltd. [2012] 210 Taxman 173 (Del), examining the legal aspect of the matter, has clarified that the view that merely because a liability outstands in books, and that lapse of time bars the remedy but does not efface the liability, is an abstract .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

drawn balance-sheet based on its books of account in which the above amounts were being claimed as liabilities due to the various parties as at the end of the accounting year under dispute. However, the assessee failed to establish the genuineness of these liabilities by citing credible evidence. Simply the liabilities being reflected against certain names in its books of account would not establish the genuineness of such liabilities. On the other hand, the Assessing Officer went to the root o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ist. Hence, we do not find any infirmity in the orders of the lower authorities and accordingly, this ground of the assessee is rejected. Accordingly, the assessee appeal in I. T. A. No. 803/Coch/2013 is dismissed. I. T. A. No. 804/Coch/2013-Assessee's appeal (assessment year 2008-09 18. The first ground in I. T. A. No. 804/Coch/2013 is with regard to treatment of the expenditure incurred for obtaining the linear agency business as capital expenditure and treatment of amount of compensation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

course of carrying on of the business and was very much incidental to the business activities of the assessee and hence it is not capital expenditure. With regard to the business amortisation expenses, the assessee paid for the liner business an amount of ₹ 1,30,17,000 on two occasions. On June 3, 2005, the agency business of Adsteam was lost to the assessee for which they paid an amount of ₹ 59,69,040 and an amount of ₹ 2,18,000 was amortised during financial year 2004-05. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he company is capital in nature. 19.1. Regarding compensation of ₹ 59,69,040 received on termination of the agency, the Assessing Officer treated this amount as revenue in nature. The Assessing Officer holding that one expenditure being capital in nature and another in revenue, the payment was made to one party and compensation is received from another party, held that the two payments cannot be netted off. According to the Assessing Officer, the payment made for acquiring the agency right .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on its own not treated part of this expenditure as revenue and hence there is no justification of treating in the nature of revenue expenditure in the subsequent year. The learned Departmental representative submitted that the copy of agreement clearly reveals that it is a case of transfer of agency for which proper "agency agreement" was signed and hence the payment is clearly for acquiring the agency rights. According to the learned Departmental representative, the agency has been ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e relied on the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of M. K. Brothers Private Ltd. v. CIT [1972] 86 ITR 38 (SC) and CIT v. Jalan Trading Co. P. Ltd. [1985] 155 ITR 536 (SC) holding that payment for a sole selling agency is capital in nature. Thus, according to the learned Departmental representative, expenditure for acquiring agency rights has rightly been treated as capital in nature even though it got terminated at an early stage. According to the learned Departmental representative, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee lost the business of Hamburg Sued Agency on June 30, 2005. On termination of the agency, the assessee received compensation of ₹ 59,69,040 from the parent company. The assessee set off the compensation received out of the payment made for the purpose of securing the agency business and claimed the amount as revenue expenditure. Admittedly, the assessee paid an amount of ₹ 1,30,17,000 for the purpose of securing the agency business which brought enduring benefit to the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

asset or advantage in the nature of agency. It is not necessary that the assessee should have final result. Admittedly in this case, the business was secured by the assessee from Hamburg Sued Line Germany and was terminated for which the assessee has received compensation from the parent company. The purpose of incurring expenditure was to acquire a capital asset. The true test to be applied is that the expenses incurred for the purpose of, or with a view to, acquiring a capital asset whether i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and has nothing to do with acquiring of agency. The compensation received by other than the person to whom payment was made and received on termination of the agency agreement has nothing to do with the expenditure made towards securing agency business. Being so, the compensation received on termination of the agency business cannot be said to be capital receipt. Hence, in our opinion, the treatment given by the Assessing Officer of the expenses incurred for securing the business as capital exp .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the case are that the assessee has claimed an amount of ₹ 22,43,000 as fees for technical services. The sum has been paid to M/s. GAC Vaduz outside India. The tax deducted on the above payment was remitted only on June 2, 2006. As per the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, payments made outside India, on which TDS is not made/remitted within the due date, would not be allowed as an expenditure in computing the assessee's income Since the tax was not remitted in the above cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

this expenditure was not claimed as revenue expenditure and hence there is no basis for disallowing the same. The assessee further submitted that the entire fee for network support charges and technical services amounting to ₹ 21,26,805 has already been disallowed by the Assessing Officer. 27. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) observed that the payment of the amount of ₹ 22,43,000 is the cost of software development and licences for various modules and the assessee claimed th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-tax (Appeals), while computing these charges as network fee, the assessee computed the amount at 8 per cent. of the operating profit, i.e.,2,78,85,067 x 8 per cent. = ₹ 22,30,805 and as in this heading the assessee has not mentioned the heading of technical services fee, the Assessing Officer treated and mistook this amount as network support fee only and made the separate addition on account of technical services fees. 28. We have heard both parties and perused the record. The expenditur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n our opinion, it is proper to remit the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in the light of the fresh evidence produced before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). Accordingly, this issue is remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Accordingly, the Revenue's appeal in I. T. A. No. 317/Coch/2014 is partly allowed for statistical purposes. I. T. A. No. 361/Coch/2014-Revenue's appeal (assessment year 2008-09) 29. The fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ew of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Textool Co. Ltd. (2013) (35 taxman 639), the expenditure is to be allowed. 32. We have heard both the parties and perused the record. The expenditure was disallowed by the Assessing Officer on the reason that the amount was contributed to the group gratuity fund which was not approved by the Commissioner. Before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), the assessee took the plea that it has been paid to LIC of India towards gratuity. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ground of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes. 33. The next ground is with regard to the amount of ₹ 3,32,116 written off which represent amount advanced to an ex-employee of the assessee. 34. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee has claimed and written off ₹ 14,24,276 as bad debt. On a perusal, it was seen that ₹ 3,32,116 was an amount paid to an employee. It was noticed that to claim any amount as bad debt it should have been credited as incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 22th September, 2017

Forum: Trans1 return

News: Exchange Rate of Foreign Currency Relating To Imported and Export Goods Notified

Forum: Credit on Repair of Company Car & Its Insurance

Circular: Promote the officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) to the grade of Principal commissioner of customs, GST & CX

Circular: Allocate the charges amongst the Members of the Central Board of Excise and Customs

Circular: Strategy for audits in 2017-18 consequent to GST - Audit by Central Excise and service Department to continue for the accounting year 2016-17 and for the past period

Circular: Appoint the IRS (C&CE) officers as Principal Commissioner (Revision Application) and ex-officio Additional Secretary

Circular: Time limit for filing intimation for composition levy under Rule 3(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 extended to 16-8-2017

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

Circular: C.B.E. & C. Advisory on Customs related matters on introduction of Goods and Services Tax regime

Circular: List of Reduced Tax Liabilities under GST regime in comparison to present combined Indirect Tax rates

Circular: Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply

Circular: Clarification regarding applicability of section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, relating to zero rated supply for the purpose of Compensation Cess on exports – Regarding.

Circular: Clarification on Inter-state movement of various modes of conveyance, carrying goods or passengers or for repairs and maintenance- regarding

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: Addition u/s 23(1)(a) - deemed rent - once the property is let out and at any point of time this remained vacant during the same cannot be brought to tax under the head House properties income.

News: Haryana constitutes screening committee on anti-profiteering

Highlight: Valuation of imported goods - it is necessary to re-examine the matter of both license agreement as well as supply contract simultaneously, to see if the enhanced royalty was in the guise of adjustment of the price of components.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version