Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Haryana Vanaspati & General Mill Versus The State of Haryana And Another

Interest on refund of Tax demand – Interest to be granted from date of deposit or from the date of assessment order – Petitioner filed appeal before Appellate Authority claiming interest on refund of tax as demanded, appellate authority merely directed assessing authority to pay interest amount – Petitioner challenged order before Tribunal – Whether petitioner is entitled to interest from dates on which petitioner paid amounts to respondents as condition precedent to maintainability of appeal – .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t which is involved in case – Therefore interest is payable from date of deposit – Impugned order modified by directing respondents to pay interest on amounts deposited from dates on which deposits were made till payment – Petition disposed of –Decided in favour of Petitioner. - CWP No. 16213-2014 - Dated:- 7-8-2015 - S. J. Vazifdar, ACJ And G. S. Sandhawalia, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Sandeep Goyal, Adv For the Respondent : Ms Mamta Singla Talwar, Deputy Adv. General, Haryana ORDER S. J. Vazif .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the HGST Act) and under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 raising a tax demand of ₹ 14,17,071/- on the ground that the goods which had been purchased from within the State of Haryana had been sold on a consignment basis and stock transfer basis. A demand for interest was also raised. Penal action under Section 47 was directed to be taken separately. Under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, a demand of only ₹ 44/- wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ribunal set aside the order and remanded the matter to the assessment authority for assessment following the decision of this Court in the case of State of Haryana and another Vs M/s Ambika Oil & Soap Industries, Rohtak, 103 STC 190. 3. The Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority accordingly passed a fresh order dated 28.05.2009 holding that the petitioner was entitled to a refund of ₹ 11,47,390/-. This amount was paid in December, 2009, but without interest as demanded by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

14/- was also allowed. The same was, however, not paid as the matter was referred to the Excise and Taxation Commissioner for approval. 4. The petitioner filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority claiming interest for the earlier period as well. The first Appellate Authority, however, merely directed the assessing authority to pay interest of ₹ 80,314/- within 30 days from the receipt of its order dated 23.10.2012. The petitioner challenged this order before the Tribunal. It mus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2009 in view of Rule 35(1)(a). The Tribunal held that the petitioner was entitled to interest on the delayed payment of refund with effect from 28.05.2009 till the date of refund i.e. 04.01.2010. The Tribunal relied upon the judgement of this Court in the case of M/s Khem Ram Devi Sahai Vs State of Haryana, [2004] 23 PHT 330 (P&H). 5. The question, therefore, is whether the petitioner is entitled to interest from the dates on which the petitioner paid the amounts to the respondents as a cond .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing unpaid at one per cent per month from the date commencing with the date following the last date for the payment of tax, for a period of one month and at one and a half per cent per month thereafter during the period he continues to make default in the payment: Provided that where the amount of tax not paid as required under sub-section (2A) or subsection (3) does not exceed five hundred rupees, the interest payable thereon shall not exceed the amount of tax not so paid:Provided further that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessed and the penalty and interest, if any, recoverable from the person has been paid. 43. Refund (1) The assessing authority or a person appointed to assist the Commissioner under sub-section (1) of section 3, as the case may be shall, in the prescribed manner, refund to a dealer or to any other person the amount of tax or penalty or interest paid by him in excess of the amount due from him under this Act, either by a refund voucher, or at the option of the dealer by adjustment of the amoun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under this Act is not so refunded to him within the period as may be prescribed, the dealer shall be entitled to interest at such rates and on such terms and conditions as may be prescribed." 7. Rules 35 1(a) and (b) and 38 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975 in so far as they are relevant read as under:- "35 1(a) While framing the assessment of a dealer, the assessing authority shall, after such scrutiny of its record and after making such enquiries as it considers necessary .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the order of any appellate or revisional authority or any court and the same is not the subject-matter of any further proceedings, the dealer or such other person shall make an application to the assessing authority concerned alongwith the original order or the copy thereof duly attested by the dealer, which constitutes the basis for refund, the assessing authority shall order the refund of excess amount in the manner specified in clause (a) within ninety days of the receipt of such application .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f refund, the payment of which was delayed, the period of delay for which such interest is payable and the amount of interest payable by the State Government, and shall communicate the same to the dealer to whom the interest is payable and also to the Commissioner stating briefly the reasons for the delay in allowing the refund. (2) Where an order for the payment of interest on delayed refunds under sub-rule (1) has been made, the sanctioning authority shall issue to the dealer interest payment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is important to note that Section 39 (5) of the HGST Act requires an assessee to pay the amount of the tax assessed and the penalty or interest, if any, recoverable in order to have an appeal under sub section (1) entertained. Sub section (5) of Section 39 provides that no appeal shall be entertained unless the appellate authority is satisfied that the amount of tax and the penalty or interest, if any, recoverable from the person has been paid. Thus, sub section (5) does not merely require the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Appellate Authority. Absent any statutory bar, there is no justification for denying a successful assessee interest upon the amount(s) to be refunded for the period during which the revenue had the benefit thereof. The revenue suffers no loss thereby for it has enjoyed the benefit of the money during this period. It has enjoyed the benefit of the money that it was never entitled to. 9. In equity, the petitioner's claim is established. The question is whether the claim is barred by any provis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t in view of sub section (2) of Section 43. The submission is not well founded. Section 43(2) entitles an assessee to interest in certain circumstances. Sub section (1) of Section 43 merely requires the assessing authority to refund in the prescribed manner the person concerned the amount of penalty, tax or interest paid by him in excess of the amount due from him under the HGST Act either by a refund voucher or at the option of the assessee, by adjustment. There is no implied, much less an expr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

35 entitles the assessee to interest at the rate specified in Section 25(5) of the HGST Act, where there is a failure to refund any amount ordered by the Appellate or Revisional Authority within ninety days of the receipt of an application by the assessee for the same. The revenue is not bound to wait for an application before refunding amounts adjudicated by the Appellate or the Revisional Authority to be due from it to any person. The revenue is bound to refund the amount forthwith subject of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ard and in fact a minimal guarantee to the assessee who has been kept out of his money despite an order of the Appellate or Revisional Authority and the expiry of a period of ninety days from the date of an application by the assessee for refund in accordance with the order of the Appellate or Revisional Authority. Neither Section 43, nor Rule 35(1)(b) bars the payment of interest for the period prior thereto. 12. We are invited to exercise our extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n 11.06.1999 with the direction that the amount paid by the petitioner to the department be refunded immediately. After waiting for four months, the petitioner therein submitted an application to the assessing authority for refund of the amount. The amount was, however, not refunded. Following a judgement dated 05.09.1994 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in CWP-2372-1994 titled as Sagar Motor Company Vs State of Haryana and another, the Division Bench directed the respondents to refund .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

th interest. The Division Bench by an order and judgement dated 05.09.1994 held:- "Inspite of notice and sufficient time allowed to the respondents, they have not filed any reply. Admittedly, the appeal has been allowed and the petitioner has become entitled to the refund of the amount deposited by it. Consequently, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to refund the amount of penalty deposited by the petitioner alongwith interest at the rate of 12% per annum f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

el for the parties, we are satisfied that the petitioner deserves to succeed in its claim for interest. In the case of Saurabh Kumar & Bros. [2002] 127 STC 556; (2001) 18 PHT 336, this Court had noticed rule 35 of the Rules (sic) and held that if the refund is not issued with the assessment order, the department is liable to pay interest. Thus, it has been correctly claimed that the department was liable to issue refund on March 26, 2003. It has also been correctly pointed out that the subse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was allowed on November 26, 1997. However, on acceptance of appeal, the amount deposited was not refunded. Since the representations of the petitioner yielded no result, the petitioner approached the High Court. The department had taken the stand that the appellate authority while cancelling the penalty on November 26, 1997 had remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Assessing Officer vide his order dated June 25, 2001, had again imposed the penalty of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessment order under which he was entitled to the refund. The petitioner did not claim interest from the date of the deposit. The Division Bench granted interest for the period claimed, but did not hold that interest is not payable from the date of the deposit. 16. M/s Khem Ram Devi Sahai Vs State of Haryana's judgement followed a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Saurabh Kumar & Bros. Vs State of Punjab and others, [2002] 127 STC 556 (P&H). In Saurabh Kumar & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he HGST Act which is involved in the case before us. Section 12(3) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, is, however, similar to Section 25(2) of the HGST Act and reads as under:- "12(3) Where any amount required to be refunded by the assessing authority to any person by virtue of an order issued under this Act is not refunded to him within ninety days of the date of the order, the dealer shall be entitled to get simple interest on such amount at the rate of one percentum per month fro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rior to the date of the order granting the refund. The Division Bench did not hold that interest from the date of the deposit is not payable. 17. We are, therefore, bound by the aforesaid judgements of this Court in M/s Sonu Rice Mills, Ellanabad, Sirsa Vs State of Haryana and others and Sagar Motor Company Vs State of Haryana and another. Interest is payable from the date of the deposit. 18. In this view of the matter, it is not necessary to consider Mr. Goyal's submission based on Rule 38 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version