Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1 (3) , Bangalore Versus Smt. Lakshmi Aruna

Treatment of cash seized in the course of search - assessment u/s 153A - Held that:- Unexplained income arising out of ₹ 35,00,000 having been brought to tax in the hands of the assessee's husband, Sri G. Janardhan Reddy, the addition in the hands of the assessee is the case on hand is to be deleted as the same income cannot be taxed twice. In coming to this finding, we are bolstered in our view by the Affidavit sworn to by Sri G. Janardhan Reddy to confirm that the same addition is accept .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessment Year 2008-09. The assessee has also preferred Cross Objections (C.O.) in the matter. 2. The facts of the case, briefly, are as under :- 2.1 The assessee filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2008-09 on 30.9.2008 declaring income of ₹ 19,62,85,960. Pursuant to search action under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') being conducted in this group on 26.10.2007, proceedings were initiated under Section 153A of the Act and in response thereto, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ds the unexplained cash seized in the course of search. The case was taken up for scrutiny and the assessment was concluded under Section 143(3) rws 153A of the Act vide order dt.31.12.2009, wherein the income of the assessee was determined at ₹ 20,16,64,880. 2.2 Aggrieved by the order of assessment for Assessment Year 2008-09 dt.31.12.2009, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT (Appeals), Mysore. The learned CIT (Appeals) disposed of the matter vide order dt.14.12.2012 allowing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

which is enough time which shows that the declaration given after 2 months of date of search is well thought of one. The new argument of the appellant after substantial time lapse appears to be clearly an afterthought for the reasons mentioned by the A.O. 5.2 Another interesting feature is that the amount of ₹ 35,000 is already admitted by the appellant in her return. Subsequently during the course of assessment proceedings, it was requested to exclude that income on the reasoning that it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the fact that Sri G. Janardhan Reddy is the key person I find it more appropriate to tax this excess cash found in the hands of the appellant s husband. Accordingly I agree with the argument of the appellant that same income cannot be taxed twice and for these reasons direct the Assessing Officer to delete the addition in the hands of the appellant. 3.1 Aggrieved by the order of the CIT (Appeals), Mysore dt.14.12.2012 for Assessment Year 2008-09, Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal raising .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

delete the addition of ₹ 35,00,000 made on account of unaccounted cash found and seized in the course of search on 26.10.2007. According to the ld. A.R., in the course of search on 26.10.2007 cash of ₹ 36,16,500 was found. On the day of search the assessee stated that the said cash belonged to Obulapuram Mining Company and since the books of account of this firm was incomplete and no proper explanation in respect of the cash was forth coming, an amount of ₹ 35,00,000 was seize .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e course of assessment proceedings it was pointed out to the Assessing Officer that the investment of ₹ 90,60,000 in the purchase of property on 4.2.2006 had already been admitted by the assessee and taxed in the assessee's hands in the Assessment Year 2006-07 in the order of assessment passed pursuant to notice under Section 153A and therefore the additional income offered to this extent be deleted. The Assessing Officer on verification of the relevant records of assessment found and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(Appeals) deleted this amount of ₹ 35,00,000 pertaining to excess cash in the assessee's hands as he found that the same seized cash of ₹ 35 lakhs was already brought to tax in the hands of the assessee's husband Sri G. Janardhan Reddy s hands, in view of the fact that the same income cannot be taxed twice. According to the learned Authorised Representative for the assessee, the order of the learned CIT (Appeals), deleting the amount of seized cash of ₹ 35 lakhs in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

record. The sole issue for consideration before us, in Revenue s appeal, is regarding the treatment of cash of ₹ 35 lakhs, seized in the course of search on 26.10.2007, in the case on hand. Admittedly, this amount was disclosed by the assessee in the income returned pursuant to the search. The assessee, inter alia, put forth the explanation before the Assessing Officer and the learned CIT (Appeals) that the very same amount of income of ₹ 35 lakhs on account of cash seized on the dat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ned order of the learned CIT (Appeals), at para 5.3 thereof, that the learned CIT (Appeals) while deleting the addition of ₹ 35 lakhs on account of seized cash in the assessee's hands had mentioned confirming the same addition in the case of the assessee's husband Sri G. Janardhan Reddy for Assessment Year 2008-09 holding that :- 5.3 However considering the fact that Sri g. Janardhan Reddy is the key person, I find it more appropriate to tax this excess cash found in the hands of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

's hands and he therefore deleted the same addition in the case on hand. In confirmation of the averments of the learned Authorised Representative for the assessee that the assessee's husband Sri G. Janardhan Reddy has accepted the order of the learned CIT (Appeals) to tax the unexplained seized cash of ₹ 35 lakhs in his hands, and has filed an Affidavit dt.8.7.2015 sworn to by Sri G. Janardhan Reddy, the relevant portion of which reads as under :- AFFIDAVIT Sri G. Janardhana Reddy .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version