Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 215 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (9) TMI 215 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2015 (39) S.T.R. 635 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Demand of service tax - Receipt of royalty - Held that:- both the lower authorities have erred in coming to a conclusion that appellant is liable to pay the service tax. if amount which is paid for as royalty and remains undisputed, the said amount of royalty cannot be covered under the Intellectual Property Service which came into tax net from 10.9.2004. It is seen from the records that the lower authorities have sought t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

10.9.2004. If that be so, service tax liability would not arise on the amount received by the appellant during the period 20.4.2004 to 10.9.2004. - impugned order is unsustainable and liable to be set aside - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. ST/252/2009-Mum - Dated:- 15-4-2015 - Mr. M. V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) And Hon ble Mr. P. S. Pruthi, Member (Technical),JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Mayur Shroff, Advocate For the Respondent Shri D. Nagvenkar, Additional Commissioner (A.R) O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat as per the terms and conditions of the above mentioned agreement, M/s. Dhariwal Industries Ltd. is required to pay royalty to the appellant at a fixed rate of 3% of Net sales on the basis of audited annual reports. On scrutiny of the audited Balance Sheet for the year ending 31.3.2005, it was noticed that the appellant had issued two invoices for the receipt of the royalty for the period 1.4.2004 to 10.9.2004 and did not discharge the service tax liability. Show cause notice was issued which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

had received royalty from M/s. Dhariwal Industries Ltd. It is his submissions that the question involved in this case is whether the service tax liability would be required to be discharged for the period 1.4.2004 to 10.9.2004 under the category of Intellectual Property Services . He would submit that the said services were brought into service tax from 10.9.2004. He would submit that both the lower authorities have incorrectly appreciated the facts, as the service tax liability arises on the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Royalty which has been paid for the period in question i.e. 1.4.2004 to 10.9.2004 though settled in 2004-2005 and hence only tax net. 4. Ld. A.R. on the other hand, would draw our attention to the Notification No. 18/2004-S.T. and submit that the said notification specifically states service tax liability would not arise on the appellant to that portion of the value of taxable service which is received by the service provider from the customer prior to 10th day of September 2004. He would the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y of Intellectual Property Services or otherwise. It is undisputed that the amount which has been received by the appellant during material period in question was as royalty for the use of the brand which is registered in the name of the appellant assessee. 7. We peruse the agreement entered by the appellant with M/s. Dhariwal Industries Ltd. The said agreement assigned brand/trade name M/s. Dhariwal Industries Ltd. for a period of 4 years i.e. 20.4.2004 to 31.3.2008, specific articles of the sa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ales 1.4.2006 to 31.3.2007 3% of Net Sales 1.4.2007 to 31.3.2008 3% of Net Sales The Net Sales shall include all indigenous Sales, Exports Sales (including Sales to RMD (HUF)). (3) DIL shall render to RMD (HUF) the audited annual reports following the close of each Financial Year, on the basis of which royalties are payable under this agreement. DIL shall pay to RMD (HUF) the amount of Royalty payable within 3 months from audited annual reports. It can be noticed from the above reproduced articl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version