Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, Ahmedabad Circle-1, Ahmedabad Versus M/s. Arvind Ltd and Vica-Versa

Disallowance of depreciation - CIT(A) allowed the claim - Held that:- It is to be seen that the CIT(A) has only restored the issue back to the Assessing Officer for factual verification as to whether the assesssee has already considered the very depreciation in its computation not as so as to avoid double disallowance. The assessee places before us the Assessing Officer’s consequential order dated to be 22/02/2010 wrongly mentioned expressly stating CIT(A)’s order under challenge. The impugned d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vely. The CIT(A) accepts assessee’s arguments and holds that the same is directly linked to its business in question as per the tribunal’s order in case of Aarti Industries [2005 (2) TMI 428 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C]. The Revenue fails to rebut these findings of fact and law by quoting cogent material or case law to the contrary. We observe in these facts that these amounts lead to reduction in purchase price of the corresponding material purchased for the purpose of business only. The CIT(A)’s findin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee’s stand throughout is that this interest sum of ₹ 20,82,239/- has arisen from late payments of export proceeds only from overseas export customers. Even the CIT(A) observed that the impugned interest can be treated to have been derived from industrial undertaking since the same is received from debtors is part of profits, but not derived from exports. We disagree with this reasoning as the interest has been derived from export proceedings of the eligible business unit only. We re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Shri G. D. Agrawal and Shri S. S. Godara, JJ. For The Revenue : Shri R.I, Patel CIT-DR with Dinesh Singh, Sr. D.R. For The Assessee : Shri P.M. Mehta with G.M., Thakor, A.R. ORDER PER : S. S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- These cross appeals filed by the Revenue and assessee for A.Y. 2001-02, arise from order of the CIT(A)-VI, Ahmedabad dated 17-01-2011 in appeal no. CIT(A)-VI/DCIT. CIR.1/236/07-08, in proceedings under section 143(3) r. W.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short the Act . 2. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

records that while arriving at the A.I., the depreciation as per companies act as debited in the P&L a/c. was added to the profit of ₹ 1,40,13,29,356/- instead of actual figure of Rs, 7,48,75,43,300/-. Therefore, an amount of ₹ 8,62,13,944/- remains to be added. Hence, the AR of the assessee was asked for to explain. In response to the above, the assessee has submitted reply as under: - With regards to the same, it may be pointed out that Arvind International, a division of Arvin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e provisions of section 10(B). Vide the statement of reasons furnished to the assessee you have stated that depreciation to the tune of ₹ 8,62,13,944/- was not added back while computing the total income of the assessee for the year under consideration. Further you have quoted section 10(B)(bj, where in it is stated that where the assessee is allowed deduction under the said section, no deduction of depreciation is allowable but shall be deemed to have been allowed. The assessee here in st .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eciation for the unit of Arvind International. Further, while arriving at the figure of 11,22,72,452/- as deduction u/s 10(B), depreciation of ₹ 8,62,13,944/- was already deducted from the profit of the entity. Therefore, while adding back the depreciation to compute the business income of the assessee as a whole, there was no further need to add back the depreciation on account of such unit. It may be further brought to your notice that while computing the income of the assessee under the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t may be also brought to your notice that the assessee had adopted the same method to compute the total income even for the earlier years. The assessee to further substantiate its stand, attaches a copy of the computation of income for A.Y. 2000-01 for your kind perusal. In view of the above, it is clear that the assessee has rightly added back the amount of depreciation to the tune of ₹ 1,40,13,29,356/- and therefore, in the opinion of the assessee, there is no under assessment of income .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

holds no base and therefore an addition of ₹ 8,62,13,944/- is made to the total income of the assessee. 3.2 The appellant has submitted in its written submission which is as under: The assessing officer has observed that the depreciation as per the Profit & Loss Account was ₹ 148,75,43,300/-as against which in the computation the appellant had added back the amount of ₹ 140,13,29,356/-and hence according to him the amount of difference of ₹ 8,62,13,944/- remained to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ind International, a division of Arvind Mills Ltd. was a 100% Export Oriented Unit, entitled to deduction u/s. 10B of the Act. During the year under consideration, the EOU was debonded w.e.f. 3.1.2001 and the assessee decided not to avail such deduction from the said date. The assessee further stated that the assessee earned after depreciation total income of ₹ 11,33,47,660 from EOU but a deduction to the tune of ₹ 11,22,72,452 was claimed as per sec. JOB of the Act. It was also subm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onsidered only for the period for 3.1.2001 to 31.3.2001 i.e. the period after the renunciation of right to claim deduction u/s. 10B. The same is also highlighted in the return of income filed by the assessee. Hence, the total income as offered to tax by the assessee has been rightly computed taking into consideration all the provisions applicable to the assessee and therefore, there is no short-levy of tax. 3.3 I have considered the facts of the case, assessment order and appellant s submission. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er section 10 B, no separate addition in general computation of income was made. It is a matter of verification. I have gone through the computation of 10 B and I find that the said book depreciation is considered there. In any case, assessing officer is directed to verify from the computation of 10 B deductions and if the difference in book depreciation is considered in said computation then he will not make further addition in normal business computation. If the same is not considered in 10 B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

expressly stating CIT(A) s order under challenge. The impugned disallowance on account of depreciation of ₹ 8,62,13,944/- stands deleted in the said order. The Revenue s grievance is rendered infructous. Its corresponding ground accordingly fails. 5. The Revenue s 2nd ground of Rs. ,8,24,522/- on account of other income is dealt in the CIT(A) findings as follows 4. The ground No.3 is against addition of ₹ 8, 24,522/- on account of the income. 4.1 The A.O. has stated in the assessmen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sion of Arv/ nd Mills Ltd. earmarked as a 100% EOU, earned a total income classified under other income to the tune of ₹ 8,24,522/- comprising of material purchase discount, insurance claim received and other miscellaneous income. It may be noted that though all such income as referred to hereinabove, classified under other income are essentially linked to the division s main business. Classifying the same under other income has been done merely to separate these items from sales. Therefor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rt of articles. In view of the same, the arguments of the assessee were found to be untenable and therefore, the income pertaining to insurance claim and other miscellaneous income is sought to be deducted while computing the deduction available u/s 10(B). Therefore, the claim of the assessee for deduct/on u/s 10B stands reduced to that effect. 4.2 The appellant has submitted in its written submission which is as under: The A.O. has stated that the other income includes insurance claim and purch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iscount, insurance claim. This discount, insurance claims goes to reduce the cost and accordingly it increases the business profit of the under taking. Thus if results into reduction of cost and hence it is part of the business income of the under faking. Hence it is eligible for deduction or exemption as the case may be. This may be appreciated in view of the decision of the ITAT, Ahmedabad in the case of Aarti Industries 95 TTJ 15. 4.3 I have considered the facts of the case, assessment order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se discount and insurance claims are directly linked to the business of the undertaking. These reduce the cost of purchases and therefore part of business income. Respectfully following the decision of jurisdictional ITAT referred by the appellant, assessing officer is directing to allow deduction under section 10B of IT act on these incomes. 6. Rival contentions heard. Record perused. There is no dispute that this sum of ₹ 8,24,522/- has arisen from insurance claim of exported goods, purc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or the purpose of business only. The CIT(A) s findings under challenge are affirmed. Revenue s appeal ITA 816/Ahd/2011 is dismissed. 7. This leaves us with the assessee s appeal ITA 1022/Ahd/2011 challenging validity of the reopening in question and also claiming sec. 10B deduction on interest of ₹ 20,82,239/- received on late recoveries from customers. Both the lower authorities hold that above stated interest as not to have arisen from the eligible business. The assessee does not press i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rest was set-off against the interest expenditure of the unit and the net interest expenditure was shown in the Profit & Loss o/c of the division. As the assessee initially failed to submit the actual details of the interest earned, it was proposed to apportion the total interest earned by the assessee, Arvind Mills to its division Arvind International in the ratio of their respective turnover. Hence, the AR of the assessee was asked for to explain. In response to the above, the assessee has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ace of the same, the assessee s contention that the interest income has arisen out of such transactions is found to be invalid. Further, keeping in mind the provisions of section 10(B), the income from interest so earned should be separated while computing the net gains from such export business. Therefore, the interest earned by the assessee amounting to ₹ 20,82,239/- is to be deducted from the amount sought to be claimed by the assessee as deduction u/s 10(B) and hence, the deduction ava .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iture/ income of the articles and was not to be excluded. In any case, the net amount of interest income and expenditure was expenditure of ₹ 131.36 lakh. Hence also there was no justification for not considering this income for the purpose of section 10(B). The A.O. has stated that it is not considered income and not the profit of the undertaking. Hence he says that the claim is not valid. In this connection it is submitted that as stated before the A.O. and as accepted by him the net fig .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ale proceedings of the undertaking and hence it should not be excluded from the eligible profit. This view is supported by various decisions as under: i) Gujarat High Court in the case of Nirma Industries Ltd. 283 ITR 402. ii) Madras High Court decision in the case of Indo Matsushita Carbon Co. Ltd. 286 ITR 201. Having regard to the above specific decisions, the impugned amount of interest forms part of the eligible profit/ eligible income of the undertaking and it cannot be excluded. 5.3 I have .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

80 HHC or 10 B. The interest from customers can be treated as derived from industrial undertaking since interest received from debtors is part of profit of the undertaking. However interest received from customers is not derived from the business of exports. The immediate source of this income is delayed payments from customers and not exports of goods or services. Considering the apex court decision in the case of sterling foods Ltd, interest will not qualify for deduction under section 10 B. A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version