New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 385 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (9) TMI 385 - ITAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Disallowance of outstanding labour charges to various contractors - Held that:- The assessee files a chart showing identical unpaid labour charges paid/accepted in assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13; respectively.

We reiterate that these random cases duly confirm to have made available their services at respective BSNL offices. There is no dispute raised about their identity since identity cards form part of the case file. There are many othe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee has been able to prove its claim in question of the outstanding labour charges of ₹ 29,37,728/- to have been incurred in carrying out his contractual assignments. The Revenue’s arguments on mere assumptions and presumptions accordingly stand rejected. The impugned disallowance is deleted. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No. 590/Ahd/2011 - Dated:- 26-8-2015 - Shri G. D. Agrawal and Shri S. S. Godara, JJ. For The Assessee: Shri Tej Shah, A.R. For The Revenue : Shri Dinesh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eipts in relevant previous year are of ₹ 1,29,53,407/- resulting in gross and net profit of ₹ 16,58,728/- and ₹ 6,83,015/-, @ 12.80% and 5.27%; respectively. He claimed labour charges of ₹ 73,95,983/- comprising of unpaid outstanding seems of ₹ 33,45,640/- relatable to February & March, 2007. As per Assessing Officer, this would enhance the corresponding expenses of the said months to be more than 50%. The assessee submitted a list of the payees comprising of 20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stations like Bhavnagar, Surat, Buj, & Surendranagar and employed this labour in the said activities. The Assessing Officer observed in assessment order dated 22/12/2009 that no evidence was forthcoming proving this expenditure to have wholly and exclusively incurred for the purpose of the business. He cited lack of details qua the payees services rendered along with muster rolls and wages etc. He opined that these labour charges were in the nature of accommodation entry for reducing taxabl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

indings as follows:- On 16.12.2010 a written submission was received in dak in which copies of confirmations with respect to some labourers were filed in this office. Xerox copies of confirmations were given of persons who figured nowhere in the list of the liabilities outstanding. Or the list of outstanding liability showed lesser amounts. On perusal of the copies of confirmations the AO is directed to delete the following amounts as per remarks given in the Amount with remarks column in the li .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re in the list of the AO hence not considered. 7 Mahendra Parmar-Rs. 48,628 In the list of AO the outstanding amount is shown at Sr.no. 128 at ₹ 12,963 and at Sr. No. 162 at ₹ 16,445 only. ₹ 12,963 + ₹ 16,445 is directed to be deleted. 8 Rajeshbhai Rathod-Rs. 49,065 In the list of AO the outstanding amount is shown at Sr.no. 171 at ₹ 15,789 only. ₹ 15,789 is directed to be deleted. 9 Amitbhai Kadiya ₹ 49,908 is directed to be deleted 10 Ketan Ishwarlal K .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

idered 15 Arvindbhai Dabhi ₹ 49,759 is directed to be deleted 16 Hasrnukhbhai Gajera This name is not there in the list of the AO hence not considered 17 Brijmohan Singh ₹ 48.3T2 is directed to be deleted. 18 Maheshbhai Chauhan Shown outstanding in the list only for ₹ 11,569 ₹ 11,569 is directed to be deleted. 19 Manoj Pujari - ₹ 37,629 Shown outstanding in the list in the assessment order for ₹ 19,843 at S.no14 ₹ 19,843 is directed to be deleted. 20 Moh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t considered. 7. After going through rival submissions the AO out of addition made of ₹ 33,45,640 is directed to delete ₹ 4,07,912 as per narration in the column 'Amount with Remarks' given in the table above based on the confirmations furnished by the appellant. However the balance addition of ₹ 29,37,728 (Rs.33,45,640 - R.s.4,07,912) is upheld because despite opportunities given by the AO and this office the observations of the AO were not contradicted by the appellan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty. But this was not discharged, therefore the addition is upheld of ₹ 29,37,728. 5. We have heard both the parties and perused the case file. The assessee files a chart showing identical unpaid labour charges of ₹ 25,04,780/-, ₹ 24,44,736/-, ₹ 8,95,620/-, ₹ 13,61,236/- and ₹ 79,034/- paid/accepted in assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13; respectively. Its paper book page 16 contains confirmation of one of the payee Shri Sanjay Barot in support of the gross out .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version