Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Saj Flight Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer (OSD) , Company Ci rcle-VI (1) , Chennai

2015 (9) TMI 492 - ITAT CHENNAI

Disallowance of expenses in agricultural activity - CIT (Appeals) ought to have seen that assessee is running farm tourism - Held that:- No good reason to interfere with the findings of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in sustaining the disallowance of agricultural expenses . Thus, we affirm the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on this issue and reject the grounds raised by the assessee for both the assessment years. - Decided against assessee.

Disallowance of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee.

Dispute relating to grant of interest under section 244A - whether is to be decided by jurisdictional Commissioner or the Chief Commissioner? - Held that:- In view of the decision of Tata Communications Ltd. Vs. ACIT [2014 (1) TMI 1277 - ITAT MUMBAI ] the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is a valid one warranting adjudication by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Since the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has not gone into merits and held that matter is not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uch expenses holding that certain payments were made for publicity and such expenses are to the extent of ₹ 1,55,000/- and confirmed expenses of ₹ 55,000/-. We do not see any infirmity in the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in partly allowing the expenses incurred for publicity. Thus, we affirm the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - Decided against assessee. - I.T.A.Nos.1701 & 1719/Mds/2012 - Dated:- 26-8-2015 - SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI AND SHRI CHALLA .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

common issue in both these appeals is that Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ought to have seen that assessee is running farm tourism and erred in summarily confirming the disallowance of expenses in agricultural activity. 3. Brief facts are that assessee company is engaged in the business of flight catering and allied professional services filed its return of income on 28.11.2003 and 01.11.2004 declaring income of ₹ 18,63,160/- and ₹ 26,20,650/- for the assessment years 2003-04 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vating vegetables and such vegetables are utilized in the restaurants maintained by the assessee and therefore assessee cannot make income out of itself. Alternatively, the Assessing Officer held that loss from agricultural activity cannot be allowed as deduction in view of the provisions of section 14A of the Act. The Assessing Officer observed that loss from agriculture being expenditure over income is nothing but an expenditure incurred which is earning an income that is exempted from tax. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as to disallow the same under section 14A of the Act. He further submits that agricultural income was considered for tax purposes and therefore it cannot be held that such income is exempt so as to attract provisions of section 14A of the Act. 5. Departmental Representative vehemently submits that what was shown by the assessee is agricultural income only and therefore agricultural expenses debited to profit and loss account over and above the income cannot be allowed as deduction. 6. Heard both .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he appellant as per the direction of Hon ble ITAT to substantiate the claim of ₹ 8,67,880/- agricultural income and the corresponding debit of expenditure relating to agriculture of ₹ 13,66,265/-. After evaluating the details filed the Assessing Officer observed the following discrepancies with regard to the claims: i) As against the claim that vegetables are cultivated in 1 acre out of 11 acre of land in Vagaman Hideout during the hearing, the appellant in the written submission dat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e is required and tea plantation yields for a period of 10 to 15 years. iii. The appellant has not maintained or produced books of account for the income/expenditure. Though huge sums ought to have gone through bank transactions, the appellant failed to show by way of bank transactions. iv. The appellant s claim of expenditure for cultivation of vegetables in 2 acres ₹ 13,66,265/- is too far high and even if expenditure on tea plantation is taken into account the said expenditure is on the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orm of vegetable, honey, dairy, farm and poultry is given and all income are from the guests who came to the resort. He argued that the statement of account so submitted are attested by the auditor. On careful consideration I find that the appellant has not countered the points made by the AO in the assessment order for drawing adverse inference. It is a settled law that the onus is on the appellant to furnish verifiable evidence to prove that income earned is from agriculture [CIT vs R. Venkata .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the appellant has submitted that the addition of agricultural income of ₹ 8,67,880/- made by the AO amounted to duplication of income as the total income as per return ₹ 18,63,160/- includes ₹ 8,67,880/-. The Assessing Officer is directed to verify the contention of the appellant and if found to be true reduce the amount of ₹ 8,67,880/-while giving effect to this order. These grounds of appeal are partly allowed. 7. On going through the order of the Commissioner of Incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e disallowance of depreciation claimed on temporary structures. The Assessing Officer while completing the assessment restricted depreciation on temporary structures to 5% considering the structure as permanent one. The Assessing Officer further observed that assessee has not established whether temporary construction has been taken place and if taken place under in which month and when it was demolished as it was the contention of the assessee that temporary structure was demolished later in vi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

whether the structures are temporary and what kind of construction was erected and when it was demolished, therefore in the absence of any such details the Assessing Officer appears to be justified in restricting the claim of depreciation to 5%.Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee on this issue are dismissed. 10. The last issue in the grounds of appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2003-04 is that Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in holding that matter relating to interes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ies, we find that Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Tata Communications Ltd. Vs. ACIT in ITA No.8592/Mum/2010 dated 24.07.2013 considering a similar issue held that assessee had preferred a valid appeal warranting adjudication. While holding so, the Tribunal observed as under:- We have heard the parties, and perused the material on record. The issue arising for determination in the instant case is a pure legal issue, i.e., whether the assessee could, de horsits liability to tax, contes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nese Ore Co. Ltd. vs. CIT[1986] 160 ITR 961 (SC), wherein the issue involved was the denial to liability and/or charge of interest u/s.215 at a lesser amount, stands duly considered and distinguished by the hon ble high court. It is in this context that its stands explained that clause (c) of section 246 is in two parts, so that the assessee s appeal would fall in the second part, i.e., disputing the tax as determined vide the assessment order. In view of our finding aforesaid, i.e., of the issu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he said interest, and whose order contains no reference to any reason for the non-grant of the mandatory interest u/s.244A; the law clearly prescribing the same for being granted along with the refund. Under the circumstances, we only consider it fit and proper to, setting aside the impugned order, restore the matter back to the file of the A.O. to allow the assessee an opportunity to plead its case with reference to grant of interest u/s.244A; we having not examined the issue on merits at all, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in accordance with law, after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. 13. The second issue in the appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2004-05 is that Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of advertisement & publicity expenses and office expenses. The Assessing Officer while completing the assessment disallowed ₹ 2,14,700/- under the head advertisement & publicity and also office expenses of ₹ 55,000/- stating that some of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version