TMI BlogCost Audit and Assurance Standard on Overall Objectives of the Independent Cost Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Standards on AuditingX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ments establishing the general responsibilities of the independent auditor applicable in all audits, including the obligation to comply with the CAASs. The independent auditor is referred to as the Cost auditor hereafter. Objectives 2. The objective of issuing this Standard is to lay down the principles governing the Audit of Cost Statements. The objective of an audit of Cost Statements is to enable the auditor to express an opinion whether the Cost Statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable Cost reporting framework and give a true and fair view of the Cost of a product, activity or service. In the case of a Cost Audit under the Cost Audit Report Rules in India, the objective is to express an opinion on whether the Cost Statements subject to audit represent a true and fair view of the Cost of production, cost of sales and margin of products covered by the Cost Audit. It is the responsibility of the management and where required of the governing body e.g. Board of Directors to maintain the cost records, prepare the cost statements and the abridged Cost Statement and other information contained in the Annexure to the Cost ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed to refer to the person or persons conducting the audit, usually the engagement partner or other members of the engagement team, or, as applicable the firm. Auditor includes Cost Auditor 4.4 Audit Risk: Audit risk is the risk that the cost auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion on the cost statements that are materially misstated. Audit risk is a function of the risk of material misstatement and detection risk. The risk of material misstatement has two components viz. Inherent Risk and Control risk. a. Inherent risk: The susceptibility of an assertion about the measurement, assignment or disclosure of cost to a misstatement that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements, before consideration of any related controls. b. Control risk: The risk that a misstatement that could occur in an assertion about the measurement, assignment or disclosure of cost and that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements, will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis by the entity's internal, operational and management control. c. Detection risk: The risk that the procedur ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1) of section 2 of The Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959) and who holds a valid certificate of practice under subsection (1) of section 6 and who is deemed to be in practice under subsection (2) of section 2 of that Act and includes a firm of cost accountants. 4.10 Engagement Partner: Engagement partner means the partner or other person in the firm who is a member of the Institute of Cost Accountants of India and is in full time practice and is responsible for the engagement and its performance, and for the report that is issued on behalf of the firm, and who, where required, has the appropriate authority from a professional, legal or regulatory body. 4.11 Engagement Team: Engagement team means all personnel performing an engagement, including any experts contracted by the firm in connection with that engagement. 4.12 Firm: Firm means a sole practitioner, partnership including LLP or any other entity of professional cost accountants as may be permitted by law and constituted under The Cost and Works Accountants Act Regulations. 4.13 Misstatement: A difference between the amount, classification, presentation or disclosure of a reported cost state ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... onal skepticism recognizing that circumstances may exist that cause the Cost Statements to be materially misstated. (refer 6.3) 5.6 The cost auditor should exercise professional judgment in planning and performing the audit. (refer 6.4) 5.7 The auditor shall obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level and thereby enable the auditor to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the auditor's opinion. (refer 6.4) 5.8 The cost auditor should determine whether the Cost Reporting Framework followed by management in preparing the Cost Statements is acceptable. (refer 6.5) 5.9 The cost auditor shall not be required to perform audit procedures regarding the entity's compliance with laws and regulations governing cost audit in the absence of identified or suspected non-compliance. (refer 6.6) 6. Application Guidance: 6.1 Audit and Ethics (refer 5.1) : The cost auditor should comply with relevant ethical requirements as per Code of Ethics of the Institute of Cost Accountants of India. This code establishes fundamental principles of professional ethics relevant to the auditor when conducting an audit and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nal skepticism : (refer 5.5) An attitude of professional skepticism means the cost auditor makes a critical assessment, with a questioning mind, of the validity of audit evidence obtained and be alert to audit evidence that contradicts or brings into question the reliability of documents and responses to inquiries and other information obtained from management and those charged with governance. An attitude of professionalism is necessary throughout the cost audit process for the auditor to reduce the risk of overlooking unusual circumstances, of over generalizing when drawing conclusions from cost audit observations, and of using faulty assumptions in determining the nature, timing and extent of the cost audit procedures and evaluating the results thereof. When making inquiries and performing other cost audit procedures, the cost auditor is not satisfied with less-than-persuasive audit evidence based on a belief that management and those charged with governance are honest and have integrity. Accordingly, representations from management are not a substitute for obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence to be able to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the cost auditor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 5.6 and 5.7) Entities pursue strategies to achieve their objectives, and depending on the nature of their operations and industry, the regulatory environment in which they operate, and their size and complexity, they face a variety of business risks. Management is responsible for identifying such risks and responding to them. However, not all risks relate to the preparation of the Cost Statements. the auditor is ultimately concerned only with risks that may affect the cost statements. 6.4.1 The cost auditor obtains and evaluates audit evidence to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Cost Statements give a true and fair view or in accordance with the applicable cost reporting framework. The concept of reasonable assurance acknowledges that there is a risk the audit opinion is inappropriate. The risk that the cost auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the Cost Statements are materially misstated is known as audit risk. The cost auditor reduces audit risk by designing and performing audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to be able to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base an audit opinion. Reasonable assurance is obtaine ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ement override of internal control. Such risks may be especially relevant to the cost auditor's consideration of the risk of material misstatement arising from fraud. The auditor's response to the assessed risk of material misstatement at the overall cost statement level includes consideration of the knowledge, skill, and ability of personnel assigned significant engagement responsibilities, including whether to involve experts; the appropriate levels of supervision; 6.4.5 The cost auditor also considers the risk of material misstatement at the cost heads, items of cost and disclosure level because such consideration directly assists in determining the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures at the assertion level. The cost auditor seeks to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence at the cost heads, items of cost, and disclosure level in such a way that enables the auditor, at the completion of the audit, to express opinion on the Cost Statements taken as a whole at an acceptably low level of cost audit risk. Auditors use various approaches to accomplish that objective. The discussion in the following paragraphs provides an explanation of the compone ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent of risk. When the auditor's assessment of the risk of material misstatement includes an expectation of the operating effectiveness of controls, the auditor performs tests of controls to support the risk assessment. The CAAS AND GACAAPs do not ordinarily refer to inherent risk and control risk separately, but rather to a combined assessment of the risk of material misstatement. Although the CAAS AND GACAAPs ordinarily describe a combined assessment of the risk of material misstatement, the auditor may make separate or combined assessments of inherent and control risk depending on preferred audit techniques or methodologies and practical considerations. The assessment of the risk of material misstatement may be expressed in quantitative terms, such as in percentages, or in non-quantitative terms. In any case, the need for the auditor to make appropriate risk assessments is more important than the different approaches by which they may be made. Detection risk is the risk that the cost auditor will not detect a misstatement that exists in an assertion that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements. Detection risk is a function o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... framework including inter-alia: Designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of Cost Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; Selecting and applying appropriate Cost accounting policies; and Making cost estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances. 6.6 Non-compliance (refer 5.9) The cost auditor shall request management to provide written representation that all known instances of non-compliance or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations governing Cost Accounting, Cost Records and Cost Audit have been disclosed to the cost auditor. The representations provide necessary audit evidence about management knowledge of identified or suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations whose effects may have a material effect on the cost statement however, written representation do not provide sufficient audit evidence on their own, and accordingly do not effect the nature and extent of other audit evidence that is to be obtained by the cost auditor. Effective Date 7. This standard is to be applied for the period commencing on or after 1st April ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
