Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. SOUTHERN FAST FOOD COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR

2015 (9) TMI 681 - KERLA HIGH COURT

Detention of goods – Condition for release of goods – Petitioner aggrieved by notice detaining consignment of machinery and parts that was purchased by petitioner and also by imposition of security deposit as condition for release of goods and vehicl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

address – Discrepancy in description of place to which goods were consigned and explanation offered by petitioner has to be examined by adjudicating authority – Therefore 2nd respondent directed to release goods and vehicle to petitioner on petition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. FOR THE PETITIONER : SRI.M.SREEKUMAR FOR THE RESPONDENT : GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGMENT : The petitioner, who is a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act is aggrieved by Ext.P5 de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ust pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 3. On a considerati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ally that, while the delivery address shown in the invoice that accompanied the goods was Ramada Hotel (Muralia Group) Palayam Trivandrum, on a verification of the details available in KVATIS, it was found that the petitioner had no branch or godown .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

would submit that, the machinery and parts was actually intended for the use of the petitioner and the premises to which it was consigned was the premises of the sister concern of the petitioner and the petitioner wanted to stock the goods at the sa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version