Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Mr. S.R. Nandakishore Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Tambaram.

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT(A) AO has omitted to cause enquiries in respect of business of buying and selling lands and development of lands by plotting them by the assessee and whether these activities are assessable under business income or under the head income from capital gains - Held that:- Assessing Officer neither called for any details with regard to the activities of the assessee nor made any enquiries before allowing the claims of the assessee while completing the assessment. Order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g the Assessing Officer to do the assessment de novo examining all the issues. Accordingly, we uphold the impugned order of the Commissioner of Income Tax and dismiss the appeal of the assessee. - Decided against assessee. - I.T. A.No.984/Mds/2014 - Dated:- 19-8-2015 - SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI AND SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JJ. For The Appellant : Mr. N. Devanathan, Advocate For The Respondent : Dr. U. Anjaneyalu, CIT ORDER Per Challa Nagendra Prasad, JM: This appeal is filed by the assessee again .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ance with law. 2. Brief facts are that assessee, an individual, filed return of income for the assessment year 2009-10 on 31.10.2009 declaring total income of ₹ 1,07,35,030/-. Assessment was completed under section 143(3) on 26.12.2011 accepting the income returned. Later, Commissioner of Income Tax passed order under section 263 of the Act setting aside the assessment for de novo consideration to pass fresh assessment in accordance with law for the reason that the Assessing Officer has om .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that Assessing Officer had considered the details and income arising out of sale of lands as capital gains. However, on examining the records and perusing the assessment order, Commissioner of Income Tax was of the view that necessary enquiries were not made by the Assessing Officer on the activities of the assessee and therefore held that assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Thus he set aside the assessment for de novo consideration after giving adequat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the immediately preceding assessment year i. E. 2008-09 and on examination of all the details furnished by the assessee, the Assessing Officer accepted that the activities of the assessee in developing the land, making plots and selling them is not in the nature of business and the gains on such activity are to be assessed only under capital gains. He further submits that on satisfied with the submissions of the assessee, the Assessing Officer dropped 147 assessment and completed the assessment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion. Departmental Representative submits that the Assessing Officer neither called for any details in respect of activities of the assessee nor examined them and passed order without verifying the activities of the assessee and this made the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue and thus the Commissioner of Income Tax has properly exercised the jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act. 5. Heard both sides. Perused orders of lower authorities. In this case, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

either the Assessing Officer called for any details regarding the activities of the assessee nor assessee furnished any materials before the Assessing Officer so as to say that Assessing Officer examined the activities of the assessee and has accepted the claims of the assessee made under capital gains. When asked for reasons for reopening of the assessment for assessment year 2008-09, counsel for the assessee expressed his inability to produce the reasons for reopening. In the absence of reason .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pital gains instead of business income, we are unable to accept the submissions since the Assessing Officer has not examined the activities of the assessee at all. There is no finding as to whether the assessee is co-owner of the land, how he is co-owner of the lands of other co-owners, whether the property is jointly held by the other co-owners along with the assessee and in what way the assessee is concerned with those persons is not clear from record. Further on a perusal of the wealth-tax as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er examined all those things while completing the original assessment under section 143(3) of the Act. Therefore, since the Assessing Officer has not called for any such details in respect of various activities of the assessee like developing lands, selling plots etc. and in the absence of any clarification or statement made in the course of assessment proceedings, it cannot be held that Assessing Officer had examined all these details and formed an opinion and allowed the claim of the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sumption of facts or incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. Similarly, orders passed without applying the principles of natural justice or without application of mind are also erroneous . In the instant case, the Assessing Officer while completing the assessment under section 143(3) never applied his mind to various issues as pointed out by the Commissioner of Income Tax in his order. The Assessing Officer has passed the assessment order allowing .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e order passed was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. 7. The Hon ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Seshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. (242 ITR 490) while examining the powers of Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 observed as under:- That the Commissioner found that the Income-tax Officer was not correct in granting relief with respect to some of the items considered in the original assessment proceedings and from the instances or specimens of so .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version