Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Inayati Footwear Ltd. Versus DCIT–6, Kanpur

Rectification of mistake - assessee had claimed depreciation on Tools, Moulds with Shoe plates, Shoe Lasts @ 30% while depreciation should be allowed @ 15% - Held that:- When the A.O. issued show cause notice to the assessee in this regard, it was submitted by the assessee that the assessee wrongly claimed depreciation on this item but in fact, it is revenue expenditure. The A.O. did not find any merit in this contention and he made disallowance of ₹ 475,063/- being depreciation excess cla .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee has itself treated this expenditure as capital expenditure and claimed depreciation thereon @ 30%. The correct rate of depreciation can be an issue of apparent mistake and it can be decided in the proceedings u/s 154 but whether the expenditure is capital or revenue is a highly debatable issue and such claim cannot be entertained and decided in 154 proceedings. Therefore, we find no merit in the contentions of the assessee. - Decided against assessee.

Deduction u/s 80IB in re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

[2001 (8) TMI 13 - SUPREME Court] and assessee could not show as to what is the infirmity in the order of CIT (A) in following these two judgments or how these judgments are not supporting the case of the revenue. Now, we examine the Clause (v) of the Subsidy Sanction letter stating that if the unit of the assessee becomes non operational within two years, the assessee has to refund the subsidy. Now we are in the year 2015 and this is not the case of the assessee that the assessee has refunded t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

als of the assessee for A.Y. 2008 - 09, out of which, one appeal is arising out of proceedings u/s 154 and the second appeal is arising out of assessment proceedings u/s 143 (3). The third appeal is also filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2009 - 10 and this appeal is arising out of assessment proceedings u/s 143 (3). 2. All these three appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. 3. First, we take up the appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2008 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing the disallowance of ₹ 4,75,063/- out of depreciation claimed by the assessee. 3. Because the CIT (Appeals) has failed to appreciate that depreciation on moulds with shoe plates was wrongly claimed @30% in the depreciation chart on the total expenditure of ₹ 23,47,550/- as against the entire expenditure being of revenue nature itself should ought to have been allowed as allowable business expenditure. 4. Because the CIT (Appeals) has failed to appreciate and has erred in law in no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

amp; H) b) CIT vs. Sunbeam Auto Ltd., ITA No. 351/2012 dated 30.05.2012 (Delhi) Copy on Pages 11 to 13 of the Paper Book. c) CIT vs. Mahalakshmi Textile Mills, 60 ITR 710 (SC) 5. Learned DR of the revenue supported the orders of the lower authorities. 6. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that in the order passed by the A.O. u/s 154 on 15.09.2011, it is noted by the A.O. that the assessment was completed u/s 143 (3) on 03.12.2010. He also observed that I mistake apparent from reco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Learned CIT (A) upheld the assessment order and the assessee is in further appeal before us. Before us, this is not the claim of the assessee that depreciation on Tools, Moulds with Shoe plates & Shoe Lasts is allowable @ 30%. The claim is this that this expense is revenue expenditure. In our considered opinion, whether expenditure is capital expenditure or revenue expenditure is not an issue of apparent mistake, which can be decided u/s 154. This is admitted position that the assessee has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by the learned AR of the assessee, we find that the same are not applicable in the facts of the present case. The first judgment is of Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court rendered in the case of CIT vs. Malerkotla Steels and Alloys P. Ltd. (Supra). In that case, the expenditure in dispute was on account of replacement of Moulds. In the present case, the expenses is not for replacement of moulds because if the existing moulds are being replaced, there will be income on account of sale of scra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at case, the tribunal noted as per Para 5 of that judgment that the moulds and Dies did not have longevity and were replaced frequently. Under these facts, it was held that the expenditure on Moulds and Dies was revenue expenditure. In the present case, we have already noted that the assessee has not shown that any such income on account of sale or closing stock of scrap was accounted for by the assessee. It means, the expenditure in the present case is not for replacement of moulds. Hence, this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the taxable income although under different section. Hence, as per this judgment, the tribunal can and should consider if the assessee claims that the expenditure is allowable under some different section. But this judgment is not in course of proceedings u/s 154 and therefore, not applicable in the present case. Moreover, we have examined the claim of the assessee that the expenditure is revenue expenditure in the light of two judgments and found that in the present case, the assessee could .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

I. T. Act in respect of Duty Draw Back income of ₹ 153,25,958/-. 13. Both sides agreed that this issue is covered against the assessee by the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court rendered in the case of Liberty India, 317 ITR 218. Respectfully following this judgment, we decline to interfere in the order of CIT (A) on this issue. These grounds are rejected. 14. As per Ground No. 5, the grievance of the assessee is about decision of CIT (A) to the effect that subsidy of ₹ 21,53,803/- i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al within two years, the assessee has to refund the subsidy and therefore, the subsidy is conditional. He also submitted that for this reason, it cannot be said that it is part of actual cost. Learned DR of the revenue supported the orders of the lower authorities. 16. We have considered the rival submissions. We find that learned CIT has followed two judgments of Hon ble Apex Court rendered in the case of Sahney Steel, 228 ITR 253 and in the case of Raja ram Maize Products, 251 ITR 427 and lear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lause and hence, in our opinion, this clause has no relevance in the facts of the present case. Hence, on this issue also, we do not find any reason to interfere in the order of CIT (A). 17. In the result, this appeal of the assessee is also dismissed. 18. Not, we take up the appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2009 - 10 arising out of proceedings u/s 143 (3). 19. As per Grounds No. 1 to 2, the only one grievance of the assessee is about not allowing deduction u/s 80IB of the I. T. Act in respect of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: Duty Drawback & Input Credit - under GST

Forum: Input tax credit

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

Highlight: Cenvat credit availed on Club Membership for the Director is not admissible as it cannot be said to be remotely connected with the activity of manufacture

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Manpower Service provider

News: Jaitley asks biz not to wait till last day to file GST returns

Circular: Implementing Electronic Sealing for containers by exporters under self-sealing procedure prescribed by Circular 26/2017-Cus dated 1st July, 2017 and Circular 36/2017 dated 28 th August, 2017. — reg.

Forum: Construction of single unit bungalow

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version