Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Special Tools (P) Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Ghaziabad

Disallowance of MODVAT Credit - Whether Tribunal was justified in rejecting the alternative plea of the appellants that their claim ought to have been considered in terms of Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules 1944, merely because the same was not taken earlier - Held that:- Findings recorded in the order in original and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals ) that the process being carried out by the appellants on the defective goods for rectification was not the same which were adopted by t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tigation and that too contrary to their own stand taken before the Adjudicating Authority. Thus, the Tribunal has not committed any error of law in rejecting the alternate plea of the appellants. The impugned order of the Tribunal suffers from no infirmity. - Decided against assessee. - Central Excise Appeal No. - 75 of 2004 - Dated:- 6-8-2015 - Hon'ble Tarun Agarwala And Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani, JJ. For the Appellant : A. P. Mathur For the Respondent : S. S. C., Ashok Singh ORDE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aken earlier ?" Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the Tribunal has committed a manifest error of law in rejecting the alternate plea of the appellant that their claim ought to have been considered in terms of Rule 173-H of the erstwhile Central Excise Rule 1944 and it could not have been rejected merely on the ground that it was not claimed by the appellants earlier. Learned counsel for the respondent supports the impugned order of the Tribunal. Briefly stated the facts of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ional authority requiring the appellants to show cause as to why Modvat credit so taken by them amounting to ₹ 1,04,974.70 and ₹ 90,839.66 may not be disallowed in terms of the provisions of Rule 57A read with Rule 57-G of the Rules. By an order in original No.66/97 dated 28.10.1997, the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise Division-II, Ghaziabad disallowed the Modvat credit of ₹ 1,04,975/-. By another order in original No.13/98 dated 20.2.1998, the Modvat credit of ₹ 9 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nal order No.A/186-187/01/NB dated 30.1.2001 for limited purpose of ascertaining as to whether defective parts returned by the appellants' Customers had, infact, been reprocessed by the appellants in their factory in the same manner as they used to process their raw-material for manufacture of their final products in the normal course and if it is found that the appellant's had undertaken such reprocessing, they will be eligible for the modvat credit in question. The appellants accepted .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e goods in question received by them. The adjudicating authority, however, found that the same process was not being carried out by the appellants and the processing conducted by them for rectification did not amount to manufacture. Consequently, the Adjudicating authority disallowed the modvat credit vide order in original No.45-46 of 2001 dated 26.11.2001. Aggrieved with this order, the appellants preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs and Central Excise, Ghazibad, whic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

adjudicating authority that the processes being carried out by the appellants on the defective goods for rectification was not the same which were being adopted by them in the manufacture of their final products. That being so, the appellants had been rightly disallowed the modvat credit. The contention of the learned counsel that the claim of the appellants under Rule 173H should have been in the alternative consideration as they made a request before the adjudicating authority in this regard, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ule 173H. They only submitted flow charts in respect of the various processes that had been taken by them to rectify the defective goods, which was duly considered by the adjudicating authority, but no request for considering the claim under Rule 173H was ever filed. Therefore, for the first time at this stage, they cannot be permitted to urge for the consideration of their claim under the said Rule. In view of the discussion made above, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order and the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version