Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Taiyo Membrane Corporation Pty. Ltd. Versus Shapoorji Pallonji & CO. Ltd.

2015 (9) TMI 812 - SUPREME COURT

Application seeking appointment of an arbitrator - The area of dispute is small and narrow, namely, the entitlement of the petitioner to 5% of his claimed dues which, according to the petitioner, has been wrongly withheld by the respondent. - Held that:- the Court does not find any ambiguity or inconsistency in the description of parties so as to non-suit the applicant-petitioner by dismissing its application on the above basis. The ambiguity, if any, in the description of the parties having bee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rbitrator the Court is inclined to grant the prayers made. Accordingly, Dr. Justice M.K. Sharma, a former Judge of this Court is appointed as the sole Arbitrator. - Arbitration Case (Civil) No. 2 of 2015 - Dated:- 9-9-2015 - Ranjan Gogoi, J. JUDGMENT 1. This application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) has been lodged by one Taiyo Membrane Corporation Pty. Ltd. seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve certain disputes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r alia, on the ground that the contractual obligations incumbent on the petitioner/applicant have not been fulfilled without which the demand for release of the amount, as aforesaid, is not justified. As the said objection itself raises an arbitrable issue the same need not engage the attention of the Court. Such attention, however, has to be focused on the principal objection of the respondent. The same is to the effect that the two of the sub-agreements were between Taiyo Membrane Corporation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he respondent to appoint the arbitrator so as to warrant an order from the Court under Section 11(6) of the Act. It is also urged that one of the sub-agreements being between two Indian entities i.e. Taiyo Membrane Corporation (India) and the respondent Company any appointment of an arbitrator would fall outside the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 11(6) of the Act. 4. The above objections of the respondent have been sought to be met by the petitioner by filing a rejoinder affidavit to p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iyo Membrane Corporation are one and the same entity. Insofar as the agreements executed by Taiyo Membrane Corporation (India) is concerned, it is urged that the above position has also been clarified by subsequent communications exchanged between the respondent Company and Taiyo Membrane Corporation Pty. Ltd. with respect to the work covered by the agreement in which one of the parties is Taiyo Membrane Corporation (India). 5. While it is correct that there is some confusion with regard to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version