2015 (9) TMI 816

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... titioner was demanded to pay sum together with interest from 17.11.1995 – Held that:- respondent contended that order referred to which was allegedly communicated to petitioner, there is no proof for despatch of same and there is no acknowledgment on file – Hence, accepting contention of petitioner, impugned order passed by first respondent is set aside – Consequently, impugned recovery notice iss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .1995. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent contended that the order referred to which was communicated to the petitioner, there is no proof for despatch of the same and there is no acknowledgment on the file. Hence, accepting the contention of the petitioner the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Original No.948/2009-Gr-7 (ACC), dated 30.12.2009 is set aside. Consequently, the i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X