Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Piramal Glass Ltd Versus C.C.E. & S.T. -Surat-ii

2015 (9) TMI 822 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

Admissibility of Cenvat Credit of Mobile Phone Services, Garden Maintenance Services and for fencing of the Factory Premises - held that:- It is observed from the Case Laws relied upon the appellant [2011 (9) TMI 509 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD], and [2008 ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eriods even first appellant’s authority and Adjudicating Authority have themselves allowed credit on the same issues - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No : E/1200-1202/2011 - Order No. 11024-11026/2015 - Dated:- 14-7-2015 - MR. H.K. THAKUR, J .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Mobile Phone Services, Garden Maintenance Services and making of Fencing Services availed by the appellant. 2) Shri Mehul Jivani (consultant) appearing on behalf of the Appellant argued that Cenvat Credit on Mobile Phone Services is covered by the fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

angalore) It was further argued that subsequently Commissioner(Appeals) vide OIA No. CCEA-SRT-II SSP-269 Dated 08/02/2013 and Adjudicating Authority under OIO No. R-V ?ANK-III?01-04?PK?15-16 Dated 12/05/2015 in their own cases, have allowed Cenvat Cr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vices utilised for Fencing learned consultant relied upon the case law of Nirma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Custom Excise and Service Tax Vadodara-I [2013 (32) STR 622 (Tribunal-Ahmedabad)]. It was his case that the Fencing was got done for the addition .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nical) Central Excise Division-III, Surat-II. 3) Shri T.K. Sikdar (Authorised Representative) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that the services availed by the appellant are not in or in relation to the manufacture of the excisable goods hen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version