Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 851 - DELHI HIGH COURT

2015 (9) TMI 851 - DELHI HIGH COURT - [2016] 381 ITR 416 - Income as profits in lieu of salary - whether ITAT fall into error in holding that the sum recived was compensation in the hands of the Assessee and could not be treated as income as profits in lieu of salary and allowing the credit of TDS? - Held that:- The Court is unable to accept the interpretation sought to be placed on the plain language of Section 17 (3) (iii) of the Act by the Revenue. The words "from any person" occurring therei .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the provision, viz., the existence of ‘employment’ i.e. a relationship of employer and employee between the person who makes the payment of the amount and the Assessee.

The Court accordingly concurs with the concurrent view of the CIT (A) and the ITAT that this was a case where there was no commencement of the employment and that the offer by ACEE to the Assessee was withdrawn even prior to the commencement of such employment. The amount received by the Assessee was a capital receipt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its in lieu of salary. It was a capital receipt that could not be taxed as income under any other head. - Decided in favour of the Assessee

Also the order of the CIT (A), as concurred with by the ITAT, that the Assessee is entitled to the refund of the TDS paid on ₹ 1,95,00,000/- and that the refund of TDS may be adjusted against tax demand if any arising on appeal effect being given to the said order of the CIT (A) is upheld. - Decided in favour of the Assessee - ITA 203/2014 - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2008-09. 2. By an order dated 9th February, 2015, the following questions of law were framed: (a) Did the ITAT fall into error in holding that the sum of ₹ 1,95,00,000/- in the circumstances of the case, was compensation in the hands of the Assessee and could not be treated as income as profits in lieu of salary? (b) Did the ITAT fall into error in allowing the order of the CIT (Appeals) in allowing the credit of TDS of ₹ 22,09,350 on ₹ 1,95,00,000/- to the respondent? 3. The f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee was asked to furnish the bank accounts for the period 1st April, 2007 to 31st August, 2008. The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed a credit entry of ₹ 1,70,90,650/-. The Assessee filed a letter on 16th November, 2010 explaining the circumstances under which the payment was received from M/s. ACEE Enterprises ('ACEE') against an Employment Agreement entered into between him and ACEE on 10th January, 2007. In terms of the said Employment Agreement, the Assessee was to be employed a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat there was a "sudden change in business plan of the Company vis-a-vis foraying into new financial ventures" and that "the company is extremely disappointed to convey that it shall not be able to take you on board from 1st July, 2007 as per employment contract." ACEE promised to reconsider the Assessee s services "as and when its operation starts". The second letter was dated 15th May 2007 which was the Assessee's response to ACEE that the news was a "big .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sation offered to me by your company to cover up the financial loss incurred by me". 6. On 25th August 2007, ACEE informed the Assessee that "as a mark of goodwill/gesture" it was pleased to announce a payment of ₹ 1,95,00,000/- to the Assessee subject to income tax compliances as "a one-time payment to you for non-commencement of employment as proposed." Before the AO, the Assessee pointed out that the tax of ₹ 22,09,350/- had been deducted at source by a le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

quot;by any Assessee from any person" introduced by the Finance Act, 2001 with effect from 1st April, 2002. The AO also sought to distinguish the decision in CIT v. Rani Shankar Mishra (2010) 320 ITR 542 (Del) which was referred to by the Assessee on the ground that the compensation in that case was received pursuant to a gender discrimination claim stemming from the company s refusal to offer the woman candidate a position whereas in the present case the job was offered and accepted. The A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT(A)]. The CIT(A) noted that Clause (iii) of Section 17(3) had been brought in to account for joining bonus' received from the prospective employer as profit in lieu of salary liable to be included as part of taxable income under the head salary or also the amount paid to an employee 'after the employment comes to an end (termination bonus). The CIT (A), after analysing the documents on record, came to the conclusion that there was no master and servant relationship between the Appella .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in Rani Shankar Mishra (supra) to conclude that the said receipt could not be taxed as a business/professional receipt under Section 28 or as a gift under Section 56 of the Act. The CIT(A) concluded that the receipt by the Assessee was bonafide and, accordingly, deleted the addition. The CIT (A) further ordered that "the appellant is entitled to refund of TDS paid on ₹ 1,95,00,000/- and accordingly the refund of TDS may be adjusted against tax demand if any arising on appeal effect to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her the Ld. CIT (A) was correct in allowing the credit of TDS of ₹ 22,09,350/- on Rs.l.95 crore to the assessee?" 10. On the first issue, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A) that prior to the coming into existence of any relationship of employer and employee between the Assessee and ACEE, the offer on the basis of which the employment agreement was drawn up had itself come to an end. This was a case where a prospective employee i.e. the Assessee had been compensated for denial of oppor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i, learned counsel for the Assessee. 12. Mr. Sawhney urged that since the wording of Section 17(3)(iii) of the Act was that "any amount received from any person", it was not necessary that the amount had to be received only from an employer in order that such sum be brought to tax in the hands of an assessee under the head 'profits in lieu of salary'. It was submitted that the expression "any person" could include a prospective employer as in the present case. It was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n behalf of the Revenue. The Employment Agreement itself mentions that the employment shall commence latest by 1st July, 2007 . Although it further states that the employee "shall endeavour to join the company as early as possible", the intention and expectation of the parties was that the employment would commence not earlier than 1st July 2007. This becomes evident from a reading of the letter dated 1st May 2007 written by ACEE to the Assessee in which it stated that that it would no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

anguage of Section 17 (3) (iii) of the Act by the Revenue. The words "from any person" occurring therein have to be read together with the following words in sub-clause (A): "before his joining any employment with that person". In other words, Section 17 (3) (iii) (A) pre-supposes the existence of an employment, i.e., a relationship of employee and employer between the Assessee and the person who makes the payment of "any amount" in terms of Section 17 (3) (iii) of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version