Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Finolex Cables Limited Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 9, Pune and Vica-Versa

Deduction u/s. 80IB for Goa Unit in respect of sale of scrap - Held that:- Madras High Court judgment in the case of M/s Fenner India Ltd (1998 (4) TMI 67 - MADRAS High Court ) for the proposition that the profit on sale of scrap material since had a direct link or nexus with the industrial undertaking and therefore, it is eligible for deduction u/s 80IB, Considering the similarity in language used in sections 80HH and 80IB of the Act, we are of the considered opinion that the assessee should su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ciation has been allowed for the three assessment years, the depreciation cannot be denied in the subsequent assessment years on the written down value. The asset cannot be taken out of block of assets. Similar view has been taken by the Tribunal in the case of Kodak Polychrome Graphics (I) (P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT (2013 (9) TMI 481 - ITAT MUMBAI ). - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No. 360/PN/2014, ITA Nos. 564 & 565/PN/2014 - Dated:- 31-8-2015 - SHRI R.K. PANDA AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JJ. For Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

4 against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2007-08. 2. The Revenue in both the appeals have assailed the orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for respective assessment years on one ground i.e. allowing deduction u/s. 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Goa Unit in respect of sale of scrap. The assessee in appeal has raised solitary ground which reads as under: On facts & in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeals are common. All the appeals are taken up together for adjudication. 3. The brief facts of the case are The assessee is a company registered under the Companies Act and is engaged in manufacturing and sale of insulated wires and cables, optic fiber cables, corrugated PVC, foam sheets, finance, trading in goods, leasing etc. The assessee in its return of income for the impugned assessment years had claimed deduction u/s. 80IB for its unit located at Goa. In the claim of deduction, the ass .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee preferred appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the additions/disallowances made by the Assessing Officer. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) vide impugned orders for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2007-08 accepted the plea of assessee with regard to deduction u/s. 80IB on income from sale of scrap at Goa Unit. With regard to disallowance of depreciation on intangible assets, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the findings of the Assessing Of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the assessee is eligible for claiming deduction u/s. 80IB. This view was subsequently followed by the Co-ordinate Bench of Tribunal in ITA No. 1975/PN/2013 for assessment year 2004-05. 5. Shri Rajesh Damor representing the department fairly admitted that this issue has been considered by the Tribunal in assessee s own case in assessment years 2002-03 and 2004-05. However, the ld. DR supported the findings of Assessing Officer on this issue. 6. We have heard the submissions made by the repr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vant extract of the order of Tribunal in ITA No. 105/PN/2007 is as under: 27. Ground no. 6 relates to CIT(A)'s direction to the A.O to allow the deduction u/s 80-IB of the Act in respect of scrap generated out of manufacturing process treating the same as business income. The A.O observed that the scrap is not a bye product of the assessee and hence the sale of the same cannot be treated as the business income of the unit and hence not eligi9ble for deduction u/s 80-IB of the Act. As regards .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

A) has confirmed the view taken by the A.O on this issue. 28. At the very outset, the Learned Counsel for the assessee has mentioned that the said issue is also covered in favour of the assessee by virtue of .Madras High Court judgment in the case of M/s Fenner India Ltd (241 ITR 803) for the proposition that the profit on sale of scrap material since had a direct link or nexus with the industrial undertaking and therefore, it is eligible for deduction u/s 80IB, Considering the similarity in lan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cumstances in the impugned assessment years, we do not find any reason to take a different view. Accordingly, we uphold the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on this issue and dismiss both the appeals of the Revenue. 8. Now, we will take up the appeal of assessee. The assessee in its appeal has impugned the findings of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in denying depreciation on intangible assets. The ld. AR submitted that the assessee has set up a plant for manufacturing of optic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of preform, worldwide. Since, Shin Etsu had substantial control over the world market, it become the single source supplier of preform to the assessee. As per the long term supply agreement dated 07-12-2000, Shin Etsu would supply 400 kgs of preforms per month for a period of three years starting from October, 2001. Thereafter, another agreement dated 20-01-2001 was executed. According to the second agreement 200 kgs preform per month would be supplied by Shin Etsu for a a period of 5 years star .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of 285 million Japanese Yen for the unsupplied quantity under 200 kg and 400 kg agreement. The rate of preforms was revised from 70.5 Japanese Yen to 38 Japanese Yen. The assessee agreed to pay a lumpsum amount of 285 million Japanese Yen to protect its business interest and secure source of supply of critical raw material. Since, the lumpsum payment was made to secure advantage of enduring nature, the assessee treated the same as capital in nature. Accordingly, it was added in the block of asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m payment and claiming depreciation on the same after capitalization of the amount. The Assessing Officer raised objection on the claim of depreciation on the said amount for the first time in assessment year 2007-08. The ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the depreciation was claimed on the written down value brought forward from assessment year 2006-07. The intangible assets were created on acquisition of commercial rights and were capitalized in assessment year 2004-05. The disallowance of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is a trading transaction. No capital asset had come into existence on which depreciation can be claimed. The assessee has made payment without actual delivery of the alleged capital asset. In fact, the payment made by the assessee is in the nature of speculative loss. As far as reassessment proceedings are concerned, they have nothing to do with the disallowance of depreciation on intangible asset. The ld. DR pointed out that a perusal of reassessment order would show that the assessee has alrea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

chase of preforms at a reduced rate. It is neither speculative loss nor it is revenue expenditure. 11. We have heard the submissions of rival sides at length and have examined the orders of the authorities below. As far as the facts are concerned, the Revenue has not raised any dispute. The only point of contention is; Whether the assessee is eligible to claim depreciation on the payment of lumpsum amount paid by assessee to Shin Etsu for the supply of raw material (preform) at the reduced rate? .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the ground that no capital asset was acquired by the assessee. No intangible asset, like technical knowhow, had come into existence, therefore, the assessee cannot claim depreciation on the payments made to Shin Etsu. In the first appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) rejected the claim of assessee with following observations: 14. I have carefully considered the facts of the case as well as reply of the appellant, in this case, undisputed fact remains that the amount in question has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd reduce the prices of preforms. Therefore, 1 do not find any infirmity in the order of Assessing Officer, The claim of the appellant that the amount was part of WDV brought down from earlier years is also unsustainable as wrongly brought down WDV cannot be accepted as sacrosanct. Therefore, I do not find any merit in the ground taken and therefore, the same is dismissed. 12. The assessee in the period relevant to assessment year 2004-05 had capitalized the amount of 285 million Japanese Yen an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version