Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 904 - ITAT DELHI

2015 (9) TMI 904 - ITAT DELHI - [2015] 43 ITR (Trib) 270 (ITAT [Del]) - Interest u/s 234C - Date of presentation of cheque - whether the interest charged u/s 234C is to be computed from the date of presentation/ tendering of cheque of tax payment into bank or from the date of clearance from the Bank Account of the assessee? - Held that:- Cheques issued have not been dishonored and so respectfully following the judgment of CIT Vs. REPCO Home Finance Ltd (2014 (11) TMI 487 - MADRAS HIGH COURT ) an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. Sujit Kumar, SR. DR ORDER Per O. P. Kant, A. M. These three appeals of the assessee are directed against three separate orders of the Commissioner of Income-Tax( Appeals)- XXVIII, New Delhi dated 16.9.2013 in relation to assessment year 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12. The main grievance raised in appeals is in respect of charging of interest u/s 234C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act ), the quantum of which charged in different years is as under:- ITA No. Assessment Year Amount of in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in noting that Circular No. 261 dated 08.08.1979 is not binding and has further erred in noting that OLTAS system has replaced the tax payments and that the circular no. 261 issued in 1979 is not binding on the Department. 3. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has further erred in ignoring the facts of the case including the copies of the challan, bank statements to show that the payments were debited in the bank account before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

amend, vary, omit or substitute any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal at any time before or at the time of hearing of the appeal 3. Ground Nos. 1 and 5 being general in nature, no adjudication is required. 4. In Ground Nos. 2 and 3, the assessee has challenged the action of the ld commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [ in short CIT(A) ] in ignoring the circulars issued by the CBDT in respect of giving credit for tax payment . In Ground No. 4, the assessee has challenged interest of ₹ 25,5 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ax. The return filed electronically was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act by the Centralized Processing Centre (in short CPC ) of the Income Tax Department located at Bangalore. In the said order an interest of ₹ 27,534/- u/s 234C of the Act was charged by the Assessing Officer (in short AO ) as against interest of ₹ 2,022/- computed by the assessee. The assessee paid the advance tax payment through tendering of cheques in designated Banks. While computing the interest u/s 234C of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

grieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the ld CIT(A) raising the following grounds:- a) Whether while framing the intimation u/s 143(1) the above said circular is being followed by CPC; b) Whether if the glaring mistake is pointed out by the assessee by filing rectification online any steps are being taken by the CPC by either transferring it to the Jurisdictional ITO or asking for further information before rejecting the application u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, by critically nothing THE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ayment for the purpose of computing interest u/s 234C rather than the date of clearing of the cheque. The assessee also submitted details of the dates of tendering of cheques and clearing of the same, which is reproduced as under:- Due date Date cheque tendered Debited to assessee's bank A/c Date of challan as per 26AS Amount 15.09.2008 12.09.2008 15.09.2008 16.09.2008 4,20,000 15.12.2008 12.12-2008 15.12.2008 16.12.2009 3,00,000 15.03.2009 12,03.2009 14.03.2009 17.03.2009 5,00,000 8. The CI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cases where taxes are paid through cheque, the date of payment could be the date offender of cheque to the authorized banker or the date of clearance of cheque from the payer's account. Payments to government accounts were regulated by Central Treasury Rules (Old Rules). As per the said rules when a cheque/draft is honoured the payment shall be deemed to have been made on the date the cheque/draft is handed over to the government's bankers or to a government officer authorized to receive .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue/draft shall be the date on which it was cleared and entered in the receipt scroll; However a High Powered Committee (HPC) was constituted by Reserve Bank for setting up OLTAS in January 2003. The HPC set up a Sub-Committee to suggest the Accounting Procedure for Online Tax Accounting System. The Accounting procedure duly approved by CGA and CAG was introduced for OLTAS w.e.f June 01, 2004. The new accounting procedure was forwarded to all agency banks on April 16, 2004. The salient features o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Under the new procedure, banks were advised to issue acknowledgement in respect of Challan tendered with clearing cheques/drafts (i.e. other than cash and transfer cheques/drafts) only after-the realization of such cheques/drafts. Banks were further advised to issue paper token in respect of such Challan indicating the date offender and the date on which the counterfoil will be kept for delivery. The receiving banker was advised to return the tear-off portion of taxpayers' counterfoil on rea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome Tax Department is concerned. Thus the interest has been computed as per this duly approved new procedure and as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act. The chargeability of interest is therefore upheld. 9. Aggrieved, the assessee is before us. 10. At the time of hearing, ld. AR of the assessee focused his arguments mainly on ground No.4 and in support relied on the CBDT Circular (supra), which was also submitted in the appellate proceeding before the CIT(A) and further placed reliance on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of tax payment into bank or from the date of clearance from the Bank Account of the assessee. 12. The aforesaid controversy has been settled by their lordship in recent judgment in the case of CIT vs. REPCO Home Finance ltd. (Supra). The relevant para of judgment is reproduced as under:- 5. The issue raised in this appeal is no longer res integra in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in CITv. Ogale Glass Works Ltd. 19541 25 1TR 529, wherein it is held as under: "11. ...... When it .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

maturity. In Byles on Bills, 20th Edn., p. 23 the position is summarized pithily as follows: 'A cheque, unless dishonoured, is payment.' To the same effect are the passages to be found in Hart on Banking, 4th Edn. Vol. I, p. 342. In Felix Hadley & Co. v. Hadley, [1898] 2 Chd. 680 Byrne, J. expressed the same idea in the following passage in his judgment at p. 682: 'In this case I think what took place amounted to a conditional payment of the debt; the condition being that the ch .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

;Apart from the express terms of Section 33 sub-section 1, a similar conclusion might be founded on the well-known common law rules as to the effect of the sending of a cheque in payment of a debt, and in the fact that though the payment is subject to the condition subsequent that the cheque must be met on presentation, the date of payment, if the cheque is duly met, is the date when the cheque was posted.' In the case before us none of the cheques has been dishonoured on presentation and pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the payment related back to the dates of the receipt of the cheques and in law the dates of payments were the dates of the delivery of the cheques" (Emphasis supplied) 6. The above said view of the Supreme Court was reiterated by a recent decision of the Supreme Court in DIT (Exemption) v. Raunaq Education Foundation [2013] 350 ITR 420/213 Taxman 19/29 taxmann.com. 150. 7. It is not the case of the department that the cheque issued by the assessee was dishonored. Once the cheque issued by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version