GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 924 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2015 (9) TMI 924 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - 2015 (323) E.L.T. 328 (Mad.) - Maintainability of appeal - benefit of Notification No.21 of 2002 - What will be the rate of duty that is payable by the first respondent, but for the notification in question. - Held that:- Court is fortified by a decision of the Gujarat High Court in Commissioner of Central Excise v. JBF Industries Ltd., [2010 (12) TMI 437 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT], - Following this decision; appeal is not maintainable and accordingly, the same .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Chennai, by raising the following questions of law: "1. Whether "end use" certificates issued in terms of notification 21/02-Cus would have any relevance to decide the duty liability when admittedly 15% of the material are not "melting scraps" and do not qualify for duty exemption as per the said notification? 2. Whether an assessment to duty is based on the condition and nature of the goods found at the time of import and not upon the end .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty to pay duty arise only at the time of clearance? 3. Whether the direction of the Tribunal to extend duty concession on 15% of the goods not covered by the exemption notification by accepting the end use certificate is against the conditions of the Test bond executed by the first respondent on the basis of which the goods were provisionally released and therefore not admissible in law?" 2.1. The first respondent had filed bill of entry dated 14.5.2002 for clearance of 150 MTS of goods des .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m IIT, Chennai, after releasing the goods provisionally. The IIT, Chennai gave a report stating that 85% of the material consisted of rusted components and could be considered as non-alloy melting scrap. However, 15% of the material could be considered as second grade spanner component, which were not re-usable. Hence, the case was adjudicated and the Adjudicating Authority passed an order demanding duty for the 15% of the goods, which were treated as re-usable components. 2.2 Aggrieved by such .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e in or supply to a unit for the purpose of melting.The Tribunal further held that the assessee had produced the certificate in terms of Customs Notification No.17 of 2001 dated 1.3.2001.The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand directing the Adjudicating Authority to adjudicate the case afresh since Notification No.17 of 2001 is pari materia to Notification No.21 of 2002. 2.4. Aggrieved by the said order, the department has filed the present appeal on the questions of law, referred supra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal on the issue relating to rate of duty of excise or value of goods for purposes of assessment would not lie before this Court. He placed strong reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in Navin Chemicals Manufacturing and Trading Co. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, 1993 (68) ELT 3 (SC), wherein it is held as under: 11. It will be seen that sub-section (5) uses the said expression determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty or to the value of goods for the purpose .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in matters that the said Act provides for. Although this Explanation expressly confines the definition of the said expression to sub-section (5) of Section 129-D, it is proper that the said expression used in the other parts of the said Act should be interpreted similarly. The statutory definition accords with the meaning we have given to the said expression above. Questions relating to the rate of duty and to the value of goods for purposes of assessment are questions that squarely fall within .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cates that it has to be read to limit its application to cases where, for the purposes of assessment, questions arise directly and proximately as to the rate of duty or the value of the goods. 12. This, then, is the test for the purposes of determining whether or not an appeal should be heard by a Special Bench of CEGAT, whether or not a reference by CEGAT lies to the High Court and whether or not an appeal lies directly to the Supreme Court from a decision of CEGAT: does the question that requi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version