New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 947 - ITAT PUNE

2015 (9) TMI 947 - ITAT PUNE - [2015] 43 ITR (Trib) 335 (ITAT [Pune]) - Denial of deduction u/s.80E - AO denied the deduction on the ground that the same is allowably only in case of Indian Educational Institutes which are authorised in India and naturally not for Abroad or Foreign education institutes - Held that:- We find merit in the submission of assessee that there is no such stipulation u/s.80E of the I.T. Act that the education should be in India only. Had there been such an intention by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ngineering in Washington, United States of America after completing his Secondary Education examination or its equivalent and since the interest expenditure is not in dispute, therefore, we do not find any reason as to why the assessee shall not get the benefit of deduction u/s.80E of the I.T. Act. In this view of the matter, we set aside the order of the CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction u/s.80E of the I.T. Act. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No.332/PN/2014 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and filed his return of income declaring total income at ₹ 61,03,220/-. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer asked the assessee to explain as to why the deduction claimed u/s.80E amounting to ₹ 73,125/- should not be disallowed since the same is allowable only in case of higher education pursued in Indian Educational Institutes duly authorised in India and not for higher education pursu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cer disallowed the claim of deduction u/s.80E amounting to ₹ 73,125/- on the ground that the educational institute is not authorised by any of the authorities as mentioned in section 80E(3)(c) of the I.T. Act. 4. Before CIT(A) it was submitted that the son of the assessee is taking higher education in Washington, United States of America and nowhere in the provisions it is mentioned that the Education should be taken in India only for claiming deduction u/s.80R. 5. However, the Ld.CIT(A) a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee has not furnished any evidence that the University where his son is undertaking education is approved either by the Central Govt. or by any other authority authorised for this purpose. Secondly and more importantly, there is no evidence to suggest that he is pursuing higher education. The assessee has not even given name or program undertaken by his son in any of the authorised University or Institute and no details are furnished about the higher education of the son of the assessee. He .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inding that the assessee s son is taking higher education, i.e. MS Electrical Engineering in Washington, United States of America which according to him is not recognised by any of the authorities mentioned in section 80E(3)(c) of the I.T. Act. However, as per the requirement of the said section, it is any course of studies pursued after passing the Senior Secondary or its equivalent from any University or Board recognised by the Central Govt. He submitted that the Ld.CIT(A) confirmed the disall .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o Rounak Nitin Muthiyan. He submitted that the son of the assessee has gone to U.S. for higher studies after completing his Bachelor of Engineering in Electronics & Telecommunication Branch from University of Pune. He submitted that since the Assessing Officer has already given a categorical finding about the higher education taken by the son of the assessee, therefore, the observation made by the CIT(A) are mere surmises. He submitted that there is no stipulation u/s.80E of the I.T. Act tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Referring to various decisions he submitted that when the section has not imposed any condition about education in India, the deduction as claimed by the assessee should not be disallowed. 9. The Ld. Departmental Representative on the other hand heavily relied on the order of the CIT(A). 10. We have considered rival argument made by both the sides. The payment of interest on loan is not in dispute. The dispute is only regarding allowability of the interest u/s.80E of the I.T. Act. We find the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ative]. (2) The deduction specified in sub-section (1) shall be allowed in computing the total income in respect of the initial assessment year and seven assessment years immediately succeeding the initial assessment year or until the interest referred to in sub-section (1) is paid by the assessee in full, whichever is earlier. (3) For the purposes of this section,- (a) approved charitable institution means an institution specified in, or, as the case may be, an institution established for chari .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lf; (c) higher education means any course of study pursued after passing the Senior Secondary Examination or its equivalent from any school, board or university recognised by the Central Government or State Government or local authority or by any other authority authorised by the Central Government or State Government or local authority to do so; (d) initial assessment year means the assessment year relevant to the previous year, in which the assessee starts paying the interest on the loan;] (e) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

furnished any evidence that the university where his son is undertaking education is approved either by the Central Govt. or by any other authority authorised for this purpose and the assessee has not given the name of the course or program undertaken by his son in any of the university or institute. 12. So far as the objections of the Ld.CIT(A) are concerned, we find the Assessing Officer has categorically mentioned in the assessment order that the assessee s son is taking higher education (MS .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version