Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Bain Capital Advisors (India) Private Limited Versus DCIT, Circle-3 (3) , Mumbai

Transfer pricing adjustment - computation of the arm’s length price of the International Transaction in respect of a provision of Investment Advisory Services - selection of comparables - Held that:- As respectfully following the order of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case in the immediately preceding assessment year 2009-2010, we direct the AO to exclude M/s Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt Ltd from the list of comparables and to recompute the adjustment to be made u/s.92C(1) of the I. T. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in non-binding investment advisory support services. since IDFC is functionally different, we direct the AO to exclude the IDFC from the list of comparables for computing arms’ length adjustment.

In view of the above, we direct the AO to recompute the arms length adjustment after excluding Motilal Oswal Investment Advisory Pvt. Ltd. and IDFC from the list of comparables. - Decided in favour of assessee for statistical purposes. - ITA No.413/Mum/2015 - Dated:- 15-5-2015 - SHRI I. P. B .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, OSD 3(2) ('AO') / the Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax, Transfer Pricing - 1(3), Mumbai of including Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Private Limited and IDFC Investment Advisors Limited as comparable companies for determining the arm's length price of provision of Investment Advisory Services and thereby making an adjustment of ₹ 1O,1O,77,849.. To the said international transaction of the Appellant. The Appellant prays that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The Appellant prays that the Ld. AO/ TPO be directed to include such provision as part of operating expenses. 2. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. Facts in brief are that the assessee company was set up during the financial year 2008-09 as a 99% owned subsidiary of Bain Capital Mauritius, a Mauritius based Private Limited Liability Company. The assessee company is engaged in the business of providing investment research and advisory services to Bain Mauritius, on a non-exclus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e TPO was not justified in including Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Private Limited and IDFC Investment Advisors Limited as comparable companies for determining the arms length price of provision of Investment Advisory Services. Ld. AR placed on record order of Tribunal in assessee s own case for immediately preceding assessment year 2009-2010, wherein the Tribunal has directed the AO to exclude M/s Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt Ltd from the list of comparables and to recompute the ad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

research into the finance and business activities and corporate as in the case of investment research and advisory. Thus, as per the ld. CITDR, the activities of the two companies are comparable and the TPO after due consideration has taken the M/s Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt Ltd as suitable comparable while making arms length adjustment to the international transaction of the assessee. 5. We have considered rival contentions, carefully gone through the orders of the authorities below .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ation of the Tribunal was as under :- 2. The grievance of the assessee relates to computation of the arm s length price of the International Transaction in respect of a provision of Investment Advisory Services. 3. We have considered rival contentions and found that adjustment has been made by the AO/TPO by comparing assessee s case with Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. 4. Ld. AR placed on record various decisions of Tribunal, wherein M/s Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reme OPM. A perusal of the Director‟s report of Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt Ltd shows that during the year under consideration, the said company has completed 23 assignments successfully as against 14 completed in the immediately preceding year. A close look at the financial statements of the said company show that the income from operations have been shown only as advisory fees whereas it is admittedly an undisputed facts that the said company is engaged in diversified activitie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to consider Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Pvt Ltd as a comparable for determination of ALP…………. Other decisions relied upon by the learned AR are as under :- i) Temasek Holdings Advisors (P) Ltd.(ITA No.4203/M/2012, dated 30-8-2013); and ii) Acumen Fund Advisory Services (I) Pvt. Ltd.(ITA No.143/M/14, dated 4-7-2014). 5. In view of the above, respectfully following the various orders of the Tribunal, as placed on record, wherein consistently Motilal Oswal Investme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

isors Pvt Ltd from the list of comparables and to recompute the adjustment to be made u/s.92C(1) of the I. T. Act. 6. With regard to exclusion of IDFC, contention of ld. AR was that it was a portfolio manager and registered with SEBI to carry out portfolio management services pursuant to the SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 1993. Our attention was invited to the Directors report of IDFC, according to which IDFC Hybrid Infrastructure Portfolio (HIP) was the first portfolio offering for dome .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version