GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 1038 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

2015 (9) TMI 1038 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT - 2016 (45) S.T.R. 329 (Jhar.) - Wrongful availment of cenvat credit - outward transportation of the goods - no error has been committed by the Commissioner(Appeals) as per Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Held that:- Reasons cannot be presumed by the Commissioner (Appeals), much less reasonable reasons for condonation of delay. There ought to be an application for condonation of delay and thereafter the reasons can be appreciated by the concerned au .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the help of the lawyers. Even otherwise also ignorentia juris non excusate. Thus, ignorance of law is not excuse. The petitioner cannot say that there ought to have been office defect pointed out by the office of Commissioner (Appeals), otherwise the petitioner will never file delay of condonation application. Every body should know the law and should have filed the delay of condonation application, if there is only delay in preferring appeal. - no reason to interfere with the order passed by t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appeal, the delay was not condoned. Against this order, the present writ petition has been preferred. 2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Commissioner (Appeals) has all powers to condone the delay of 90 days. The delay of three months can be condoned by the Commissioner (Appeals), over and above the limitation period in preferring the appeal is three months. The order in original passed by the authority under the Service Tax Act was received on 18.11.2010. The memo of appeal w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion application was given by the office of the Commissioner (Appeals) to the petitioner. These aspects of the matter have not been properly appreciated by the Commissioner (Appeals), while dismissing the appeal preferred by this petitioner vide its order dated 13.08.2012. 3. Counsel for the Union of India submitted that the petitioner is not a poor illiterate person, rather it is a company limited, and all the knowledge is being injected by the efficient lawyer, and, therefore, it is out of pla .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be condoned by the Commissioner (Appeals) and thus, no error has been committed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in dismissing the appeal for want of delay of condonation application. 4. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of this case, we see no reason to entertain this writ petition mainly for the following reasons:- (i) The Respondents carried out audit within the premises of the petitioner between 22.08.2008 to 28.08.2008, and, it was found .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version