Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

C.I.T. – ASANSOL Versus KISHORE KUMAR PAUL

2015 (9) TMI 1116 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Additional Conveyance allowance - whether is an eligible exemption under section 10(14) in view of circular no.701 dated 20.03.1995 and guideline framed by the CBDTF No.275/11/2001-IT(B) dated 1.02.2001 ? - Held that:- There is no dispute that, as evident from the notification dated 9th June, 1989, any allowance granted to meet the expenditure incurred on conveyance in the performance of duties of office or employment of profit shall qualify for deduction under section 10(14)(i) of the Act only .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nal was not justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue.

Though the CIT (A) in his order had observed that there are some judgements of the ITAT on this issue and though the Tribunal had held that the issue is covered by the orders passed by the Coordinate Benches of the Kolkata Tribunal and of various High Courts, however, but we are constrained to observe that there is no such reference in the orders passed by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal. - Decided against the assessee - .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowing the Additional Conveyance allowance as an eligible exemption under section 10(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in view of circular no.701 dated 20.03.1995 and guideline framed by the CBDTF No.275/11/2001-IT(B) dated 1.02.2001 ? Since there are typographical mistakes, the question no.2 is reformulated in the manner as under : Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be drawn that the same was incurred by the assessee on conveyance only for the promotion of new business ? In the instant case, the assessee, working as a Development Officer in the Life Insurance Corporation of India ( for short the LIC ) had received a sum of ₹ 3,74,013/- from his employer as additional conveyance allowance. In view of two certificates issued by the concerned branch of LIC, exemption was sought for under section 10(14)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Offic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

exemption for the conveyance allowance and additional conveyance allowance as per the certificate u/s 203 in Form no.16 and also an exclusive certificate given by the employers with regard to the balance additional conveyance allowance of ₹ 3,74,013/-. The ITAT s judgements in similar cases as also my own decision in a number of such cases relied upon in support of the case. I have considered the submissions made and looked into the material on record. The Assessing Officer has based the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

directed to treat both the receipts ₹ 24,564/- and ₹ 4,08,413/- as exempt u/s.10(14) of the I.T.Act. The total income would be reduced to ₹ 11,90,723/- (Rs.16,23,700/- minus ₹ 24,564/-) say, ₹ 11,90,720/-. It has to be noted that the total income is lesser than the total income returned at ₹ 12,49,490/- by the sum of ₹ 58764/- because the appellant had, inadvertently (in the computation of income) not claimed the deductions of ₹ 24,564/- (conveyan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

under : Therefore, the issue having been adjudicated and supported by a plethora of judgement the revenue s appeal is devoid of merits. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We do find that this issue has been dealt with by the ITAT, Kolkata Benefits wherein on the basis of certificate issued by the employer to the D.O. was considered as the ultimate liability to claim exemption which was produced before the Assessing Officer. The assessee was, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

igh Courts as cited on by the Ld.counsel, we have no hesitation in dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue. In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed. Md.Nizamuddin, learned advocate for the appellant, relying on the judgement of Commissioner of Income Tax v. E.A.Rajendran reported in 235 ITR 514 has submitted that since no notification has been issued by the Central Government as postulated under section 10(14)(i) exempting additional conveyance allowance to a salaried empl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version