Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (9) TMI 1123

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ITR. Audit, as per my understanding is to be as per the Guidelines prescribed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the expectation, even if any for amendment to the form of the Audit Report and /or of the form for filing the ITR is not to interfere with the commencement or completion of the audit and which can by no stretch of imagination be said to be a small task. Experience of life shows that the said audit itself takes the majority of the time, even if can be said to be prescribed of 180 days, for filing of the ITR. Once the audit is complete, in my opinion, the time admittedly available from 29th July, 2015 / 7th August, 2015 to 30th September, 2015 cannot be said to be so small / short which would qualify as unreasonable and in which the Chartered Accountants and the other practitioners of the field cannot be said to be having sufficient time to fill up the forms as per the audit already completed and to file the ITR. It is not as if the Authorities have not applied themselves to the matter. The Authorities concerned, while have extended time for filing of the ITR from the due date of 31st July to 7th September, after having brought out the Notification .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the extent of delay in number of days in notifying the prescribed Income Tax Forms under Rule 12 of the Income Tax Rules 1962 after 01.04.2015; and / or d. Issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, thereby declaring the decision of the Respondents No.1 and 2 vide its Press Release Dated 09.09.2015 as null and void and in contravention of the provisions of Part III of the Constitution of India, by virtue of which, the Respondent No.1 and 2 has not extended the date for filing of returns due by 30.09.2015 for Assessment Year 2015-2016 for certain categories of Assesses including Companies, and Firms and, Individuals Engaged in Proprietary Business / Profession etc., whose Accounts are required to be Audited in terms of the Income Tax Act 1961; and / or e. Issue Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Certiorari and / or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction for the purpose of quashing the said Press Release Dated 09.09.2015 issued by Respondent no.1 and 2; and / or f. Issue Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of mandamus and / or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, thereby directing the Respondents no.1 and 2 to extend the date of filing .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the petitioner that in exercise of power under Section 119(2), the CBDT can extend the date of 30th September as has been done in the current year also in relation to assessees not amenable to audit, the due date for whom was 31st July, 2015 but was extended to 31st August, 2015 and ultimately to 7th September, 2015. It is contended that though there was a demand for a similar extension in the case of the due date of 30th September, 2015 also but the same has not been acceded to, without giving any reasons therefor. 8. The petitioner claims to be entitled to such extension owing to the delay on the part of the respondents in prescribing the form of the return to be filed by the assessees due date wherefor is 30th September, 2015. It is contended that the said forms were prescribed only vide Notification dated 29th July, 2015 and were made available only w.e.f. 7th August, 2015. 9. The argument of the counsel for the petitioner is that since the Assessment Year 2015-2016 commenced on 1st April, 2015 and the due date for filing the return is 30th September, 2015, i.e. after 180 days of commencement of the assessment year, under the scheme of the Act, 180 days are to be made av .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... etitioner as a matter of right of 180 days for filing the ITR is admittedly not prescribed, neither in the Statute nor in the Rules. According to the counsel for the petitioner also, the same has to be deduced from the scheme of the Act. 14. I am afraid, I am unable to gauge any such scheme in the Act assuring 180 days to the assessee for filing the ITR. As already observed above, filing of ITR for assesses due date wherefor is 180 days is dependent upon the accounts of the assessee being audited and which audit the counsel for the petitioner admits commences only on the beginning of assessment year. The said audit, in the case of some assesses may be completed in a few days and in case of others may take longer. Thus, the time taken in audit, which is variable, will be determinative of the time available thereafter for filing the ITR. The said audit is not dependent upon the prescription of the forms for report of the said audit and / or for filing of the ITR. Audit, as per my understanding is to be as per the Guidelines prescribed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the expectation, even if any for amendment to the form of the Audit Report and /or of the for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... th September, 2015 for filing ITR inasmuch as interest, if any payable on the tax due would then be paid till the extended date for filing of the ITR. 19. However the test to be applied in such matters is not of seeing whether the respondents would suffer any prejudice or not, without first being satisfied of the infringement of rights of the petitioner and/or prejudice being caused to the petitioner. If no right is infringed and no prejudice is found to be caused to the petitioner, merely because no prejudice would be caused to the respondents by extending the time for filing the ITR would not be a ground for interfering with the policy decision of the Government and granting such extension. 20. Faced therewith, the counsel for the petitioner has made two other arguments. Firstly, it is contended that since the due date of 31st July was extended till 7th September, the practitioners of Income Tax remained busy till 7th September, 2015 in filing the returns of the assessees due date wherefor was 31st July and have been left with very little time for assessees due date wherefor is 30th September, 2015. Secondly, it is contended that such a representation has been made by the I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates