Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Broadway Overseas Ltd. Versus The Customs Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi And Another

2015 (9) TMI 1200 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Confiscation of goods - Imposition of redemption fine - Penalty u/s 112(a) - Contravention of licensing terms - Held that:- Tribunal had recorded that as per the provisions of the licensing notes, the secondary/defective HR Coils could be imported only at the ports of Mumbai, Chennai or Kolkatta. The import of goods at ICD, Ludhiana by the assessee was contrary to the licencing note No.4 of Chapter 72 of the ITC (HS) as there was restriction about the port at which the goods could be imported an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the appellant had violated the provisions of the licencing note. - No question of law arises - Decided against assessee. - CUSAP No. 1 of 2015 (O&M) - Dated:- 13-8-2015 - Ajay Kumar Mittal And Ramendra Jain, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr Sudhir Malhotra, Adv For the Respondent : Mr Sunish Bindlish, Adv JUDGMENT Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short "the Act") against the order dated 5.8.2014 (Annexure .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

licy read with CBEC Circular No. 12/2005 Cus dt. 04.03.2005 or regulated by provisions of licensing note 2 & 4 of ITC (HS) classification of export and import items? ii) Whether Ld. CESTAT is justified in confirming imposition of redemption fine when penalty waived? iii) Whether redemption fine imposable when issue relates to interpretation of statutory provisions? iv) Whether redemption fine can be imposed when there is no malafide on part of appellant? v) Whether the relief claimed by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

seas Distributors Inc., USA for the use in manufacture of final products in their factory premises. The assessee filed an application dated 11.10.2012 for procurement and movements of the goods without payment of duty under notification dated 31.3.2003. The Superintendent, Central Excise Range-V, Jalandhar issued certificate dated 16.10.2012 (Annexure A-2) that it was for clearance of goods through ICD/PSEC/GRFL, Ludhiana imported against invoice dated 20.8.2012 (Annexure A-1). The assessing bei .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppellant under Section 112(a) of the Act. In pursuance thereto, the appellant deposited the redemption fine and penalty vide GAR dated 24.11.2012. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) who vide order-in-appeal dated 19.3.2014 (Annexure A-4) rejected its appeal. Still dissatisfied, the appellant approached the Tribunal by way of an appeal. The Tribunal vide order dated 5.8.2014 (Annexure A-5) set aside the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) of the Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version