Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Central Excise And Service Tax Versus M/s MRF Ltd.

2015 (9) TMI 1217 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Goods Transport Agency services - contravention of Rule 3 (4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules - Held that:- The decision relied on by the Tribunal in R.R.D. Tex case (2007 (5) TMI 84 - CESTAT, CHENNAI), was also upheld by this Court in Commissioner - Vs - R.R.D. Tex Pvt. Ltd. (2013 (7) TMI 920 - MADRAS HIGH COURT). - A cursory reading of the above orders clearly reveal that the decision is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case. Following the same, the substant .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.7.10, while admitting the appeals, framed the following substantial questions of law for consideration :- "i) Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the respondents were entitled to utilise the Cenvat Credit for payment of service tax on Goods Transport Agency services received by them in view of the CBEC Circuler 345/4/2005- TRN dated 3.10.2005, particularly as the circular has not been challenged or set aside? ii) Whether the Goods Transport Agency received by the respondents c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ods and service tax paid on input services. During the period from March, 2005 to January, 2006, the assessee paid service tax of ₹ 2,52,476/- on Goods Transport Agency services received by them. The amount so paid was taken as credit as GTA service qualified as an input service. However, the Department was of the view that payment of service tax by utilising the Cenvat Credit was in contravention of Rule 3 (4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as the GTA service was not an output service. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, confirming the demand under Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and further imposed interest under Section 11AB of the Act and penalty of ₹ 15,000/- under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. 3. Aggrieved by the said order, the assessee preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), who vide order dated 29.8.07, upheld the order of the adjudicating authority. Against the said order, the assessee moved the Tribunal by filing an appeal. The Tribunal, after considering the matter a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

paid service tax of ₹ 8,14,327/- on Goods Transport Agency services received by them. The amount so paid was taken as credit as the GTA service qualified as an input service. However, the Department was of the view that payment of service tax by utilising the Cenvat Credit was in contravention of Rule 3 (4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as the GTA service was not an output service. Therefore, a show cause notice dated 10.10.2006 was issued by the Joint Commissioner, Service Tax Commis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

partment moved the Tribunal by filing an appeal. The Tribunal, after considering the matter dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee following its earlier decisions in the case of India Cements Ltd. (2007 (7) STR 569) and RRD Tex Pvt. Ltd. (2007 (8) STR 186). 6. Aggrieved over the same, the Department is before this Court by filing the present appeals. 7. Heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/Department and the learned counsel appearing for the assessee and perused the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his Court had occasion to deal with identical questions of law and answered the questions in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. For better clarity, the portion of the order is quoted hereinbelow :- "The above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed at the instance of the Revenue against Final Order Nos. 746 to 772 of 2007, dated 22-6-2007 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. The above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was admitted on the following sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

xplanation, the GTA service so received by the respondents would have been covered under the definition of "input service" under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules. By virtue of the explanation, it shall be deemed to be "output service" even after deletion of the explanation given at Rule 2(p) read with definition given at Rule 2(q) and (r) convey similar meaning". 2. The assessee herein is engaged in manufacture of yarn of different kinds. The assessee holds Service Tax R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ould be utilised only in respect of "input service" as per definition of 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Thus, utilisation of Cenvat credit for payment of Service Tax due was improper and consequently show cause notice was issued, proposing to demand Service Tax on GTA under Section 73 of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 along with interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, apart from proposing levy of penalty under Section 76 of the Act. * * * * * * * * * 10. Going by the fiction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the explanation given under "output service" in Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, thus deems that in the case of a person not proving taxable service or manufacture final products but liable for paying Service Tax, the service for which he is liable to pay Service Tax by reason Section 62(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 shall be deemed as "output service". Thus, while Rule 2(l) and 2(p) cover two classes of persons, the recipient of GTA services, by virtue of the Explanation to R .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version