Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

K. Vigneshkumar Versus The DCIT, Central Circle III, Madurai,

2015 (9) TMI 1230 - ITAT CHENNAI

Addition towards disallowance of expenses for earning the commission receipts - Held that:- The assessee has not placed necessary evidence for support of the claim. Whenever the assessee incurs any expenditure, it is the duty of the assessee to prove that expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business and also the assessee shall produce relevant evidence for the same. Since, the assessee has not produced required evidence, the lower authorities are justified in disal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ficer for fresh consideration with a direction to the assessee to file the balance sheet as on 31.03.2007 before the Assessing Officer explaining the investment and the Assessing Officer would decide the issue afresh. - Decided in favour of assessee for statistical purposes. - I.T.A. No.1313/Mds/2015 - Dated:- 2-9-2015 - SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri. V. Rajasekaran, C.A. For The Respondent : Shri. A.B. Koli, IRS, JCIT. ORDER This appeal by the assessee is dire .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0/-. (2) The Respectable Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19, Chennai was not justified while passing the order confirming addition towards investment in Spny Stones Pvt. Ltd C3,00,000/- made out of income and savings . 3. The facts of the case are that there was a search u/s.132 of the Act in the case of Shri K. Vigneshkumar, son of Shri P. Karvannan, Managing Director of M/s. Sony Fireworks Private Limited. Books of accounts, documents and other materials relating to the assessee and the g .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee had admitted Adayam income, commission and interest receipts as his income, but claimed expenses towards salaries, foreign travel expenses and others. These expenses, as per the Assessing Officer could not be attributed to have been incurred for earning the above income. As the assessee could not provide proper explanation, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment by making an addition on account of expenses claimed by the assessee towards salaries, foreign travel expenses and oth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t and hence the Assessing Officer added the same as unexplained investment to the total income of the assessee. The details of assessment order passed u/s.143(3) rws 153A are given below: Asst. Year Date of asst.order Income assessed 2005-06 06.12.2010 Rs.118850/- 2006-07 06.12.2010 Rs.130850/- 2007-08 06.12.2010 Rs.461124/- 2008-09 06.12.2010 Rs.363310/- Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). 4. Regarding first issue the Commissioner of Inco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or through a part-time employee books fireworks orders to other fireworks factories & for the purpose he goes along with the customers to other fireworks factories advise them to select varieties and bargaining them with price etc. The customers may not be regular or fixed, however, the places or the fireworks factories at Sivakasi would certainly be known to the assessee as the assessee himself belongs to a family owning a big brand fireworks factories under the brand name of 'Sony fir .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ions cannot be accepted as there is no detail or evidence brought on record by the assessee to show that the income has been earned by the assessee by carrying on the business the assessee claimed to have been doing. It is also pertinent to mention here that originally, before the search i.e., 21.10.2008, the assessee had not file any return of income for any of the assessment years under appeal, though the same were due before the date of search. No evidence with regard to actual incurring of e .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

including foreign travel expenses. No bills or vouchers, with regard to any expenditure has been brought on record by the assessee even during the course of appeal proceedings. It was a settled law that for making a claim of expenditure to be allowable as business expenditure under section 37 of the Act, the onus is on the claimant assessee to prove that the expenditure had been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of its business. It is considered relevant to reproduce-the extracts o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ess of the assessee. The assessee therefore, has failed to discharge the onus cast on it by law. Therefore the claim of assessee with regard to the aforesaid expenses debited towards salaries, foreign travel & others etc., cannot be allowed. Accordingly, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the order of the Assessing Officer. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. Heard both parties and perused the material on record. The assessee has not placed necessary evidence f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version