Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (9) TMI 1290 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (9) TMI 1290 - ITAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Levy of fees under section 234E - intimation issued under section 200A in respect of processing of TDS for the Assessment Year 2013-14 - Held that:- The issue in appeal is now squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of ITAT Amritsar Bench in the case of Sibia Healthcare Private Limited vs. DCIT [2015 (6) TMI 437 - ITAT AMRITSAR]. No dispute that the provisions accepting levy of late filing fees under section 234E have indeed been brou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e appellant has challenged correctness of the order dated 30th October,, 2014 passed by the ld. CIT(A) upholding levy of fees, under section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( the Act hereinafter), on the assessee and by way of intimation issued under section 200A in respect of processing of TDS for the Assessment Year 2013-14, Q2. 2. Although as many as nine intimations passed by the Assessing Officer under section 200A of the Act for the assessment year 2013-14 & 2014-15 are attached with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ourse of processing TDS return under section 200A of the Act. 4. I have heard the rival contentions, perused the material on record and duly considered the facts of the case in the light of the applicable legal position. 5. I find that the issue in appeal is now squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of ITAT Amritsar Bench in the case of Sibia Healthcare Private Limited vs. DCIT - ITA No.90/Asr/2015, vide order dated 9th June, 2015, wherein the Division Bench has inter alia o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hya Bizor P Solutions Vs Union of India [WP No. 6918-6938/2014(T-IT), Hon ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Om Prakash Dhoot Vs Union of India [WP No. 1981 of 2014] and of Hon ble Bombay High Court in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia Vs Union of India [WP No. 771 of 2014], granting stay on the demands raised in respect of fees under section 234E. The full text of these decisions were not produced before us. However, as admittedly there are no orders from the Hon ble Courts above retraining .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ishing statements (1) Without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, where a person fails to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 206C, he shall be liable to pay, by way of fee, a sum of two hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues. (2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case may be, on or after the 1st day of July, 2012. 6. We may also reproduce the Section 200A which was inserted by the Finance Act 2009 with effect from 1st April 2010. This statutory provision, as it stood at the relevant point of time, was as follows: 200A: Processing of statements of tax deducted at source (1) Where a statement of tax deduction at source, or a correction statement, has been made by a person deducting any sum (hereafter referred to in this section as deductor) under section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed after adjustment of amount computed under clause (b) against any amount paid under section 200 and section 201, and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest; (d) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause (c); and (e) the amount of refund due to the deductor in pursuance of the determination under clause (c) shall be granted to the deductor: Provided that no i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

where such rate is not in accordance with the provisions of this Act; (2) For the purposes of processing of statements under sub-section (1), the Board may make a scheme for centralised processing of statements of tax deducted at source to expeditiously determine the tax payable by, or the refund due to, the deductor as required under the said subsection. 7. By way of Finance Act 2015, and with effect from 1st June 2015, there is an amendment in Section 200A and this amendment, as stated in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

200 or section 201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause (d); and (f) the amount of refund due to the deductor in pursuance of the determination under clause (d) shall be granted to the deductor. 8. In effect thus, post 1st June 2015, in the course of processing of a TDS statement and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ees under section 234E. While examining the correctness of the intimation under section 200A, we have to be guided by the limited mandate of Section 200A, which, at the relevant point of time, permitted computation of amount recoverable from, or payable to, the tax deductor after making the following adjustments: (a). after making adjustment on account of arithmetical errors and incorrect claims apparent from any information in the statement - Section 200A(1)(a) (b). after making adjustment for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

intimation is an appealable order under section 246A(a), and, therefore, the CIT(A) ought to have examined legality of the adjustment made under this intimation in the light of the scope of the section 200A. Learned CIT(A) has not done so. He has justified the levy of fees on the basis of the provisions of Section 234E. That is not the issue here. The issue is whether such a levy could be effected in the course of intimation under section 200A. The answer is clearly in negative. No other provisi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version