Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Cricket Club of India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai

2015 (9) TMI 1389 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - cum-tax computation - deposit of tax which was not leviable - Service tax was paid as Clubs or associations service on amounts collected as entrance fee for admission of new members - Held that:- Mere capacity to deliver a service cannot be equated with providing or agreeing to provide a service; such service has to reach the recipient in exchange for the consideration or the consideration is made over in exchange for a schedule of delivery of the service. In a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

common expenses of a group of persons aggregating for identified common objectives will not meet the criteria of taxation under Finance Act, 1994 in the absence of identifiable service that benefits an identified individual or individuals who make the contribution in return for the benefit so derived.

Tax was paid on the entrance fee without collecting the tax amount from the new members. Though the first appellate authority has granted the benefit of a cum-tax computation of the entr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

x burden has not been transferred to the members from whom entrance fees were collected. Clearly, the service tax so paid does not carry the taint of unjust enrichment. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Appeal No. ST/20/2009 - Final Order No. A/3117/2015-WZB/STB - Dated:- 21-9-2015 - S. S. Garg, Member (J) And C J Mathew, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri Vipin Kumar Jain & Shri Rashil Nichani, Advs For the Respondent : Shri K S Mishra, Additional Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per C J Mathew Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ring of "club or association service" under section 65 (105) (zzze) of Finance Act, 1994 with effect from 16 th June, 2005. Refund of this amount was sought in application dated 7 th June 2006 claiming that the entrance fee was not liable to tax. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Division II, Service Tax Commissionerate, Mumbai rejected the claim vide order-in-original no. AKS/R02/2008 dated 18 th January 2008 and the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone -I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

governed by the provisions of section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 and now under section 8 of Companies Act, 2013. For this reason it is claimed to be a members club as opposed to the other category of clubs, viz., proprietory clubs. While both accord facilities to its members, the former are run by the members themselves through appropriate management bodies and the latter by promoters in the business of running clubs. Statutorily, in the event of winding-up, the assets of the appellant devolv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ansactions between the former and the latter was held to be beyond the scope of taxation. The decision of the Tribunal in Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust v Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai - I [2007(5) STR 146 (Tri-Mumbai)] which relied upon the principle of mutuality as applied to clubs by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chelmsford Club vs Commissioner of Income Tax [2000 (243) ITR 89 (SC)], Commissiner of Income Tax v Bankipur Club Ltd. [1997 (22G) HR 97 (SC)], that of Hon'ble High .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vy of service tax as held by the Tribunal in Cochin International Airport v. Commissioner of Central Excise Kochi [ 2007 (7) STR 486 (Tri-Bang) and Euro RSCG Advertising Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax Bangalore [2007 (7) STR 277 (Tri-Bang]. Anticipating the resort to "unjust enrichment' for denying the refund claim, the appellant also intimated the lower authorities that no amount over and above the stipulated entrance fee had been collected and that the amount remitted as tax, und .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

es was tantamount to advance payment for facilities of the club and that the charging section relating to taxation of "clubs or associations" was extendable beyond subscriptions to include any other amounts collected from members. The same were reiterated in the proceedings before the first appellate authority who has, however, endorsed the findings of the Assistant Commissioner. 4. Ever since "clubs or associations" were brought under the ambit of section 65 (105) (zzze) of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er countries with similarly strong traditions of jurisprudence. That such disputes have arisen, and that they attracted juristic attention, is not surprising considering that clubs and clubbing have been culturally ingrained in human life across space and time. Fulfilling as it does the basic human need for socializing, any curbs or restrictions cast on these by tax officials, in particular, have been resisted with fervour by recourse to judicial intervention. All these disputes have arisen beca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h Court of Jharkhand in Ranchi Club Ltd v Chief Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax [2012 (26) STR 401 (Jhar)] has drawn a distinction between members' clubs and proprietary clubs while holding that, in accordance with the principle of mutuality, the two entities required to complete a taxable transcation are not in existence in relation to the former. Referring to this decision, Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat has, in Sports Club of Gujarat v Union of India - Special Civil Ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is not only not a service but does not, of itself, assure any other facility without further payment. This is a fundamental issue raised on behalf of the appellant that goes beyond the principle of mutuality. 6. The contention of the appellant in this case is that they were made to deposit a tax which is not leviable. According to them, the amount collected as entrance fee was not a consideration for rendering of any service and, even if deemed to be a consideration, it is not taxable being a t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oner of Service Tax [2007 (7) STR 235 (Tri-Del)] and Dehradun Club Ltd v Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I [2007 (7) STR 519 (Tri-Del)] all of which uniformly relied on the principle of mutuality to set aside the taxes demanded and that these arguments and the judicial pronouncements did not appear to find favour at the adjudication and first appellate stages despite the ruling of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Commissioner of Income Tax v Smt Godavaridevi Saraf, Tumsar [1978 (2) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rely to the appellant as a members' club and the ruling of the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat would settle the case in favour of the appellant. Nevertheless, the fundamental question raised by the appellant calls for a response from this Tribunal for two reasons; firstly, the pendency of the appeals before the Hon'ble Supreme Court is likely to be construed as sufficient cause for continuing to not only demand service tax on clubs and associations but also to adjudicate thereon withou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

exists only in a limited sphere in the context of the general supposition that legislation will not ever stray beyond the bounds of constitutionality (Principles of Statutory Interpretation - Justice GP Singh pp 44-45, Thirteenth Edition 2012) and is derived from that supposition. This does not, however, rule out the possibility of the tax administrator assuming a jurisdiction beyond legislative intent; all too often, this is the outcome of ignorance of or the assumption that the statute admini .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re, cannot and should not be read beyond the transaction that is intended to be taxed. Plainly expressed, only services can be taxed. Habituated to tax on tangible goods, the concept of tax on services may not be easily appreciated for the very reason of its intangibility. The form of the transaction not being apparent until its benefit is perceived in the hands of the recipient and signified by readiness to recompense the provider, the tendency to seize upon the tangibility of the flow of compe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial ingredient of all economic transactions and it is certainly consideration that forms the basis for computation of service tax. However, existence of consideration cannot be presumed in every money flow. Without an identified recipient who compensates the identified provider with appropriate consideration, a service cannot be held to have been provided. In a taxation scheme that specifies the particular targets of taxation, tax liability will arise when a provider conforming to the relevant d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

negative list too; a service that is clearly identifiable has to be provided or agreed to be provided before it can be taxed. The factual matrix of the existence of a monetary flow combined with convergence of two entities for such flow cannot be moulded by tax authorities into a taxable event without identifying the specific activity that links the provider to the recipient. 12. For that very reason, mere capacity to deliver a service cannot be equated with providing or agreeing to provide a s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ision of a service can be established, the question of taxing an attendant monetary transactions will not arise. Contributions for the discharge of liabilities or for meeting common expenses of a group of persons aggregating for identified common objectives will not meet the criteria of taxation under Finance Act, 1994 in the absence of identifiable service that benefits an identified individual or individuals who make the contribution in return for the benefit so derived. 13. The activities of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndividuals that is not attributable to an identifiable activity be deemed to be a consideration that is liable to be taxed merely because a "cub or association" is the recipient of that contribution. The definition of "taxable service" in section 65 (105), in relation to every appurtenant thereto is preceded by the phrase "services provided or to be provided" which when read, in the context of the appellant, at (zzze) i.e. "to its members, or any other person, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e by members to a "club or association" does not, ipso facto, become taxable. 14. "Clubs or associations" generally charge entrance fees as well as periodical subscriptions. They may and, often do, provide facilities for recreational, social and victualling requirements of its members. Such facilities may or may not entail an identifiable charge but, most often, do - certainly they do so for the latter two facilities. To the extent that any of these collections are directly a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ance fee is a one-time payment that is visited upon members of "clubs or association". It affords their inclusion into the restricted group that constitutes membership of the club or association. Such entrance fees do not usually confer access to services, facilities or advantages for which membership of the club or association is keenly sought. Membership is contingent upon tendering prescribed subscription at prescribed intervals. Therefore, a provision of service is not perceptible .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

share of the value of the asset would devolve on members should the establishment be wound up. Being the present value of a future distribution of sale proceeds and bringing naught other than acknowledgement as a member of the club or association, it is not attributable to a service rendered by the appellant. This contention is convincing in the absence of an alternative explanation for the charging of entrance fee and we, therefore, conclude the service tax is not leviable on such entrance fees .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version