GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 156 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

2015 (10) TMI 156 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - 2016 (343) E.L.T. 579 (Tri. - Del.) - Classification of goods - Classification under sub-heading 1704.90 or under sub-heading 1704.10 - Held that:- On the identical facts the Department had initiated proceedings against Chennai Unit and the Commissioner vide Order in original No.8/09 dated 31.03.2009 have confirmed duty demand of ₹ 5,47,94,432/-against Chennai Unit in respect of clearances of mentos mint, and six other products of similar nature durin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lso be time barred. - Goods covered under sub-heading 1704.10 would be those where it is the gum which gives them essential character and in-fact in terms of the Provisions of Food Adulteration Rules 1955 (para A/25.02.01) the bubblegums and chewing gums must contain not less than 12.5% to 14% of gums. The product, in question, contains contains 97% of sugar and glucose, about 2% fats and colours and flavours and about 1% or less of gum arabic which is used as stabilizer and emulsifier, and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ranted. - Excise Misc. Application No. E/M/50396/2015, Excise Appeal No. E/306/2010-EX(DB) - MISC. ORDER NO. 50936/2015 - Dated:- 2-3-2015 - Rakesh Kumar, Member (T) And S K Mohanty, Member (J),JJ. For the Appellant : Shri K Anand, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri Pramod Kumar, JCDR ORDER Per: Rakesh Kumar: Appellant are manufacturers of sugar confectionaries falling under Chapter 17 of the Central Excise Tariff. One of the products being manufactured by them is mentos mint which is the subject ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ufacture under section 2f(iii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The dispute in this present case is about classification of the product. According to the appellant the goods manufactured by them are "other sugar confectionary" classifiable under sub-heading 1704.90 of the Tariff, while according to the Department, the goods are classifiable as "Chewing Gums" under sub-heading 1704.10. In this regard, there is no dispute that the mentos mint manufactured by the appellant conta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eals) by the impugned order dated 12.11.2009 has upheld the confirmation of the duty demand of ₹ 26,25,516/- for the period from April 2003 to February, 2005, the show cause notice for which had been issued on 30.04.2008, Against this order of the Commissioner (Appeals), this appeal has been filed alongwith stay application. 2. Heard both the sides. 3. Shri K.Anand, Advocate, the ld. Counsel for the appellant, pleaded that the proceedings against Gurgaon Unit had been preceded by the proce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sition of the product was known to the Department as the appellant had earlier been filing classification declarations giving the composition of the product, that in view of this, the present appeal would also not survive on the ground of limitation, that in any case, the appellant have strong prima-facie case on merit as while the product, in question, contains less than 1 % of Gum Arabic and the purpose of gum Arabic is to prevent crystallization of sugar and uniform distribution of fat, while .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

abic in less than 1% and the same does not provide the product's essential character and its function is only to prevent crystallization of sugar and maintaining uniform distribution of fat, that in view of this, the impugned order is not correct either on limitation or on merits and the appellants have strong primaface case in their favour and, hence, the requirement of pre-deposit of duty demand, interest and penalty may be waived for hearing of the appeal and the recovery thereof may be s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version