TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 518X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unt - Revenue held the amount as directed by the Tribunal was reasonable and justified - Held That:- Ends of justice would be met if the Tribunal is directed to hear the appeal on merits without insisting for any further deposit – Stay granted. - STA No. 23 of 2014 (O&M) - - - Dated:- 27-8-2015 - MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND MR. RAMENDRA JAIN., JJ For The Appellant : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ice tax. The respondent sought information from the appellant regarding their receipts from space sold/allotted for advertisement. The appellant supplied details of receipts and on that basis, the respondent formed an opinion that the appellant was liable to pay service tax. Accordingly, the respondent issued a show cause notice dated 17.8.2010 to the appellant for recovery of ₹ 1,71,46,656/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the appellant submitted that the requirement of ₹ 1,71,46,656/- as pre-deposit as a condition precedent for hearing of appeal was unfair and excessive. He, however, submitted that the appellant has deposited a sum of ₹ 68,58,662/-, i.e. 40% of the service tax in terms of order dated 18.2.2015 passed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue opposed the prayer made by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
