Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 593 - ITAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (10) TMI 593 - ITAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Eligibility of deduction u/s. 80P - Held that:- Revenue has not placed any material on record to demonstrate that Assessee is a Co-Op. Bank and is not a Credit Co-op. Society nor has placed any contrary binding decision in its support. Assessee is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P - Decided in favour of assessee. - I.T. A. No. 1108/AHD/2011 - Dated:- 28-8-2015 - SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JJ. For The Appellant : Shri T.P. Hemani, A.R. For T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rs. Nil. The case was selected for scrutiny and thereafter the assessment was framed under section 143(3) vide order dated 24.12.2009 and the total income was determined at ₹ 5,35,780/-. Aggrieved by the order of A.O., Assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) who vide order dated 09.12.2010 dismissed the appeal of the Assessee. Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(A), Assessee is now in appeal before us and has raised the following grounds:- 1. The Ld. CIT(A) has grossly erred in law an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd therefore the Appellant is eligible to claim deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. 4. Both the lower authorities have erred in law and on facts in passing the orders without properly appreciating the fact and that he further erred in grossly ignoring various submissions, explanations and information submitted by the appellant from time to time which ought to have been considered before passing the impugned order. This action of both the authorities is in clear breach of law and Principles of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t. 5. During the course of assessment proceedings and on the basis of scrutiny of the accounts, A.O concluded that since the Assessee was carrying out business of banking it was not eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2) of the Act in view of the amendment made to sub-section 4 in Section 80P with effect from 01.04.2007 as he was of the view that after the amendment the benefit of Section 80P was restricted only to Primary Agricultural Credit Society and Primary Co-op. Agricultural and Rural Develop .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

case would be entitled to deduction u/s,80P, It is only seen that Shri Sobhan Kar, Under Secretary has written that "if the Delhi Co.Op.Urhan T &, C Society Ltd. does not fall within the meaning of "Cooperative Bank" as defined in part V of the Banking Regulation Act,1949, Sub-Section) of section 80P will not apply in its case " Thus the CBDT was not given any direction as to the fact whether deduction u/s. 80Pshall be available to the assessee. It is seen that as per de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

co-operative land mortgage bank: (cciia) 'co-operative society means a society registered or deemed to have been registered under any Central Act for the time being in force relating to the multi state co-operative societies for the time being in force," 4.3(i) In view of the above definition, it is clear that the appellant comes under the definition of Co-operative Bank. Hence, section 80P(4) is clearly applicable to the appellant. In view of the above, the action of the AO in denying .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Jafri Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. (2014) 362 ITR 331 (Guj). He therefore submitted that Assessee be granted deduction u/s. 80P. The ld. D.R. on the other hand supported the order of A.O and ld. CIT(A). 8. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The issue in the present case is with respect to allowability of deduction u/s. 80P. The Assessee was denied the deduction for the reason that it was held that Assessee being a co-operative bank and by virtue of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a Member, in the case of Kanodar Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. (ITA No. 647/Ahd/2011). We find that in that case also the ld. CIT(A) for exactly same reasons had denied the claim of deduction to Assessee. We find that in that case the issue was decided in favour of the Assessee by the Tribunal holding as under:- 6.Before us, at the outset the ld. A.R. submitted that the issue in the present case is directly covered by the decision of Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surat Vankar Sa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orted the order of A.O and ld. CIT(A). 7. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. We find that ld. CIT(A) upheld the order of A.O after considering the definition of Co- Op. Bank mentioned in clause (cci) of Section 56(5) of part-V of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. We however find that the Hon ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT vs. Surat Vankar Sahakari Sangh Ltd. (supra). after considering the clarification issued by CBDT vide Circular No. 133 of 2007 dated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssing Officer held that by virtue of section 80P(4), the respondent assessee would not be entitled to benefits of deduction under section 80P. CIT(Appeals) as well as the Tribunal reversed the decision of the Assessing Officer on the premise that the respondent assessee not being a bank, exclusion provided in sub-section(4) of section 80P would not apply. This, irrespective of the fact that the respondent would not fall within the expression primary agricultural credit society. 6. Had this been .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

exclusion from such exclusion and in other words, continued to hold such entity as eligible for deduction. However, the issue has been considerably simplified by virtue of CBDT circular No. 133 of 2007 dated 9.5.2007. Circular provides as under:- Subject: Clarification regarding admissibly of deduction under section 80P of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. 1. Please refer to your letter no. DCUS/30688/2007, dated 28.03.2007 addressed to Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, on the above given subjec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ank means a State Co-operative bank, a Central Co-operative Bank and a primary Co-operative bank. 4. Thus, if the Delhi Co op Urban T & C Society Ltd. does not fall within the meaning of Co-operative Bank as defined in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, sub-section(4) of section 80P will not apply in this case. 5. The issues with the approval of Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes. 7. From the above clarification, it can be gathered that sub-section(4) of section 80P will not ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version