Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Ravi Agarwal Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-II, Bareilly

2015 (10) TMI 755 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - as per revenue alleged loan taken by the appellant was a deemed dividend and, therefore an income from other sources - Whether the loan/advance given by the Finance Company to the assessee, who is a share holder in the Finance Company was made in the ordinary course of its business, hence outside the scope of Section 2(22)(e)? - Held that:- It is not possible to give a fixed definition of the word "substantial" in relation to a substantial business of a Company. We .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

>
We find from a perusal of the order of the Tribunal that Sarnath Finance Co. is admittedly engaged in the business of loans and advances, as is clear from the memorandum of association. The Tribunal picks holes from the balance sheet of the Sarnath Finance Co. contending that under the heading "Loans and Advances" the Company had made sub groups, namely, "Loans and Advances" and "stocks on hire including hire purchase". The Tribunal, therefore, concluded that a substantial part of the bus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s main business.

We are of the view that the Tribunal and the authorities below committed a manifest error in holding that the loan and advance given by the Sarnath Finance Company to the appellant was a deemed dividend. In fact, it was covered by the exclusionary clause (ii) of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee. - Income Tax Appeal No. 224 of 2015 - Dated:- 8-10-2015 - Hon'ble Tarun Agarwala And Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani, JJ. ORDER (Per: Tarun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as the "Act"). The assessing authority, after considering the explanation held, that the alleged loan taken by the appellant was a deemed dividend and, therefore an income from other sources. The assessing authority held that the Finance Company, namely, Sarnath Finance Limited was mainly engaged in advancing hire purchase of transport vehicle and that the said Finance Company had only made 10.79% investment in loans and advances which cannot be termed as a substantial part of business .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

014, in which it was held that the Tribunal had not considered the nature of the transaction of the Company before determining as to whether the exclusionary clause (ii) of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act was attracted or not and, accordingly, remanded the matter to the Tribunal for a decision afresh. The Tribunal thereafter decided the matter and again rejected the appeal of the assessee holding that the alleged loan given by the Sarnath Finance Ltd. to the assessee was in the ordinary course of bu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

showed ₹ 426.32 lacs under the heading stocks on hire and ₹ 56.23 lacs under the heading "loans and advances" and, therefore, concluded that a substantial business of the Finance Company was for hire purchase transactions and not for "loans and advances" and, therefore, the loan taken by the appellant was not covered under the exclusionary clause (ii) of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. 4. In this back drop, we have heard Sri Abhinav Mehrotra, the learned counsel for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

consider the provision of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. "2(22) "dividend" includes- (a) ....... (e) any payment by a company, not being a company in which the public are substantially interested, of any sum (whether as representing a part of the assets of the company or otherwise) [made after the 31st day of May, 1987, by way of advance or loan to a shareholder, being a person who is the beneficial owner of shares (not being shares entitled to a fixed rate of dividend whether with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(i) ........ (ii) any advance or loan made to a shareholder or the said concern by a company in the ordinary course of its business, where the lending of money is a substantial part of the business of the company ; 7. The necessary ingredients as contemplated under Section 2(22)(e) of the Act are not disputed by the Department and the admitted fact is, that the appellant is a share holder of 15% in Sarnath Finance Ltd. who gave a loan. This Finance Company as per the memorandum and articles of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

efore, the said loan could not be treated as a deemed dividend in view of the provision of sub Section (ii) of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. On the other hand, the Department has urged that lending of money was not a substantial part of the business of the Company and that the substantial part was hire purchase transaction, hence the lending of money was not in its ordinary course of business and the same was, therefore, not covered by the exclusionary clause (ii) of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ubstantial part of the business" has not been defined under the Act. 9. The Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax, Panaji, Goa vs. Parle Plastics Ltd., 2011 (196) Taxman 62 explained as to what would constitute a "substantial part of the business". The Bombay High Court after considering the meaning of the word "substantial" in various dictionaries concluded:- "11. The expression used under clause (ii) of Section 2(22) is substantial part of the business&# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

yan Court) is given in support of this meaning. In the meaning No.8, while considering 'substantial amount', it is stated that out of a rent of £80 p.a.., £13 p.a. attributable to the amount paid for furniture, was a substantial amount, on the basis of the decision in Maclay v. Dixon 170 L.T. 49. In meaning No.15, relying upon the decision of Ladbrooke (Football) v. William Hill (Football) [1964] 1 W.L.R. 273, it is said that in deciding whether the reproduced part of copyrig .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

before us wherein a view has been taken that in order to show that a part of the whole to be treated as "substantial part", the part must exceed 50% of the whole. In our view, the expression "substantial part" does not connote an idea of being the "major part" or the part that constitutes majority of the whole. If the legislature really intended that more than 50% of the business of the lending company must come from the business of lending, nothing prevented the le .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e business or profit to be coming from the lending business of the lending company for the purpose of clause (ii) of Section 2(22) of the Act. We would give an illustration to ascertain the meaning of the expression "substantial business" or "substantial income" of a company. In the modern days, large number of companies do not restrict to one or two businesses. They carry on numerous activities and carry on numerous businesses and have numerous business divisions. Let us tak .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

esses of the said company is a substantial business of the company. In our view not. The first business which constitutes 40% of the turn over and contributes 40% to the profit would be the single largest part of the business of the company, the second and third divisions of the business, each of which contributes 30% of the turn over as well as profit of the company, though not the major and not even single largest part of the business of the company, would still be a substantial part of the bu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he company does not regard as small, trivial, or inconsequential as compared to the whole of the business is substantial business. Various factors and circumstances would be required to be looked into while considering whether a part of the business of a company is its substantial business. Sometimes a portion which contributes substantial part of the turn over, though it contributes a relatively small portion of the profit, would be substantial part of the business. Similarly, a portion which r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a company are now called its "human resources" and, therefore, the percentage of "human resources" used by the company for carrying on a particular division of business may also be required to be taken into consideration while considering whether a particular business forms substantial part of its business. Undisputedly, the capital employed by a company for carrying on a particular division of its business as compared to the total capital employed by it would also be releva .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version