Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (1) , Jaipur Versus M/s. S.S. Timber Plywood, Nahargarh Road, Jaipur.

Unexplained cash credits - addition u/s 69 - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- CIT (A) only considered the confirmation along with the PAN numbers and held that the assessee’s burden had been discharged by relying on various decisions. Recently various High Courts including Hon’ble Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs. Youth Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2012 (11) TMI 595 - DELHI HIGH COURT) has held that the assessee has to establish the creditworthiness of the cash creditors. The Hon’ble Supre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

side the order of ld. CIT (A) to the AO. The assessee is directed to cooperate with the AO and furnish the requisite details. - Decided in favour of revenue for statistical purposes..

Trading addition - assessee did not produce the books of account - CIT(A) deleted the addition on the ground that the GP rate shown during the year under consideration is better in comparison to preceding year and no addition is warranted - Held that:- Even the justification given by the assessee is not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

account from the Excise Authorities to verify the correctness and completeness of the books of account and take decision on this issue. Thus this issue is also set aside for denovo order. - Decided in favour of revenue for statistical purposes.. - ITA No. 592/JP/2012 - Dated:- 7-9-2015 - SHRI R.P. TOLANI, JM & SHRI T.R. MEENA, AM For The Revenue : SHRI Kailash Mangal (JCIT) For The Assessee : Shri Anil Sharma, C.A. & Shri Arpit Vijay, C.A. ORDER PER SHRI T.R. MEENA, A.M. This is an appea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nor during the course of remand proceedings, these alleged cash creditors appeared before the AO in response to the summons issued by her for verification of these credits. 2) Deleting trading addition of ₹ 11,24,838/- made by the AO on the ground of declaring better g.p. rate in comparison to earlier years ignoring the fact that the assessee produced books of accounts neither before the AO during assessment proceedings nor before the CIT (A) during appellate proceedings. 2. First ground o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rove the genuineness of the credit, creditworthiness of the creditor and identity of the person vide various questionnaire issued to the assessee, and also asked to produce the confirmation from these creditors of unsecured loans of ₹ 1,97,53,075/-. The assessee did not furnish any information regarding the cash creditors. The assessee also had taken bogus entries similar to one of ₹ 1,50,000/- received by it from Shri Raj Kumar. Therefore, he made addition of ₹ 65,46,817/- as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

had also appeared before the AO and confirmed having given the loan to appellant. All the cash creditors were also assessed to tax and also submitted copies of their bank statement. In the case of Smt. Suman Goyal, the bank statement could not be submitted. However, she was assessed to tax and her PAN was stated to be AAZPG 5755 F. Similarly in the cases of Smt. Rachana Bhagrai, Shri Tara Chand Goyal and Shree Ram Tent House, copies of bank statements could not be submitted though they were asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The ld. Counsel of the appellant was provided copy of remand report. In response, the appellant vide its letter dated 21.3.2012 had argued that the AO vide his remand report dated 15.03.2012 held that the unsecured loans of ₹ 21,31,836/- received from 19 persons were not verifiable. The AO had simply concluded the above finding for the reason that about 19 creditors had not responded to the summons issued u/s 131 of the IT Act. However, the appellant had given complete details in respect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ved the identity of the creditors, their capacity and genuineness of the transactions, and thus discharged the primary burden lying under section 68 of the IT Act. The relevant amount had been received through account payee cheques as detailed in respective confirmation letters and the summons issued by the AO had been duly served at the given addresses except 5 creditors. The AO had not contradicted any of the evidences submitted by the appellant nor given any finding in respect of the non-genu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd held that the AO was not justified in holding that the unsecured loans of ₹ 21,31,836/- may be treated as non genuine. He further observed that he made enquiries from the computer center and verified the PANs in number of cases which has been narrated in his order on page 10. In case of non compliance of summons issued under section 131, after verification of PANs, he held that appellant had satisfactorily explained the identity, creditworthiness of the creditor and genuineness of the t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e had not produced the books of account and no confirmation of cash creditors were submitted during the assessment proceedings. However, these were submitted at the appellate stage which had also remanded to the AO. But in case of 19 cash creditors, AO has categorically assigned the reasons that cash credits to the tune of ₹ 21,31,836/- were not genuine. In case of 5 cash creditors, summons were not served or returned unserved by the postal authorities and in case of 14 persons, replies fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rwarded the same to the AO with specific direction to make detailed enquiry and to submit report in respect of the same. The AO vide her remand report dated 16.3.2012 had held that the unsecured loans of ₹ 21,31,836/- received from 19 persons had been remained not verifiable and the same may please be treated as non-genuine. The AO had concluded that the finding given simply for the reason that the relevant 19 creditors had not responded to the summons issued under section 131 of the IT Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nce of the summons issued by the AO, on the part of the creditors, and the relevant loans cannot be held as non genuine simply for the reason that the creditors had not complied with the summons issued by the AO. He further relied on the decisions in cases of CIT vs. Orissa Corporation Pvt. Ltd. (supra), CIT vs. Shree Barkha Synthetics Ltd. 270 ITR 477, DCIT vs. Rohini Builders (supra), Sreelekha Banerjee vs. CIT, 49 ITR 112 (SC), S. Hastmal vs. CIT, 49 ITR 273 (Mad.). Therefore, he requested th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of account that there was a fire in the shop and claimed that books had been destroyed in fire. Therefore, assessee made contradictory submissions before the AO. The ld. CIT (A) had not given any finding on the regular books of account. There was a search and seizure operation under section 132(1) of the IT Act on 12.04.2005 in case of M/s. B.C. Purohit & Co. and Shri Kripa Shankar Sharma, one of the associates of M/s. B.C. Puirohit & Co. in Jaipur. These persons were engaged in providi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as not been shifted on revenue in case of 5 cash creditors. In case of 14 cash creditors, assessee also filed confirmation but there was no reply before the AO. The ld. CIT (A) only considered the confirmation along with the PAN numbers and held that the assessee s burden had been discharged by relying on various decisions. Recently various High Courts including Hon ble Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs. Youth Construction Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 357 ITR 197 has held that the assessee has to establish .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the transaction and identity of the persons only. The third ingredient to prove the cash creditors under section 68 i.e. creditworthiness has to be established. Therefore, we set aside the order of ld. CIT (A) to the AO. The assessee is directed to cooperate with the AO and furnish the requisite details. 7. Second ground in revenue s appeal is against deleting the trading addition of ₹ 11,24,838/- by ld. CIT (A). As discussed above, the assessee did not produce the books of account. In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: import purchase

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version