TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 941X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assessee as a part of its objects wanted to lend, the only available choice for assessee, in order not to keep the funds idle, was to place it in banks for earning interest. As relying on case of CIT v. Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd [2015 (2) TMI 995 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ] it is held the money meant for lending, remaining surplus, there being no takers, if deposited in banks for earning interest, such interest income would be attributable to the business of banking carried out by the assessee. Natural corollary is that Section 80P(4) of the Act is not attracted unless the cooperative society is recognised by RBI as a cooperative bank as per the rules made under Reserve Bank of India Act. We, therefore, hold that ass ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d. DR strongly assailing the order of CIT (A) submitted that assessee fell within the limitation specified in Section 80P(4) of the Act. According to the Ld. DR AO had made a detailed study of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949, and came to a conclusion that assessee was hit by definition of 'business of banking' as per Reserve Bank Regulations. 5. Per contra, Ld. AR supported the order of CIT (A). 6. We have perused the orders and heard the rival contentions. There is no dispute that one of the main object of assessee society was providing credit facility to its members. AO himself has mentioned that this was the primary object for which assessee was incorporated. No doubt, out of substantial sum received as deposits from the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... port of his contentions, he relied on several judgments and pointed out that the Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment has not laid down any law. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the Revenue strongly relied on the said judgment of the Supreme Court and submitted, the case is covered by that judgment of the Apex Court and no case for interference is made out. 6. From the aforesaid facts and rival contentions, the undisputed facts which emerges is, the sum of ₹ 1,77,305/- represents the interest earned from short-term deposits and from savings bank account. The assessee is a Cooperative Society providing credit facilities to its members. It is not carrying on any other business. The interest income earned by the assessee by p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ONER OF INCOME-TAX, GUJARAT-II reported in ITR VOL. 113 (1978) PAGE 842 at page 93 as under: As regards the aspect emerging from the expression attributable to occurring in the phrase profits and gains attributable to the business of the specified industry here generation and distribution of electricity on which the learned Solicitor-General relied, it will be pertinent to observe that the legislature has deliberately used the expression attributable to and not the expression derived from . It cannot be disputed that the expression attributable to is certainly wider in import than the expression derived from . Had the expression derived from been used, it could have with some force been contended that a balancing charge ari ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is attributable to the profits and gains of the business of providing credit facilities to its members only. The society is not carrying on any separate business for earning such interest income. The income so derived is the amount of profits and gains of business attributable to the activity of carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members by a co-operative society and is liable to be deducted from the gross total income under Section 80P of the Act. 9. In this context when we look at the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of M/s. Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd., on which reliance is placed, the Supreme Court was dealing with a case where the Society, apart from providing credit facilitie ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g on the business of banking and therefore it is liable to be deducted in terms of Section 80P(1) of the Act. In fact similar view is taken by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX III, HYDERABAD vs. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD., reported in (2011) 200 TAXMAN 220/12. In that view of the matter, the order passed by the appellate authorities denying the benefit of deduction of the aforesaid amount is unsustainable in law. Accordingly it is hereby set aside. The substantial question of law is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Hence, we pass the following order. Appeal is allowed. 9. We are of the opinion that in view of the judgement of Hon'ble jurisdictiona ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
