Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 964 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (10) TMI 964 - CESTAT MUMBAI - TMI - Denial of SSi Exemption - Benefit of Notification 175/86 - Use of other's brand name - Held that:- Even though M/s. VPL has taken the provisional SSI certificate but manufacturing facility had not come into existence; It was only that the land was purchased and they were in the process of establishing the manufacturing unit. During investigation from the statement of the officials of M/s. VPL it is clear that the appellant was aware of the fact that M/s. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

SSI unit. In the present case, the goods have not been produced by M/s. VPL but by the appellant. In our considered view, the said clarifications of Circular: B-21/15/ 86-TRU, dated 3-4-1987 and Circular No. 46/90-CX.8, dated 11-7-1990 are not relevant. In the present circumstances, what is to be seen is M/s. VPL is a functional SSI unit and eligible for the benefit of Notification 175/86. - Decided against assessee. - Appeal No. E/2990 & 2991/05 - Mum - Dated:- 15-9-2015 - Shri P.K. Jain, Membe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Vellanova Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (VPL for short). The medicines manufactured were having the brand name of M/s. VPL. It was further claimed that the said M/s. VPL is a small scale unit and since the appellant were manufacturing the goods of another small scale unit carrying the brand name of that SSI, they are eligible for the benefit of Notification 175/86 even in respect of goods manufactured on behalf of M/s. VPL. 2. On the basis of information, the matter was investigated and it was found that .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

connection, bank loan, etc. During the period in question no manufacturing activity was carried out by M/s. VPL as the unit did not have manufacturing facility. Keeping in view the fact that M/s. VPL did not have the manufacturing facility during the relevant period and therefore, cannot be considered as a Small Scale unit, Revenue is of the view that the benefit of Notification 175/86 cannot be extended to the appellant in respect of the goods manufactured by them on behalf of M/s. VPL. After .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the appellants main contention was that appellant has undertaken the manufacturing on behalf of M/s. VPL after filing the classification list in which it was very clearly shown that they are going to manufacture goods on behalf of M/s. VPL. It was further submitted that at the relevant time M/s. VPL had provisional SSI registration certificate and as clarified by the Board vide circular no. B-21/15/86-TRU dated 03.04.1987 the provisional registration from the state government authorities could .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ani Textile Mills 1996 (88) ELT 639 (SC) * Giridhara Supply Co. 1997 (94) ELT 14 (SC) * Project Technologists P. Ltd. 2003 (161) ELT 783 (T) * Laxmi Vishnu Dye Chem 2002 (142) ELT 611 (T) 3.1. Ld. counsels contention was that since the classification list was approved and M/s. VPL had the provisional SSI registration certificate which was later on converted into permanent SSI certificate, Revenue cannot demand the duty at this stage and therefore there is no question of any penalty. It was furth .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ourt after the amendment in the law and the same has been discussed in detail by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ITW Signode India Ltd. 2003 (158) ELT 403 (SC). Ld. AR submitted in view of the said decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court approval of the classification list cannot stop the department from issuing the demand for the past period. Further, extended period of limitation can be invoked if the ingredients of proviso are satisfied. 4.1. Ld. AR further submitted that the i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tubes & Structurals 2015 (165) ELT 481 * CCE vs. Rukmani Pakkwell Traders 2004 (165) ELT 481 * CCE vs. Ace Auto Comp. Ltd. 2011 (263) ELT 3 (SC) * Parle Bisleri P. Ltd. 2011 (263) ELT 15 (SC). 4.2. Ld. AR further submitted that there is no dispute that the medicine manufactured had the brand name of M/s. VPL and therefore the goods manufactured were branded goods. Thus appellant manufactured goods carrying brand name of M/s. VPL. It was further submitted that since M/s. VPL at the relevant t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d electricity connection, bank loan etc. from various authorities. It is only after the unit starts commercial production that permanent SSI certificate is granted. Ld. AR further submitted that appellant is not claiming that M/s. VPL was a functional unit during the period under dispute. Ld. AR also submitted that the clarifications referred are relevant for the goods manufactured in SSI unit themselves and not to the goods which have been manufactured on their behalf in some other unit. In vie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lly suppressed from the Revenue in the classification list. 5. We have considered the submissions made by both sides. The relevant provisions in Notification 175/86 is as under : 7. The exemption contained in the Notification shall not apply to the specified goods where a manufacturer affixes the specified goods with a brand name or trade name (registered or not) of another person who is not eligible for the grant of exemption under this notification: Provided that nothing contained in this para .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e goods manufactured on behalf of other SSI unit carrying the brand name of such other SSI unit. However, if a SSI unit was manufacturing the branded goods on behalf of any person other than SSI unit then benefit of Notification 175/86 in respect of such goods was not available. In the present case, there is no dispute that the appellants were manufacturing the branded goods on behalf of M/s. VPL. However, the appellant has claimed the benefit on the grounds M/s. VPL is a SSI unit. We find from .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not having manufacturing facility and has not commenced the commercial production. Hence goods manufactured by the appellant in the brand name of M/s. VPL would not be eligible for the benefit of Notification 175/86. Ld. counsel has emphasised that the unit was provisionally registered and in view of Boards clarification dated 03.04.1987 and further clarification dated 11.07.1990, M/s. VPL will be eligible to the benefit of SSI. We have gone through the clarification. Relevant portion of clari .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e purpose of availment of duty concession under the aforesaid notification. Circular No. 46/90-CX.8, dated 11-7-1990 Doubts were raised whether : - (a) An assessee who was holding a provisional certificate but is denied permanent registration would still be entitled to exemption in terms of para 4(b) of Notification No. 175/86 and (b) With regard to point No.(a), the Conference felt that a provisional registration with SSI Directorate was no registration. For purposes of Notification No. 175/86, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

SSI unit. The said clarifications are in respect of the goods produced by the SSI unit themselves by availing the benefit of Notification 175/86. The purpose of this clarification is that many a time a unit might have a provisional SSI certificate and thereafter would have started the commercial production while the state government authorities grant permanent SSI certificate after ensuring that such unit have started the commercial production and have the necessary capabilities and facilities. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version